Deceit & Misrepresentation The Soap Allegations Weber's
seventh claim:
More recently, Jewish historian Walter Laqueur "denied
established history" by acknowledging in his 1980 book, The
Terrible Secret, that the human soap story has no basis in
reality.
[11]
Weber makes this sentence sound very dramatic, especially since he
insists on mentioning that Laqueur is Jewish, so we should look and see
just what Laqueur actually said: "It emerged after the war that
the [soap] story was in fact untrue."
[12]
This was a completely nonchalant sentence from Laqueur, which Weber
tried to turn into a dramatic concession and "denial of established
history." Laqueur was only saying what several others have
said -- that many people believed the soap allegations during the War.
Weber's eighth claim:
Gitta Sereny, another Jewish historian, noted in her book Into
That Darkness: "The universally accepted story that the
corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the
generally very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation
into Nazi Crimes."
[13]
The first part of that quotation is pure overstatement on Sereny's
part: it was never "universally accepted," and she should not
have phrased it that way. But what is most important is that Weber
neglects to include Sereny's next sentence in his quotation. She
continued:
The Authority has found
after considerable research that only one experiment was made, with a few
corpses from a concentration camp. When it proved impractical the idea was
apparently abandoned.
[14]
Although Sereny does not provide a citation for her quotation from
the Ludwigsburg Authority, she is clearly stating that the Authority
found that there was an attempt to make soap from human
remains, but that it was given up. Weber deliberately omitted the second
half of Sereny's quotation because it did not fit his thesis.
Weber's ninth claim:
The "RIF" soap bar initials that supposedly stood for
"Pure Jewish Fat" actually indicated nothing more sinister
than "Reich Center for Industrial Fat Provisioning"
("Reichsstelle für Industrielle Fettversorgung"), a
German agency responsible for wartime production and distribution of
soap and washing products. RIF soap was a poor quality substitute that
contained no fat at all, human or otherwise.
[15]
Weber is correct that the RIF soap was not made from human remains.
But is it any wonder that people believed it during 1942-45, especially
when Germans were taunting inmates at
Auschwitz
that they would be turned into soap?
What is interesting, though, is that Mazur never mentions any
initials on the soap that he claimed was made at the
Danzig Anatomical Institute.
On the photograph of the soap evidence from the IMT, introduced as
USSR-393, no initials are present. This photograph is reproduced on
page 201 of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, by
Arthur Butz.
It is also available at Nizkor: an
overview,
and a
closeup of the soap.
Thus, the RIF soap really has nothing to do with the Danzig
Anatomical Institute. The rumors that Jewish corpses were being used to
make soap began to surface in the West as early as August 1942. The
Danzig soap evidence is all dated 1944: Mazur testified that Spanner
gave him the soap "recipe" in February 1944 (IMT document
USSR-197), the recipe from the Danzig Institute is dated February 15,
1944 (USSR-196), William Neely's testimony stated that the soap tank was
installed in March or April 1944 (USSR-272), and so on.
Himmler himself was disturbed by the rumors that bodies of Jews were
being used for soap and/or fertilizer, since the Nazis' extermination
plans demanded strict secrecy. On November 30, 1942, after Rabbi
Stephen Wise mentioned the soap rumors to the press in New York City on
November 24, Himmler wrote to Heinrich Müller, head of the Gestapo:
In view of the large emigration movement of Jews, I do not wonder
that such rumors come to circulate in the world.
We both know that there is present an increased mortality among the
Jews put to work. You have to guarantee to me that the corpses of these
deceased Jews are either burned or buried at each location, and that
absolutely nothing else can happen with the corpses at any location.
Conduct an investigation immediately everywhere whether any kind of
misuse [of corpses] has taken place of the sort as listed in point 1,
probably strewn about in the world as a lie.
Upon the SS-oath I am to be notified of each misuse of this kind.
[16]
It is clear, then, that the RIF soap allegations were merely a rumor,
even though many people believed it at the time. But the RIF soap
rumors have nothing to do with the allegations regarding Professor
Spanner's possible experiments at the Danzig Anatomical Institute. What
Himmler's letter does imply, though, is that if
Spanner used Jewish corpses (which has never been claimed or
documented), then Himmler should have known about it.
Weber's tenth claim:
Shortly after the war the public prosecutor's office of Flensburg,
Germany, began legal proceedings against Dr. Rudolf Spanner for his alleged
role in producing human soap at the Danzig Institute. But after an
investigation the charge was quietly dropped. In a January 1968 letter, the
office stated that its inquiry had determined that no soap from human
corpses was made at the Danzig Institute during the war.
[17]
Actually, Spanner was investigated twice by German authorities: in Hamburg
(1947) and in Flensburg (1947-48). Both times he was not prosecuted. Does
that mean that he was completely innocent, or that there was not enough
evidence to proceed with a case? One would need to read the complete file
on Spanner from the Flensburg Public Prosecutor's Office to understand
fully the reasons for the cases being dropped.
Weber's eleventh claim:
He [Yehuda Bauer] had the chutzpah to blame the [soap] legend on the
Nazis.
[18]
Douglas Frost has already been quoted above from his Nuremberg
testimony that Germans taunted Auschwitz inmates that they
would be turned into soap. Because of testimony such as Frost's,
Professor Bauer believes that the Nazis "used [soap threats] as a
form of additional sadism, in words this time, on their Jewish
victims."
[19]
In reading Mark Weber's article, it is clear that he is deliberately
overstating the belief in the soap allegations among what he calls
"exterminationist" historians, so as to make his debunking of
it seem that much more important and dramatic.
In truth, most historians do not believe that soap was mass produced from human remains (most of those who even mention the soap allegations at all in their writings are survivors who either actually saw the "RIF" soap, or who were taunted by the Germans that they would be made into soap). No matter what we know now, it was widely rumored during the
Second World War that soap was being (and even Himmler heard the rumors), so we can forgive the victims of the Nazis for believing that their persecutors would do such a thing.
Konnilyn Feig, writing in Hitler's Death Camps, is one of the few historians who argue that the Nazis made human soap. In his article, Weber overstates support for the soap allegations and attempts to build up this straw man so he can dramatically tear it down, and thereby hopefully cast doubt on the Nuremberg proceedings and the entire Holocaust. Whatever doesn't fit into his thesis is either glossed over (the Frost statement), misstated (the Judgment of the IMT), or omitted (Sereny's full quotation).
Weber also fails to differentiate between the various soap
allegations. He is correct in asserting that RIF soap was not made from
human remains. He is correct in asserting that there were no "soap
factories" which mass-produced soap from human remains.
But he fails to address or respond to the affidavits of Sigmund
Mazur, William Neely, or the second British POW, John Witton. All three
worked at the Danzig Anatomical Institute. Weber merely states that
Rudolf Spanner was cleared in 1948. But does the fact that a German
prosecutor immediately after the War failed to bring charges against a
prominent German academic mean that professor was necessarily innocent?
Tests show that Nazis used human remains to make soap
Warsaw, Poland
The Nazis used human fat to make soap during World War II in a Nazi German
medical academy located in what is now the Polish Baltic sea port city of
Gdansk, Polish war crimes prosecutors confirmed on Friday, pointing to new
laboratory tests.
Officials with Poland's Institute for National Remembrance (IPN) based their
findings on a laboratory analysis of a piece of soap found in 1945 in the
medical academy in Gdansk run by Nazi German Professor Rudolf Spanner.
A new laboratory analysis of the soap revealed human fat was one of its
components, spokesperson for the Gdansk branch of the IPN, Paulina Szumera,
told Deutsche Presse-Agentur in a telephone interview on Friday.
Commissioned by the IPN, Professor Andrzej Stolyhwo of the Warsaw Agricultural
University found human tissue in the soap.
The piece of soap was used as evidence in the post-WWII Nuremburg Trials where
prominent German Nazis were prosecuted for crimes against humanity. At the
time, prosecutors lacked the technology to determine whether the soap contained
human tissue.
Human remains used to make the soap were believed to have been brought from
Kaliningrad, Bydgoszcz and the Stutthof Nazi German concentration camp located
about 30 from Gdansk.
The IPN investigation found that the soap in question produced by Professor
Spanner was used to clean operating and autopsy rooms. -- Sapa-dpa
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
The Techniques of Holocaust Denial
Part 2 of 6
Source: Mail & Guardian Online, http://www.mg.co.za/
October 6, 2006
06 October 2006 04:41