The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/american/codoh//press/Hofstra_University.991117

Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company
The New York Times
November 17, 1999, Wednesday, Late Edition - Final
Section B; Page 8; Column 1; Metropolitan Desk

"Angry Press Debate at Hofstra Over Ad Doubting Holocaust"


   A 27-page advertisement that casts doubt on the Holocaust's existence
has led to angry debate at Hofstra University, where editors of the
student newspaper were confronted at a crowded forum today by angered
students, faculty members and leaders of campus Jewish organizations.

The ad, which is titled "The Revisionist: A Journal of Independent
Thought" and includes topics like "Gas Chamber Skepticism," ran as an
insert in 5,000 copies of the student newspaper, The Chronicle, on Oct.
28. The ad's creator, Bradley R. Smith, a Californian who has long
argued that Jews made up the Holocaust to gain sympathy, had offered it
to student newspapers across the country, but Hofstra's is believed to
be the only college newspaper to have published it. The Chronicle and
other college papers have published smaller ads by Mr. Smith.

At a two-hour forum attended by about 200 people today, the editor in
chief of The Chronicle, Shawna Van Ness, a junior, and some faculty
members defended the newspaper's decision as free speech and a
beneficial spark for debate.

"Since I've come on as a freshman, we've never rejected an ad," Ms. Van
Ness said, adding that the paper would not be discouraged from printing
controversial material.

But some faculty members angrily argued that rejecting ad copy does not
restrict speech, and that the Holocaust's existence is not open for

"The ad is not controversial," said a panel member, Nitza Druyan, an
adjunct professor of comparative literature and languages. "It's a lie."

But Stephen R. Knowlton, an associate journalism professor, said: "I do
not think that The Chronicle made a mistake. I think that they did the
university a great service." Because of the controversy, he said, many
more people are now aware of Mr. Smith's revisionist views.

Since 1991, Mr. Smith has submitted full and half-page advertisements
for his organization, the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust, to
college newspapers, accusing "Zionists" of stifling debate about the
Holocaust's existence to "drum up world sympathy." His views raised
similarly heated debates in 1993 when student newspapers at Brandeis,
Notre Dame, Georgetown, Duke, Cornell and Northwestern published an ad
by Mr. Smith titled "A Revisionist's View of the U.S. Holocaust Museum."

Efforts to find Mr. Smith for comment were not successful.

Jeffrey A. Ross, an official of the Anti-Defamation League who attended
today's forum, said the most recent ad was rejected by student
newspapers at the University of South Carolina, Rice, the University of
Delaware, Georgia State, Virginia and Queens College.

Ms. Van Ness said today that smaller ads from Mr. Bradley had run in The
Chronicle and in 89 other college newpapers, so that when her paper's
editorial staff debated including the much longer insert, the discussion
was routine.

"It went before our editorial board and was approved by an overwhelming
majority," she said.

Hofstra's director of Jewish chaplains, Rabbi Meier Mitelman, did not
object either when he learned three days before publication that the
paper was planning to run the insert.

At the forum, Michael DeLuise, the vice president for university
relations, criticized Rabbi Mitelman for failing to notify
administrators so they could talk with the newspaper's staff or solicit
advertisements to counter Mr. Smith's message.

"By your silence, were you helping to give Bradley Smith a stage?" Mr.
DeLuise asked Rabbi Mitelman at the forum. "You knew about it."

Rabbi Mitelman accepted some measure of blame. "The choice not to bring
that to the attention of the university was an oversight," he said. "Not
expressing my outrage was a mistake."

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.