Newsgroups: soc.college Subject: CODOH's paid advertisements: Carnegie-Melon Summary: Carnegie-Melon "Tartan" addresses CODOH's "The Case for Open Debate" advertisement (April, 1992) Followup-To: alt.revisionism Distribution: world Organization: The Old Frog's Almanac Keywords: CODOH,Carnegie-Melon Archive/File: orgs/american/codoh/university.response carnegie-melon.001 Last-Modified: 1994/02/15 With the recent CODOH ad campaign underway (the ad denegrates the new Holocaust Memorial Museum, in Washington, D.C., and has been published to the net more than once by Dan Gannon, the owner and operator of the neo-Nazi bulletin board system known as "b-cpu," I thought it might be worthwhile to provide this year's new users with some academic response to both the recent ad and the previous one. Archive/File: holocaust/codoh cmelon.001 Last-Modified: 1993/10/24 The following article appeared in the 20 April, 1992 issue of _The Tartan_, Carnegie Mellon's student newspaper: HOLOCAUST DEBATE REACHES COLLEGE NEWSPAPERS By Jennifer Forbes (Tartan Copy Manager) and M.K. Rodgers (Tartan Managing Editor) In recent months, many college newspapers across the country hav received an advertisement from the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH). This committee, which consists of Bradley R. Smith, the ad's author, and three regional directors, Andrew Allen, David Cole, and Robert Countess, states that the purpose of CODOH is to "inform the American public, and specifically college students and others in academia, of the 'other side' of the Holocaust story." The ad, the text of which is a lengthy essay by Smith, entitled "The Holocaust Controversy: the Case for Open Debate," which basically attempts to refute the existence of the Holocaust. Espousing the idea of revisionist history, which encourages historians to question past events in light of new or changing material, CODOH claims that the evidence supporting the Holocaust has been exaggerated or is false. "The ad is anti-Semitic as well as historically inaccurate," said Mark Weitzman, the associate director of educational outreach at the Simon Wiesenthal Center. He contends that certain aspects of the Holocaust are debateable, but its existence is incontrovertible. Statements such as "no execution gas chambers existed in any camp in Europe which ws under German control," can be found in the ad's text. The essay also disputes the validity of the photographs taken at the concentration camps, and the papers that document the Nazi policy of Jewish extermination. In addition, the advertisement contends that he eyewitness testimony is unreliable. It says that the generally accepted number of Jewish people killed, 6 million, is far too high. The argument also claims that the viewpoint expressed by CODOH is unpopular because there is a "taboo" on questioning the validity of the Holocaust. Smith said, "Ther is an irrational prohibition against expression of doubt [about the Holocaust]." Smith, who holds a high school diploma, admits that the ad is "not scholarly work." He said, "Every generation revises the history of the generation before. This is nothing unique or unusual....There's a taboo against criticizing the documents about the Holocaust." Most people would dispute Smith's claims. Peter Stearns, head of the History Department, said, "This is a political move, not a scholarly one. Ther is no serious historical question that millions of Jews were killed in World War II -- deliberately." Stearns said the term of revisionist history can be understood as historians questioning dominant interpretations of events or fact in light of new material. "[They] use the term correctly, but there is no other material in this case. "The ad has no validity. No respectable historian would think it has any." Stearns knew of no legitimate research that could support any of Smith's claims, and offered the fact that new records are surfacing, especially in the former USSR, which indicate that the number murdered is much higher than 6 million. THe advertisement appears to be "an effort by [CODOH] to find a way to discredit and attack Jews," said Stearns. Rabbi Joseph H. Levine, director of B'nai B'rith Hillel at CMU, who teaches two courses on the Holocaust at CMU, called the ad and its claims "a desecration to the memory of those who perished." Levine said that the ad uses a type of circular logic to make itself appear legitimate. "To throw into doubt a tragedy that is so massively documented compounds the tragedy," said Levine. The ad has stirred up controversy on the college campuses that it has reached. Many student newspapers have refused to run the ad in any form. Others have run it as an advertisement or an editorial piece, some have written editorials on it, and others have done both. Duke printed the piece as and advertisement. Northwestern and Cornell have run the ad in some form. Rutgers ran the essay ans an editorial piece and surrounded it with rebuttals. Harvard, Yale, Brown, University of Pennsylvania, and University of Southern California have refused to run the ad. "I don't understand why the ad is so controversial on campuses where free exchange of ideas would be taken for granted," said Smith. He also said that he has heard from the college papers that the Holocaust cannot be debated and that he does not understand why it as an historical event cannot be questioned. Many student newspapers reserve the right to refuse any advertisement. Some have not run the ad citing the historical inaccuracies. Others decided not to run it because they felt that it is not a free-speech issue. Some who ran the ad felt that it was the newspaper's duty to inform the campus community of these types of opinions. Karen Kaplan, the executive editor of the _MIT Tech_, explained that the did not run the ad, but did write an editorial column about it because, "It's not open debate, it's propoganda." Even when "The Holocaust Controversy: the Case for Open Debate" has been sent to all the colleges and universities on CODOH's list, Smith won't be finished. According to staffers of the Harvard _Crimson_ and Duke's _The Chronicle, a second ad by CODOH has begun to make the rounds. (A few notes on Peter Stearns' background: bachelor's, master's, and Ph.D degrees from Harvard University, 39 books in print, Founder and Editor-in-Chief of the _Journal of Social History_, Editor of the _Encyclopedia of Social History_, and Heinz Professor of History. Professor Stearns was just named as the new Dean of the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at Carnegie Mellon.) Originally posted by: ------------------------------------- Allan Bourdius [(|)K(-)/USMCR] ab3o+@andrew.cmu.edu
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.