The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: orgs/canadian/canada/justice/hate-motivated-violence/hmv-005-04


Archive/File: orgs/canadian/canada/justice/hate-motivated-violence/hmv-005-04
Last-Modified: 1997/01/21
Source: Department of Justice Canada

5.4 New Zealand

New Zealand has a crime of inciting to racial disharmony.
Section 25 of its Race Relations Act 1971 states that every
person commits an offence "who with intent to excite
hostility or ill-will against, or bring into contempt or
ridicule, any group of persons in New Zealand on the ground
of the colour, race, or ethnic or national origins of that
group of persons, publishes or distributes written matter or
broadcasts words which are threatening, abusive, or
insulting or uses in any public place, etc., words which are
threatening, abusive, or insulting, being matter or words
likely to excite hostility or ill-will against, or bring
into contempt or ridicule, any such group of persons in New
Zealand on the ground of the colour, race or ethnic origins
of that group of persons."<167>

However, there is no specific crime of hate-motivated
violence in New Zealand. So far as the Department of
Justice of New Zealand is aware, no research is being
undertaken or planned by government-funded agencies on the
topic of hate-motivated crime, nor is there any interest
there in creating separate offences for such crime. It has
generally seemed satisfactory for such crime to be dealt
with under the offences listed in the Crimes Act 1961
according to the specific injury or damage committed. <168>

5.5 Federal Republic of Germany

The Penal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany has
legislated certain hate crimes such as the crime of
criminal agitation ( 130), which includes, in a manner
likely to disturb the public peace, attacking human dignity
by arousing hatred against segments of the population; that
of incitement to racial hatred ( 131); and that of the
crime of insult ( 185), which, as a result of changes to
the complaint process ( 194), can be used to prosecute
instances of Holocaust denial.<169  >

However, in German criminal law there are no special
criminal offences covering racially motivated attacks and
superseding general provisions (e.g., those on murder,
manslaughter or infliction of bodily harrn3. However,
racist motives for committing a crime would be used as an
aggravating factor in the determination of punishment,
although the penalty imposed would have to lie within the
spectrum of punishment provided by the Code.<170>

5.6 France

At the time of writing this paper, there are criminal
offences found in the current Penal Code in France (in
force until September 1, 1993) that criminalize certain
discriminatory conduct (e.g., section 416 -- refusal to
provide goods or services by reason of racial and other
discrimination). There are also offences found in the law
governing the press that penalize hateful defamation or
insult, as well as provoking discrimination, hate or
violence towards a person or a group of persons by reason
of their origin or their belonging to or not belonging to
an ethnic group, a nation, a race, or a religion.<171>
However, the current Penal Code does not contain specific
crimes of hate-motivated violence (such as hate-motivated
assault). Robin Oakley, in a consultant's report to the
Council of Europe on racial violence and harassment,
states:

     In considering racial violence and harassment, it must
     be observed that the law on racism is primarily
     concerned with verbal and written actions, and not
     those of direct physical attack. The latter incidents
     are dealt with under the general penal code. The
     element of racist motivation is not taken into account
     by the penal law, either as an offence, nor as a
     factor in sentencing. In January, 1985, however, a
     change was made to allow anti-racist organizations to
     take legal action as civil parties in cases where the
     "racial" dimension is present.<172>

It should be noted that France has recently adopted a new
Penal Code, which will come into effect on September 1,
993.173 It contains, with modifications, the crimes of
discriminatory conduct found in the present Penal Code.
Generally, the new Code does not provide for specific crimes
of hate-motivated violence (although one exception is that
the new Penal Code specifically provides that attacks
against corpses or cemeteries that are hate-motivated are to
result in a greater penalty<174>).

5.7 Sweden

The Swedish Penal Code contains, in Chapter 3, On Crimes
Against Life and Health, the crimes of murder, assault, and
aggravated assault,<175> and, in Chapter 5, On Defamation,
the crime of insulting conduct, which can be prosecuted by
the public prosecutor and not just by the aggrieved person
where the insult alludes to a person's race, skin colour,
national or ethnic origin, religious creed or alleged
homosexual inclination.<176> There is no specific crime of
hate-motivated violence. However, there are other crimes
that address racial hatred or racial discrimination.
Chapter 16, On Crimes Against Public Order, prohibits
agitation against an ethnic group (Section 8), and unlawful
discrimination in the conduct of business (Section 9). A
person who infamously treats a corpse or who damages a
grave, et cetera, can also be sentenced for crime against
the peace of the tomb (Section 10).

Recently, a commission set up to investigate the need for,
and drafting of, legislation against racist organizations,
proposed, among other proposed amendments to the Penal
Code, that racist motives for or racist components in a
crime should constitute a general ground for the increase
in the severity of a punishment, but the government has not
yet acted on this proposal (or on the others).<177>

5.8 Summary .

This chapter has outlined how the criminal law in certain
foreign jurisdictions _in the United States, in some
Commonwealth countries, and in some Western European
countries_attempts to combat hate-motivated violence.
Although no uniform criminal law approach has been taken,
at the very least all these countries have regarded hate-
motivated violence as a serious problem that needs to be
addressed. The most vigorous criminal law response has been
taken by the United States, where many states have
legislated specific hate crimes, where the Congress has
been considering creating an amendment to the federal
sentencing guidelines that would enhance the penalty for
federal crimes that were hate-motivated, and where hate
crime statistics, by the operation of a federal hate crime
statistics act, are compiled nationally. Generally,
excepting crimes of incitement to racial hatred, the
approach of the other countries appears to be to rely on
basic crimes (such as assault) to prosecute incidents of
hate-motivated violence, rather than to create specific
crimes to address such violence (such as hate-motivated
assault). But this has not meant that the problem of racist
violence has been ignored. In England, for example, the
emphasis is on using existing criminal law provisions and
on using a multi-agency approach to better combat such
violence. And, in some countries, such as Australia and
Sweden, it has been recommended that the criminal law be
changed to combat this problem more directly. For example,
in Australia two national reform agencies have recommended
the creation of specific crimes of racist violence. In
short, these jurisdictions have, for the most part,
recognized the seriousness of hate-motivated violence
either by legislating on the issue or by studying the issue
and/or using means other than legislation to combat the
problem.

It must be recognized, however, that circumstances can
arise where, although it cannot be said that the attacker
was motivated by hatred of a person's actual or perceived
race, religion, colour, et cetera, nonetheless the
circumstances of the violent behaviour raise the spectre of
mistreatment of a visible minority by the criminal justice
system. Perhaps the best known example of this kind is the
Rodney King beating. Does the response of the American
criminal justice system to the Rodney King beating offer an
additional means by which to combat bias-motivated conduct?
This will be addressed in the next chapter.



Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.