From ceacaa@aol.com Sat Feb 17 09:45:27 PST 1996 Article: 23864 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!news.cyberstore.ca!van-bc!uniserve!news.sol.net!daily-planet.execpc.com!homer.alpha.net!uwm.edu!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Pellets, shower, porous pillars... Date: 16 Feb 1996 11:07:16 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 14 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4g2a3k$qc8@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References:Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Dear Mr. Van Alstine: I repeat that I am talking about roof of Leichenhalle 1 Crema II. Although there is a hole in the ground at the site of the alleged gaschamber there is something in the hole. I had hoped that J. Morris would make a clear response to my request for confirmation what is there. All readers of this thread should rely on Pressac. Please refer to Pressac Technique & Operation at page 354. This will confirm for you, Mr. Van Alstine, that there is a concrete roof collasped into the hole. Once you have satisfied yourself that I am correct in this matter, I invite you to proceed with our discussion. The construction of the roof should be of interest to both Exterminationists and Revisionists. Lies written in ink can never disguise facts written in concrete. F.L. From jmorris@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca Sat Feb 17 09:47:01 PST 1996 Article: 23842 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.mindlink.net!rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!news From: jmorris@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John Morris) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Pellets, shower, porous pillars... Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 06:33:14 GMT Organization: University of Alberta Lines: 95 Message-ID: <4g3sou$7ls@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> References: <4fb5p2$mp6@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4fgp1a$1t62@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: async15-15.remote.ualberta.ca X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 mvanalst@rbi.com (Mark Van Alstine) wrote: >In article <4fgp1a$1t62@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca>, jmorris@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca >(John Morris) wrote: >> ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: >> >> >Dear Mr. Van Alstine: >> > Thank you for your detailed response. I will track down >> >your cites. I note that I was not writing about Crema I >> >but about Crema II and III. The question is the lack of >> >any fittings to hold pillars in place (either on the floor >> >or in the roof) and the ad hoc nature of the "vents", ie. >> >crudely chipped with the re-bar still in place. >> >> So far I have found your description far too vague in terms of which >> Krema still has its roof mostly intact though collapsed. In which >> roof, II or III, are the crudely chipped in holes still visible? >> >Mr. Morris, >I believe Ceacaa has stated that the Kremas in question are, in fact >Kremas II and III. Below is an excerpt from my reply to the article where >he mentions this: >=============================================================================== >In article <4ferel$6jn@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: >> Dear Mazal Over Board Exterminationist: >> >> We are sorry that it would take you "many a merry hour" to >> make a reconstruction of our initials. We had hoped for (although >> not expected) some small show of wit from you rather than your >> usual ad hominem stupidities. >> Of course you totally miss the point of our comment. You >> do not have to believe our description of the so-called >> "vents" in the ceiling of Leichenhalle 1 Cremas II and III. >> The holes still exist and can be viewed. What was there can >> be sussed out from what is there now. >Again, I feel compelled to point out that you claim to have seen firsthand >these vent holes in the ceiling of the gas-chamber in Krema II. I find >this interesting in that, according to a photgraph in _Auschwitz: a >history in photograp[hs_, the gas-chamber of Krema II is nothing more than >an open pit in the ground filled with the ruins of the structure and >weeds. There is no ceiling to the gas-chamber, and thus no vent holes to >see. This really perplexes me. In the Nova television presentation "Designers of Death," Prof. Van Pelt is seen standing in the remains of the gas chamber at Krema II, and it is as you describe: a pit full of weeds and little else besides bits of foundation walls. Messrs. Raven and Ceacaa claim to have seen otherwise. I am assured by more reliable people in private e-mail that portions of one of the gas chamber cielings is still largely intact. But it cannot be Krema II unless my eyes deceive me. That is why I asked Ceacaa to specify which cieling was still intact. He now specifies L.Keller I at Krema II which was the gas chamber. So I am still quite perplexed. Nevertheless, the claim that the gas chamber cieling at either of Krema II or III should have crudely chipped in holes for the grillwork induction columns is consistent with what Prof. Van Pelt has discovered about the series of decisions leading to the use of L.Keller I as a gas chamber. It was originally planned to use the L.Keller as a morgue just as its name suggests, and there was thus no need to have made allowances for the induction columns. Instead, the roof had one ventilation hole consistent with the needs of an ordinary morgue. As the inefficiency of transporting the bodies of the victims from Bunker I became more apparent, the L.Keller was redeployed as a gas chamber. Only then did it become necessary to cut holes into the cieling for the induction columns. However crudely made these holes may have been, it would be a fairly simple matter to seal them well enough to prevent significant quantities of HCN from escaping through the roof. Mr. Ceacaa's objection that the holes were cut into the roof by the Soviets is thus far unsupported by any evidence. It is simply another convenient way of displacing inconvenient evidence. One might almost call it a "deus ex machina" method of adducing evidence. -- John Morris at University of Alberta ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Nizkor Project: An Electronic Holocaust Resource File archives - ftp://ftp.almanac.bc.ca Web page - http://nizkor.almanac.bc.ca From ceacaa@aol.com Mon Feb 19 08:36:44 PST 1996 Article: 24100 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Pellets, shower, porous pillars... Date: 18 Feb 1996 22:16:50 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 16 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4g8q32$bhe@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Dear Group: This comment is on the thread of the "porous pillars" however, Mark Van Alstein wrote that: Kremas IV and V, having above ground gas-chambers, on the relied natural draft generated when the gas-chamber doors, which opened to the outside, were opened to ventilate them. This theory of ventilation is impossible as anyone who has visited the ruins of KIV or KV knows. Only one of the several rooms alleged to have been a gas chamber in K V had an outside door. If one had relied on "natural drafts" to clear the air of the gaschambers, you would have gassed the whole building. For reference see Pressac pg. 391 Document 14 From ceacaa@aol.com Thu Feb 22 12:12:48 PST 1996 Article: 24516 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e1a.megaweb.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Pellets, shower, porous pillars... Date: 22 Feb 1996 01:19:43 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 14 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4gh1tv$75@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Dear Group Mark Van Alstine writes, " Hmm. I do believe, Ceacaa, that you are a bit mistaken here. Unsuprising, considering you claims about the Krema II." My claims (actually statements of the Absolute Truth) about the Krema II consist solely of a discussion of the roof of Leichenkeller 1, ie. what was there in May 1944 and is there now, claims that Pressac and (apparently) J. Morris agree with. But, Mr. Van Alstine, let's take this one step at a time. Do you agree that the roof of Leichenkeller 1 of Krematorium II, Birkenau was made of a poured in place concrete slab with wooden forms? From ceacaa@aol.com Thu Feb 22 23:06:39 PST 1996 Article: 24638 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Ceacaa's eerie silence was (Re: Pellets, shower, porous pi Date: 23 Feb 1996 00:04:03 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 9 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4gjhs3$o5b@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fqr0q$3q1g@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Dear Gord McFee, Our silence was due to ski week, members of the collective hit the slopes, please see our response in "pellets, shower, porous pillars. Of course, the issue is what was on the roof in 1944 and what is presently on the roof of L 1 KII. Since most of the exterminationist "experts" don't seem to know what is there now this discussion is moving rather slowly. It is hoped that you and M VS will consult your Pressac and J. Morris and get up to speed on this. From ceacaa@aol.com Fri Feb 23 07:11:49 PST 1996 Article: 24638 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Ceacaa's eerie silence was (Re: Pellets, shower, porous pi Date: 23 Feb 1996 00:04:03 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 9 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4gjhs3$o5b@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4fqr0q$3q1g@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Dear Gord McFee, Our silence was due to ski week, members of the collective hit the slopes, please see our response in "pellets, shower, porous pillars. Of course, the issue is what was on the roof in 1944 and what is presently on the roof of L 1 KII. Since most of the exterminationist "experts" don't seem to know what is there now this discussion is moving rather slowly. It is hoped that you and M VS will consult your Pressac and J. Morris and get up to speed on this. From ceacaa@aol.com Mon Feb 26 22:50:33 PST 1996 Article: 25228 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Ceacaa's eerie silence was (Re: Pellets, shower, porou Date: 26 Feb 1996 23:39:40 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 6 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4gu1uc$g5n@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gtfdp$58u@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) To readers of this thread: You all should know that Gord McFee is known as the Don Rickles of the Exterminationists (only without the humor). If you are interested in an attempt at a serious discussion go back to "Pellets, shower, porous columns" From ceacaa@aol.com Wed Feb 28 06:58:05 PST 1996 Article: 25411 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!imci3!imci4!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: 'porous pillar' Date: 28 Feb 1996 01:14:50 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 38 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4h0rsq$h1m@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com Daniel Keren writes: "The current status of the ceiling has nearly zero relevance to this question." It seems here that D. Keren is now making a tacit admission that the roof of Leichenhalle 1 of Crema II does still exist and is made of poured in place concrete with re-bar. Bravo Daniel! Poured in place concrete is a particularly immutable form of construction and allows one to deduce the order of construction. The roof, as it exists now, is the best evidence of what the roof was like 52 years ago. Remember, Lies written in ink can never disguise facts written in concrete. "The "porous pillar" was a wiremesh introduction device for the Zyklon. It could have simply been removed." Perhaps, but if it were attached either at the top (ceiling or roof) and/or floor there would be bolt holes or clamps. But before we go on too far, let us discuss the number of holes that are on the roof today. I say that there are only three. Most Exterminationists say there are 4. They are wrong. Daniel, do you think that perhaps the Germans removed one of the holes and took it back to Berlin with them or do you agree that there are now just three holes on the roof? Once you learn the correct number of holes, we should move on to the condition of the holes. By then you might see some relevance in the present "status" of the roof. -- -Lu Xun. From ceacaa@aol.com Wed Feb 28 06:58:07 PST 1996 Article: 25418 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: 'porous pillar' Date: 28 Feb 1996 01:59:31 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 98 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4h0ugj$i1d@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4gt86a$1sbu@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) My goodness John Morris pops up too and writes: But I have yet to see a photograph that shows the entire roof, or a series of photographs that shows all the sections of roof. I am still looking for such a photograph, and in the meantime, I am witholding judgment. (Good John, keep an open and skeptical mind. Some day you might even become a Revisionist. Go look at Pressac at 265 for some photographs or buy the David McCalden tape "Escape from Auschwitz".) John goes on to write: There are any number of reasons why the holes would have been cut after construction. (Such as they were part not of the original plan or needed at the time of construction in Feb-March 1943) It could have been that the Nazis kept the homocidal purpose of the chamber from the construction engineers. (This is absurd, the drawings were completed on 8/5/42 by SS Sergeant Ulmer, Checked on 8/5/42 by SS Second Lieutenant Dajaco and SS Sergeant Ertl, and final approved on 8/5/42 by SS Captain Bischoff. These SS men were all part of the Auschwitz staff. It could have been an oversight. (Maybe they forgot the doors too! Don't forget the Myth is that Crema II was the result of Hoes's visit to Treblinka to learn the "best techniques". He also practiced at Crema I in the main camp. If Hoes's confession is true then the failure to put in the necessary vent holes cannot have been an oversight. It could have been that they realized that throwing Zyklon B through the door was not very effective. (Especially if it was in the basement of the building) It could have been that they realized that throwing Zyklon B through the ceiling vent was not very effective. (No John, the ceiling vents were put in _after_ the ceiling was built) It could have been that the wire mesh induction columns were an afterthought. (This might be true but it does not address the lack of attachment points of roof or floor.) But the absence of direct proof about *why* the SS did things the way they did is not proof that they did not do things. In addition, we have only the word of a denier named Ceacaa who *says* he visited Birkenau and who *says* the roof is intact and who *says* that he found only two crudely cut holes. For all anyone knows, Ceacaa simply read the descriptions by the deniers David Cole and Fred Leuchter. (Mr. Morris, don't you believe eyewitness testimony. Actually, I said there are three holes, two I could wiggle through and one too small to enter. But still, I have to ask, why any holes at all would have been cut into the roof? The deniers assert that the Poles or the Russians cut the holes, but they offer no proof of that assertion, and I am afraid that the claim that something must have been forged or faked by the Soviets is used far too often with inconvenient evidence to have any credibility at all. Some might even call it a "deus ex machina" kind of argument. Indeed, if the Russians did fake the holes, why didn't they do a better job of it? If they were trying to make the physical site match the story, why didn't they cut nice clean holes to match the dimensions of the induction columns? (I don't assert that the Soviets cut the holes in the roof. This is a straw argument. I am limiting my point to the clear evidence of the existing state of the roof. There were no more than three vents: They were put in after the original pour ie. January 1943: The re-bar is still attached but cut in one place and bent out of the way: there are no attachment fixtures or holes for attachments around the holes) For that matter, why were so many witnesses tortured into saying that there were induction columns, and why were documents forged to show how the induction columns ought to be made? If the forgers were so good at making up such a convincing story with such a finely-grained level of verisimiltude, why did they not simply forge an order from Hitler for the extermination of the Jews? Deniers have been convinced by much less sophisticated forgeries such as the Lachout document. Please, the term is Revisionist. "Deniers" is a vulgar term created by those persons who cannot carry a discussion on facts. My point is that the best evidence of what was there in 1943 is what is there now. Lies written in ink cannot disguise facts written in concrete F.L. -- John Morris at University of Alberta ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Nizkor Project: An Electronic Holocaust Resource File archives - ftp://ftp.almanac.bc.ca Web page - http://nizkor.almanac.bc.ca From ceacaa@aol.com Thu Feb 29 06:36:44 PST 1996 Article: 25530 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Ceacaa's eerie silence was (Re: Pellets, shower, porou Date: 29 Feb 1996 02:21:54 -0500 Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) Lines: 3 Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com Message-ID: <4h3k6i$h29@newsbf02.news.aol.com> References: <4h0mk8$1a7c@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> Reply-To: ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) Inane!? I thought my comments were as incisive as Holms (Sherlock) and as penetrating as Holms (Larry).
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.