From mvanalst@rbi.com Thu May 30 20:44:46 PDT 1996 Article: 40264 of alt.revisionism Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.zeitgeist.net!rbi144.rbi.com!user From: mvanalst@rbi.com (Mark Van Alstine) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Pellets, shower, porous pillars... Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 15:18:40 -0700 Organization: rbi software systems Lines: 168 Message-ID:References: <4oecbb$4cf@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4oh6p3$mbk@newsbf02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rbi142.rbi.com X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0.5b5 In article <4oh6p3$mbk@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: > On April 14 John Morris wrote: [snip] > >I can see why this retreat might be necessary: the explanation > >that you offered was pretty much of a bust. > > Actually, the theory that the three existing holes were > created as part of the demolition process seems to becoming > the Standard Exterminationist Explaination. [snip] Ceacaa, that's a pretty amazing statement. It is also untrue. The claim that "the three existing vent holes were created as part of the demolition process" was origionally put forward by none other than yourself, and to which the traditionalists, myself included, have never (to my knowledge) endorsed! To whit: In article <4jajio$ur@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: "My belief is that three holes were chipped through the roof as part of the demolition process in November or December of 1944." In article <4k2eu8$74p@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: "My assumption that the holes were part of the demolition process arises >from the state of the holes, not from any expert understanding of demolition. The holes presently on the roof are of irregular shape, varing size, chipped in after the roof was origninally poured. The rebar of the roof is still in the holes, cut in one place and bent out of the way." In addition, Ceacaa, you have made several other past claims regarding the holes through which Zyklon B was introduced which I am now, having procurred a copy of Pressac's _Techique_, prepared to address in detail: Claim 1: In article <4ev93t$cv1@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: "I have been into the so-called gaschambers of Crema II and III. There are no remains of any porous pillars. The structure's roof is built of poured-in-place concrete. The pattern of the woodforms is visible in the concrete, as are holes for fitings and conduit. Anything which was attached to the ceiling would have left holes or fittings. There are none around the 3 "vents" through which the pellets were poured and the porous pillars attached." Response to Claim 1: As to the alleged lack of any retaining fixtures in the ceiling for the Zyklon B introduction columns, this would be in accordance with the fact that the columns passed _through_ the roof of the L.Keller and was likley surrounded by a "chimney," much like that found in the reconstruction of the Zyklon B vents of Krema I (_Technique_, p.150), which would firmly hold the top of the column in place. The fixed portion of the introduction column was approximately 3 meters in length. If you were to study the Huta drawings 109/13A and 109/14A of 21/9/43 (_Technique_, pp.322-325), you would see the inside dimension for the floor to ceiling height of L.Keller 1 to be 2.40 meters and that the roof of L.Keller 1 is about 26 cm thick. This would imply that the fixed portion of the introduction columns protruded about 40 cm above the concrete roof of L.Keller 1. This is in general accord with Piper's description that says: "...they passed through openenings in the ceiling, ending outside as little chimneys closed with a concrete cover equipped with two handles." (_Anatomy_, p.167.) Claim 2: In article <4ev93t$cv1@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: "The vent holes are crudely chipped in. Re-enforcing steel rods are in the roof. These rods transversed the holes. The re-bar was cut in one place and bent out of the way at the vents. Whoever chipped the holes in the roof did not even bother to finish cutting the re-bar., it is still in place." In article <4g2a3k$qc8@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: "I repeat that I am talking about roof of Leichenhalle 1 Crema II. Although there is a hole in the ground at the site of the alleged gaschamber there is something in the hole. I had hoped that J. Morris would make a clear response to my request for confirmation what is there. All readers of this thread should rely on Pressac. Please refer to Pressac Technique & Operation at page 354...." In article <4gnu3d$728@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: "...You would come to a conclusion regarding the roof of the alleged gaschamber by reference to the sources upon which you normally rely. I refered you to Pressac _Auschwitz Technique ..._ at page 354 et seq. I would hope that other informed persons would confirm my personal observations...." Response to Claim 2: In regards to the photo on page 354 of _Technique_ being a Zyklon B introduction hole, Pressac indeed states that this is one of the _two_ remaining Zyklon B introduction holes. However, I see no evidence (as you claim) that the "rebar of the roof is still in the holes, cut in one place and bent out of the way." What I see are some bent or flattened weed/grass stems protruding into the left of the hole. There is no evidence of any rebar. Furthermore, a close-up photograph of a Zyklon B introduction hole of L.Keller 1 of Krema II also shows no evidence of rebar in it, nor does it appear to be "crudely chipped in." (Document 46 and caption, _Technique_; pp.228-229.) Claim 3: In article <4l23ht$mqk@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: "My question to you, to be answered once we can agree on how much of the roof still exists, is "How many of the vent holes exist today?" I say 3." Response to Claim 3: Pressac states that there are TWO remaining Zyklon B introduction holes in the roof of L.Keller 1 of Krema II (Photo b''' and caption, _Technique_; p.354.) Where is your evidence, Ceacaa, of the third remaining Zyklon B introduction hole? It is also important to note that on the memorandum acknowleding the receipt of Krema II there were FOUR Drahtnetzeinscheibvorrichtung (wire netting inserting devices) listed, which clearly implies that there were FOUR Zyklon B introduction holes in the roof of L.Keller 1. (_Anatomy_, p.233; _Techique_, p.232, 430.) An Allied air photograph of Krema II, taken on August 25, 1944, appears confirm that there were FOUR holes in the roof of L.Keller 1, as they show FOUR "chimneys" on its roof. (_Air Photo Evidence_, p.46. Source: National Archives Air Photo Library, Washington, D.C.; RG 373 Can F 5367, exp. 3185.) Claim 4: In article <4k7mou$qas@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ceacaa@aol.com (Ceacaa) wrote: "But my question is what to make of a conflict between the document and what is on the site today, for example the document says the mesh pillar was 70 cm by 70 cm but the holes are all less than 40 cm?" Response to Claim 4: The existance and size of the vent holes are confirmed by Document 46 and caption, and the Bauleitung drawing 1300 (_Technique_, pp. 228-229,297). A measurment of the drainage manholes in drawing 1300 gives the size of the manhole to be about 60 cm x 60 cm. Document 46 show the _manhole_ cover in the photo to be smaller than the Zyklon B vent hole. Given that the introduction column is described as going _through_ the roof (_Anantomy_, p.167) it is very likely then that the dimensions of the Zyklon B vent holes were about 70 cm x 70 cm, which corrosponds to the dimensions of the fixed portion of the Zyklon B introduction column that would pass through it. Mark posted/e-mailed to Mr. Morris, Dr. Keren, and Ceacaa. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties--but right through every human heart--and all human hearts." -- Alexander Solzhenitsyn, "The Gulag Archipelago" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.