Archive/File: people/b/bacque.james bacque.001 Last-Modified: 1994/10/07 From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!utnut!torn!news2.uunet.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!noc.near.net!news.Brown.EDU!dzk Thu Oct 14 00:00:03 PDT 1993 Article: 18075 of soc.history Xref: oneb soc.history:18075 soc.culture.indonesia:3367 Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!utnut!torn!news2.uunet.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!noc.near.net!news.Brown.EDU!dzk From: dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren) Newsgroups: soc.history,soc.culture.indonesia Subject: Re: Book Review - The American Killings 1944-46 Followup-To: soc.history Date: 13 Oct 1993 06:40:55 GMT Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science Lines: 43 Message-ID: <29g7tn$h88@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: cslab6b.cs.brown.eduwrites: # Read "OTHER LOSSES" by James Bacque (1991), you will know how # General Eisenhower, as a commader-in-chief of the European theater # at the end of WW II killed over 1,700,000 disarmed German soldiers. This is ridiculous. While there was mistreatment of German POW's after the war, the number of those who died in captivity doesn't even approach this figure. Following is an article I posted about this issue some time ago. The claim to about 1 million German POW's who died at the the allied camps was presented in a book by Canadian James Bacque, a novelist who has absolutely no credentials or reputation as a historian. Some comments on the work were made by Prof. Stephen Ambrose, director of the Eisenhower Center at the University of New-Orleans (a thorough refutation appears in the NYT, Feb. 24, 1991). Ambrose does admit that there was mistreatment of German POW's in the spring and summer of 1945, but adds: "When scholars do the necessary research, they will find Mr. Bacque's work to be worse than worthless. It is seriously - nay, spectacularly - flawed in its most fundamental aspects". For example, Bacque's extrapolation of one million deaths is based on on a typographical error in a single army medical report. Ambrose wrote "[Bacque] arrived at his most basic conclusion, a death rate at all camps of 30 percent, by dividing the 21,000 deaths by the 70,000 prisoners [listed in the report]... all other figures in the document make it clear that that the correct number of the prisoners was 700,000. This would make the death rate not 30 percent but 3 percent". In concluding his arguments against Bacque's spurious research, Ambrose wrote "Mr. Bacque is wrong on every major charge and nearly all his minor ones". He than quotes Albert Cowdrey, a military historian for the Department of the Army: "Surely, [Bacque] has reason to be satisfied with his achievement. He has no reputation as a historian to lose, and _Other_Losses_ can only enhance his standing as a writer of fiction". -Danny Keren. From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!noc.near.net!saturn.caps.maine.edu!maine.maine.edu!io21067 Thu Oct 14 00:00:14 PDT 1993 Article: 18052 of soc.history Xref: oneb soc.history:18052 soc.culture.indonesia:3362 Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!noc.near.net!saturn.caps.maine.edu!maine.maine.edu!io21067 Organization: University of Maine System Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1993 19:53:54 EDT From: Message-ID: <93285.195354IO21067@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> Newsgroups: soc.history,soc.culture.indonesia Subject: Re: Book Review - The American Killings 1944-46 References: <1993Oct11.043522.11922@cs.su.oz.au> Lines: 21 Read "OTHER LOSSES" by James Bacque (1991), you will know how General Eisenhower, as a commader-in-chief of the European theater at the end of WW II killed over 1,700,000 disarmed German soldiers. In the front page of that book, you will read statement like this: "The shocking truth behind mass deaths of disarmed German soldiers and civilians under General Eisenhower's command" You had better read that yourself to improve your collection about mass killings. And don't forget, American Indians were also the victim of genocide. Yesterday was a Columbus day; we in New England had no class. Last night, a TV program presented a show on which an Actor said "What if American Indians found Europe instead of Christopher Columbus found America. Would there have been genocide?" Do you think it was also a mass killing? I just curious. Putut Karangtunggal io21067@maine.bitnet *** a villager boy seraching for knowledge From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!gumby!yale!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!caen!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!linus!mbunix!emery Thu Oct 14 14:18:52 PDT 1993 Article: 18096 of soc.history Newsgroups: soc.history Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!gumby!yale!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!caen!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!linus!mbunix!emery From: emery@goldfinger.mitre.org (David Emery) Subject: Re: Book Review - The American Killings 1944-46 In-Reply-To: 's message of Tue, 12 Oct 1993 19:53:54 EDT Message-ID: Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service) Nntp-Posting-Host: goldfinger.mitre.org Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. References: <1993Oct11.043522.11922@cs.su.oz.au> <93285.195354IO21067@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1993 14:05:15 GMT Lines: 16 >Read "OTHER LOSSES" by James Bacque (1991), you will know how >General Eisenhower, as a commader-in-chief of the European theater >at the end of WW II killed over 1,700,000 disarmed German soldiers. A team of historians lead by Stephen Ambrose thoroughly debunked this story. There's a rebuttal book that came out of a conference to examine these claims (No, I don't have a citation. If you're really interested, I'd suggest getting in touch with Dr. Ambrose at the University of New Orleans. This isn't in my area of interest.) It received a lot of 'airplay' within military history circles when the book came out, and I remember hearing something about it on the national media, too. The national media treated the story with some distance, because some of the points stretched credibility, even without any significant historical analysis. dave From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!TAMUTS.TAMU.EDU!news.utdallas.edu!convex!visser Sat Oct 16 18:29:09 PDT 1993 Article: 18197 of soc.history Xref: oneb soc.history:18197 soc.culture.indonesia:3406 Newsgroups: soc.history,soc.culture.indonesia Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!TAMUTS.TAMU.EDU!news.utdallas.edu!convex!visser From: visser@convex.com (Lance Visser) Subject: Re: Eisenhower, was :Re: Book Review - ERRATA ...ERRATA...ERRATA.... Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1993 13:13:42 GMT References: <1993Oct11.043522.11922@cs.su.oz.au> <93285.195354IO21067@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> <93286.015329IO21067@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> <1993Oct13.155823.1431@midway.uchicago.edu> Nntp-Posting-Host: dhostwo.convex.com Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and not necessarily those of CONVEX. Lines: 87 In <1993Oct13.155823.1431@midway.uchicago.edu> azlerner@quads.uchicago.edu (asia z lerner) writes: +>In article <93286.015329IO21067@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes: +>>+++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +>> +>>Message-Id: +>>Read "OTHER LOSSES" by James Bacque (1991), you will know how +>>General Eisenhower, as a commader-in-chief of the European theater +>>at the end of WW II killed over 1,700,000 disarmed German soldiers. +>> ^^^^[a] ^^^^^^^^^^[b] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^[c] +>> +>>Due to technical problem, some words I wrote were missing and some +>>unwanted ones appeared in the screen. I was astonished to find what +>>appeared in the screen. The meaning was quite different from what +>>I meant. Hopefully these errata will help to clarify the statements. +>> +>>[a] should be: was responsible for mass missing/killing +>>[b] should be: Germans determine that over 1,700,000 soldiers, +>> alive at war's end, have never returned home. +>>[c] should be: blank (deleted). +>> +>>To whom who already read those statement before these errata, +>>I badly apologized. I urge you, however, to read that book by +>>yourself to avoid technical problem or misinterpretation which can +>>generate misunderstanding. +>> +>Since you have bothered to post a fairly shoking accusation, I think +>it is up to you to explain, at least, what is the nature of Eisenhower's +>presumed responsibility for the death of those soldiers. +>Did he: +>1) Have them shot No. +>2) Did not supply them with food, when they were under his +>direct authority Yes and no. He put them at a lower priority for food than other groups (allied soldiers, civilians in former occupied countries). It has to be understood that the german surrender did not make things magic and right in europe. Most of europe was either flattened or wrecked as a result of the war. Normal systems of food distribution and transport were just not working. In such a situation, you have to set priorities for who your going to help first and most. The people involved decided to put german POW's at a lower priority, but they did not try to starve them. Lower rations != starvation. +>3) Did not make an effort to aid them, even if they were not +>under his authority I believe they did the best they could under the circumstances. Many german civilians also suffered and died during the same period. You have a flattened europe where nothing works, you have millions of men in uniform in europe that must be fed and supported....and which you have to figure out how to get home as quickly as possible. +>Or something else. The problem with this issue is although there may well be some truth in what is being said: 1. The death count is vastly overstated. 2. Putting all responsibility on Eisenhour overstates his position and takes away responsibility from many other people involved in the decisions. 3. The people who like this issue the most are trying to make various german war crimes seem like standard operating procedure for any army. (See, the americans killed millions of disarmed Germans after the war....so what we did during the war to unarmed civilians is what nations do during war.) I'm not accusing the author of this particular book of [3]. I believe that he had good intentions in doing is research, but tried to "make" data to fit his very controversial conclusion in order to sell more books. From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!medusa.hookup.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.world.net!guardian.up.edu!sequent!uunet!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!siemens!princeton!faust!roger Sun Oct 17 20:11:41 PDT 1993 Article: 18231 of soc.history Xref: oneb soc.history:18231 soc.culture.indonesia:3424 Newsgroups: soc.history,soc.culture.indonesia Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!medusa.hookup.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.world.net!guardian.up.edu!sequent!uunet!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!siemens!princeton!faust!roger From: roger@faust.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig) Subject: Re: Book Review - ERRATA ...ERRATA...ERRATA.... Message-ID: <1993Oct15.153834.20786@Princeton.EDU> Originator: news@nimaster Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: faust.princeton.edu Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig) Organization: Princeton University References: <1993Oct11.043522.11922@cs.su.oz.au> <93285.195354IO21067@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> <93286.015329IO21067@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1993 15:38:34 GMT Lines: 57 In article <93286.015329IO21067@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes: >+++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ +++++++ > >Message-Id: >Read "OTHER LOSSES" by James Bacque (1991), you will know how >General Eisenhower, as a commader-in-chief of the European theater >at the end of WW II killed over 1,700,000 disarmed German soldiers. > ^^^^[a] ^^^^^^^^^^[b] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^[c] >Due to technical problem, some words I wrote were missing and some >unwanted ones appeared in the screen. I was astonished to find what >appeared in the screen. The meaning was quite different from what >I meant. Hopefully these errata will help to clarify the statements. >[a] should be: was responsible for mass missing/killing Still nonsense. Bacque can't even do arithmetic; that much is easily demonstrated. >[b] should be: Germans determine that over 1,700,000 soldiers, > alive at war's end, have never returned home. When did the Germans determine that? The *Soviet* government kept its German POWs for ten years; many of them died. This has little to do with General eisenhower, though. >[c] should be: blank (deleted). Try that for the rest of your article. And then ask Bacque: --Where were these soldiers killed? --By whom? Has he ever found an eyewitness? The whole thesis of Bacque's silly book rests on one simple mistake by Bacque: the term "other losses" in prison camp censuses. The term refers to prisoners *released*; not to prisoners killed. Tell me this: of the thousands of Germans who *survived* American prison camps during and after the war, none has ever reported anything like what Bacque talks about. Many of these people are still alive, and can be interviewed. I've got a whole book of oral history of such experiences. Why has nobody ever reported the supposed mass killing? >To whom who already read those statement before these errata, >I badly apologized. I urge you, however, to read that book by >yourself to avoid technical problem or misinterpretation which can >generate misunderstanding. And I urge you to read *any* review of the book by a competent historian. Your librarian will help you find these reviews. The book you bought was reduced in price for a reason: it's trash. Roger From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!medusa.hookup.net!news.sprintlink.net!demon!uknet!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nermal.cs.uoguelph.ca!herman!jcalnan Sat Oct 23 15:43:51 PDT 1993 Article: 18450 of soc.history Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!medusa.hookup.net!news.sprintlink.net!demon!uknet!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nermal.cs.uoguelph.ca!herman!jcalnan From: jcalnan@herman.cs.uoguelph.ca (James E Calnan) Newsgroups: soc.history Subject: Re: Book Review...Baque Date: 21 Oct 1993 21:44:42 GMT Organization: University of Guelph Lines: 14 Message-ID: <2a6vsa$gba@nermal.cs.uoguelph.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: herman.cs.uoguelph.ca X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] One other thing about Baque's scholarship in "Other Losses" that came clear when he was interviewed on Canadian television (on the program "W5") was that his research was so shoddy that he "missed" the explanation for other losses contained in the document folder next to the one where he first encountered the phrase. When he found no other explanation for "other loses," he asssumed that the phrase had sinister meaning. When these examples of shoddy scholarship were pointed out to Baque's academic supervisor (who had only just before said for the camera that he thought Jim's work was great and had written so in the book's introduction) repudiated his student and said that in the light of this he felt it was best to re-evaluate his support for the work. I hope this comment doesn't class me in with the genocide crowd, but I couldn't resist. From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!hookup!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!netmbx.de!zib-berlin.de!uni-paderborn.de!urmel.informatik.rwth-aachen.de!newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de!hauptfl Sun Mar 27 15:25:16 PST 1994 Article: 26948 of soc.culture.german Newsgroups: soc.culture.german Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!hookup!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!netmbx.de!zib-berlin.de!uni-paderborn.de!urmel.informatik.rwth-aachen.de!newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de!hauptfl From: hauptfl@uni-hannover.de (Torsten Hauptfleisch) Subject: Re: Other Losses Message-ID: <1994Mar27.174942.23864@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de> Sender: news@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de (News Service) Organization: Geodaetisches Institut - Universitaet Hannover - FRG X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4 References: Date: Sun, 27 Mar 1994 17:49:42 GMT Lines: 74 ao998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Karl Krech) writes: : : : According to James Bacque's book "Other Losses", more German soldiers : were killed in American and French POW camps after WWII than were : killed on the western front between 1941 and the end of the war. About : one million unarmed German POWs died in these camps. Bacque's well- : documented book uncovers this least welcome secret of WWII and shows : how Eisenhowers obsessive hatred, not only of the Nazi's, but of : Germans, resulted in this tragedy. : Having read the first edition of his book and some other 'second hand' material on treatment of german POWs by allied forces as well I can in no way agree with Bacque's claim that more than 1 million POWs died in french and american custody. The true points in his book are 1) The record keeping by american forces is a mess. 2) Treatment of german POWs by France was criminal (100.000 presumed dead by other sources too) 3) Treatment of german POW by US forces was not according to international standards 4) Eisenhower used legal tricks (POWs reclassified as DEPs etc.) 5) Eisenhower had psychic problem with regard to Germany But in my eyes HE CLEALY FAILS TO GIVE EVIDENCE OF HIS CLAIM OF 1 MILLION DEAD !!!! There's a lot of wild adding, subtracting, estimating and classifying in which even the inclined reader qickly looses the trace. Other solutions to Braque's number enigmas are always possible. For example: US forces allegedly reported more POW camp inmates released than there where re- gistered to make up for the dead. 30 or so pages earlier he states that there was no tag field for the Volkssturm guys on the register field which he views as another attempt to make up the numbers. He nowhere rules out that the several hundred thousand surplus releases stem from that category. Even when he deals with details his (moral?) outrage carries him to far sometimes. In a camp in Alsace the american officers did have their casino rooms redecorated three times in 1945, which provokes Bracque to the remark that they did so while the POWs were starving (non-lethal if I remember correctly). Now, boys and girls, to anybody who's served with the forces it's well known that one of the main objectives of superiors is to keep their men employed. So a more realistic solution here too, and usually such work means extra rations or other advantages also. Old forces habit. BTW, should they feed the POWs with wallpaper and paint? But the most dubious part of his book is the one where he judges other exam- inations dealing with this topic. He, of course, reviews soviet publications postively that support his allegations. Those contrary to his position are eigther inaccurate or blatant politically motivated lies. I remember only two cases. One is that of a red cross office in Bavaria which found out most of the bavarian MIAs were last sighted on the Eastern front. Bracque challenges this with the idea that Bavaria is a small state (wrong) and that Bavarians might have been predominantly sent to the Eastern front ( totally unproven) or that they might not have had time to sent post when redestinated to the Western front (Do I hear laughter?). The other is that of the official federal examination on the treatment of german POWs. Here he declines to say that it's simply a politically fake. That Prof. Maschke and his team questioned ten thousands if not hundredthousands of former POWs in the fifties and sixties and most hints on the question of missing POWs pointed to the Soviet Union is absolutely unwellcome to Bracque so he cooses to debunk it straightforward. Yours, Torsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Torsten Hauptfleisch posting from Geodaetisches Institut Universitaet Hannover hauptfl@castor.gih.uni-hannover.de Nienburger Str.1 hauptfl@pollux.gih.uni-hannover.de D-30167 Hannover From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyber2.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!netmbx.de!netmbx!sanio Sun Mar 27 15:30:20 PST 1994 Article: 26955 of soc.culture.german Newsgroups: soc.culture.german Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyber2.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!netmbx.de!netmbx!sanio From: sanio@netmbx.netmbx.de (Erhard Sanio) Subject: Re: Other Losses Organization: netmbx, Berlin, Germany Date: Sun, 27 Mar 1994 22:03:33 GMT Message-ID: References: Lines: 59 In article ao998@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Karl Krech) writes: > .. >.. . About >one million unarmed German POWs died in these camps. Bacque's well- >documented book uncovers this least welcome secret of WWII and shows >how Eisenhowers obsessive hatred, not only of the Nazi's, but of >Germans, resulted in this tragedy. > The above is definitely untrue. Bacque's book, far from being "well-docu- mented, is based on distorted evidence and irresponsible extrapolations. Bacque took some figures from POW camps with well-known hard conditions (especially the grasslands on the banks of Rhine during the first chaotic weeks) and extrapolated the mortality therefrom onto the total of German POWs on the Western front during the whole period of 1945/46. In one case (French POW camp) he misread the released persons as dead, further on, he failed to recognize that the waste majority of aged "Volkssturm" people and minors caught as AA artillery helpers (Flakhelfer) were registered as POWs but sent home instantly in most cases which explains much better some differences of figures of POWs taken and released than Bacque's speculations do. The total of German POW losses in the West during that time was between 6,000 and 10,000 persons rather than the million asserted for ends of sensationalism, most of them in the provisional camps in May/June, 1945. Most convincing evidence against Bacque's hypothesis is that the "Deutsche Diensstelle" (German registration office for military losses) did register less than 60,000 missing soldiers on the Western front and in the Western part of the Reich during the whole period 1939-1945/46. Those numbers are including missing personnel during the bomb war. As the pensions for the relatives of missing/killed soldiers are based on the data of that office, it would be impossible to hide away hundreds of thousands of MIAs. The assertions about Gen. Eisenhower are most definitely a lie. When the more than 7.6 million POWs emerged (versus 1-2 million expected), the nutritional situation in the whole of Europe was rather critical, and Gen. Eisenhower ordered resupply from the UK (where food was rationed, too), because he was fearing starvation among both the POWs and the population. Maybe he didn't just love the Germans at that time - he did not make them starve anyway nor did he intend or attempt to do so. Ref.: Erich Maschke (Ed.), Zur Geschichte der deutschen Kriegsgefangenen des Zweiten Weltkriegs, Muenchen 1962-1974 Wolfgang Benz and Angelika Schmidt (Ed.), Kriegsgefangenschaft. Be- richte ueber das Leben in Kriegsgefangenenlagern der Alliierten, Muenchen 1991 Deutsche Dienststelle (WASt), Jahresbericht, Berlin 1985, p.20ff. Btw., Bacque's distortions are starting to become just another Neonazi legend. regards, es
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.