Archive/File: people/b/bacque.james bacque.004 Last-Modified: 1994/10/07 From: wmcguire@world.std.com (Wayne McGuire) Message-ID:Date: Thu, 6 Oct 1994 23:35:20 GMT [...] The Economist, Nov 25, 1989 v313 n7630 p102(2) Title: Other Losses ...Mr Wiesenthal emphasises the need for nations to look at their own history, honestly, if they are to be fit to survive. He too will be startled by a new, and singularly nasty, can of worms now opened by a Canadian 20 years his junior, James Bacque. In the last winter of the war, a safe-conduct bearing the arms of the United States and Britain was widely distributed round the German army on the western front. It said: "The German soldier who carries this safe-conduct is using it as a sign of his genuine wish to give himself up. He is to be disarmed, to be well looked after, to receive food and medical attention as required, and is to be removed from the danger zone as soon as possible." As Hitler's Reich disintegrated, hundreds of thousands of German soldiers surrendered to their western rather than to their eastern enemies, believing this would suit their own interests best. Mr Bacque seeks to prove that the safe-conduct just quoted was, so far as the Americans were concerned, a sham; that American policy was to kill off german prisoners of war, renamed "disarmed enemy forces", by starvation; that over 800,000 of them duly died in captivity, concealed as "other losses"--hence his title--in the bureaucrats' reports; and that the secret had lain buried in the United States archives until he dug it out. He writes more sharply than Mr Wiesenthal; he is especially fierce in his condemnation of General Eisenhower, whose memory he clearly detests. His allegations run directly counter to the image that the West has long accepted, of Americans as kindly, friendly, neighbourly; quite apart from the intrinsic improbability that so vast an atrocity could so long have been utterly hidden. This is the sort of story that gives government a bad name, whatever government it is. It is founded on a statistical basis that may not stand up to a closer look, and on points that both diplomatic and economic historians will query--was there for instance really no food shortage in the summer of 1945? But it deserves a reasoned reply, promptly, from a qualified historian. OTHER LOSSES. By James Bacque. Stoddart, Toronto; 248 pages; C$26.95. To be published in Britain by Macdonald Futura in August ============================================================================== Maclean's, Nov 13, 1989 v102 n46 p69(2) Title: Other Losses Authors: Glynn, Lenny; Bemrose, John Other Losses Among the new Canadian books on the War, a few also probe the darker side of the Allies. James Bacque's Other Losses (Stoddart, 248 pages, $26.95) is an investigation into the treatment of German troops who surendered to American and French armies and were held captive in European camps. Toronto-based Bacque claims that up to one million German veterans - as well as many civilians - may have died of exposure, dysentery, starvation and other illnesses in the dark days of 1945. Such claims have created international shock waves (page 75). Bacque argues that those "other losses," an American military euphemism for dead or escaped prisoners, were the victims of deliberate policy at the highest levels of the Allied command. In a foreword, U.S. Col. Ernest F. Fisher, who assisted Bacque in his research, concurs that Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower's "fierce and obsessive hatred not only of the Nazi regime, but of all things German ... passed through the lens of a complacent military bureaucracy $(and$) produced the horror of death camps unequalled by anything in American military history." According to Bacque, most of the deaths occurred after the Germans' surrender and after Eisenhower stripped captives of POW status - and Geneva Convention protection - by redesignating them as "detained enemy forces." Bacque argues that the scale of deaths in the vast open-air camps was either concealed at the time - by calculated miscounting - or covered up in the Cold War 1950s to prevent erosion of the new West Germany's commitment to the NATO alliance. German prisoners, Bacque charges, were denied adequate food and water, medical care and shelter. That treatment produced murderous squalor in U.S. camps. "Nagging hunger and agonizing thirst were their companions," one German prisoner recounts, "and they died of dysentery. A cruel heaven pelted them ... with streams of rain. Amputees slithered like amphibians through the mud, soaking and freezing." Those conditions left as much as a third of the prisoners, handed over to French authorities as reparations-labor, too weak to work. And, in French camps, a further 167,000 to 300,000 died by 1946, Bacque charges. In stark contrast, German casualties were minor among troops captured by the British, the Canadians, or even by Gen. Mark Clark's largely American forces in Italy. The author invites other scholars to carry on his research, flesh out gaps and verify errors - without fearing, as some warned Bacque, that to do so would justify Nazi crimes or spur neo-Nazi movements. Although Bacque's figures may be off - many surrendered Germans could already have been close to starvation - it is difficult to argue with his conclusion that at least some American and French commanders were "sinking toward the evil which we had all supposed we were fighting." ==============================================================================
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.