From uni-bremen.de!gheins Thu Sep 26 08:18:32 1996 Return-Path:Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19960926151002.0069445c@alf.zfn.uni-bremen.de> X-Sender: gheins@alf.zfn.uni-bremen.de Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 17:10:02 +0200 To: From: Gunnar Heinsohn For the free use of "Holocaust Resources" Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 16:11:32 +0200 To: Dr. Terrence Albrecht From: Gunnar Heinsohn Subject: 27th Annual Scholar's Conference on the Holocaust and the Churches (Tampa, March 2-4, 1997) Dear Dr. Albrecht, for the a.m. conference I would like to submit my paper under the topic "Recent Historical Findings and Interpretations". I suggest the= title: WHY AUSCHWITZ? HITLER'S DOCTRINE OF THE THREE WORLD AGES* Summary: [German author's English] Since St. Augustine, Christian philosophy has divided the course of history into three ages: (i) The era "ante legem" (before the law) was the time from the beginning of humankind to the law of Moses. Its barbarity was defined by the absence of the prohibition of killing. (ii) The era "sub lege" (under the law) lasted from Moses to Jesus. It saw the implementation of the prohibition of killing which--in its universal character--included a strict law against infanticide. (iii) The era "sub gratia" (under the grace) began with the "incarnatio" (God's appearance in Jesus) and is supposed to last to the end of days. To Christianity, of course, the first age had the worst reputation. Hitler, however, wanted to recreate it: "In earlier ages there existed the good law of the victors to exterminate entire tribes, entire nations." Hitler's view is supported by historians of warfare. Redistribution of land from the weak to the strong by displacement and annihilation, indeed, was the rationale of war through most of history. Hitler had singled out Judaism with the sanctitiy of life at the core of its ethical code as the main culprit for the erosion of the archaic right to genocide. The German dictator, therefore, had redefined the second era into a period lasting from Moses up to himself: "With our movement the intervening age, the middle age, has come to its end. We terminate a wrong course of mankind. The tablets of Mount Sinai have lost their validity. Conscience is a Jewish invention." During the so-called euthanasia ("mercy killing") of the mentally handicapped, Nazi perpetrators rebuked prostesting clergymen: "The fifth commandment: 'thou shallst not kill', is not a law of God but a Jewish invention." Already in antiquity, the Jews were described as a nation that did not share the Greek-Roman practice of child exposure. It was not before 318 AD that the Jewish law--via its Christiaan adoption--was made the law of the Roman Empire by Constantine the Great. To this day, the Jewish law of the sanctitiy of life forms the deep structure of Western Civilization. It was transgressed time and again. Yet, never but under Hitler was it= repealed. To conquer "Lebensraum" (colonization territory; literally: living space) between Germany and the Ural Mountains, Hitler had declared that "one hundred million Slaws" were disposable. He was fully aware that such a genocidal policy went against all international laws. Ten days before World War II, he--still doubting their resolve--briefed his military leaders that his "SS-formations had received orders to send to death men, women and children of Polish descent and language without pity and mercy. Only thereby will we gain the Lebensraum that we need." Hitler wanted to provide Germany with strategic superiority by 'liberating' her from all ethical constraints. Never again was a German to be tied down by an "infection" with "Jewish conscience" in his nation's conquest of world leadership. This paper argues that the rationale for Auschwitz was rooted in Hitler's aim to eliminate the Jewish code of ethics by means of exterminating all its carriers, i.e., all Jews of blood and flesh but also every Christian or secular person defending the Jewish law [sanctity of live and love commandments]. The German leader made use of each and every variety of anti-Semitism to pursue his goal. Yet, it was an exclusively Hitlerian intention that set the Holocaust apart from all other genocides as well as all other persecutions of Jews. Auschwitz--however twisted the road towards its realization--was the genocide to reinstall the right to genocide. Hitler did not break the fifth commandment, he abrogated it. In the recent scholary controversy regarding the extermination of European Jewry--(i) Hitler provides the clue but we do not understand him versus (ii) Hitler was simply the tool of capitalism or extremely atrocious German anti-Semitism or by other Nazi leaders etc.--the author tries to enlighten the first view without denying the important aspects illuminated by the= second. * Cf. Heinsohn, G., "Warum Auschwitz? Hitlers Plan und die Ratlosigkeit der Nachwelt", Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1995. ------------, "Auschwitz ohne Hitler?", in "Lettre International", 1996, No. 2 (Summer). ------------, "Was wollte Hitler? Auschwitz und die Lehre von den drei Weltzeitaltern", Bremen: Raphael-Lemkin-Institut / Uni-Druck, 1996. Prof. Dr. phil. Dr. rer. pol. Gunnar Heinsohn Universitaet Bremen / FB 11 Raphael-Lemkin-Institut f=FCr Xenophobie- und Genozidforschung Postfach 330 440 D-28334 Bremen GERMANY E-Mail: FAX : [0]412 218 2084
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.