From gvb_hero@ix.netcom.com Fri Jan 19 08:37:00 PST 1996
Article: 20641 of alt.revisionism
Path: nizkor.almanac.bc.ca!news.island.net!news.bctel.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: gvb_hero@ix.netcom.com (Mike Jones )
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: The case for *OPEN* Debate on the Holocaust
Date: 19 Jan 1996 08:27:41 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <4dnklt$rh2@cloner3.netcom.com>
References:   <4d9dhj$3490@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sac-ca7-26.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Jan 19 12:29:23 AM PST 1996

In <4d9dhj$3490@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> gmcfee@ibm.net (Gord McFee) 
writes: 

>
>In , dkeren@world.std.com said:
>
>>
>>Not this old garbage again - Gannon began with it 4 years ago.
>
>>BTW, in case our "revisionists" have once again "forgot" to
>>mention it, this was not an article, but a paid advertisement.
>
>>It's amazing to see this old fool Smith and nazi-boy here *still* 
trying
>>to peddle the "Leuchter report", which is recognized even by
>>"revisionists" as being totally useless. Nothing new under the sun 
(and
>>under the rock).
>
>What this seems to be is bumboy Lemire engaging in a mass "Gannon" post
>campaign.  Every one of the articles is two to five years old and every 
one
>has been shot down repeatedly.  Obviously, in their supreme contempt 
for the
>newer members of this newsgroup, the Nazi scum think they are stupid 
enough
>to be sucked in by this crap.
>
>Let's's see: we have the phony Leuchter, the defrocked Faurisson, the
>never-was Weber, and Mr. Hit and Run himself--Raven.  No wonder they 
lack
>all credibility.
>
>
>
>--
>Gord McFee
>
>
>
>.. I'll write no line before its time(gmcfee@ibm.net)
>-- MR/2 2.26 #331
>
> Dear Sir,
     Are you a victim of marginal cranial development? Who discredited 
Leuchters Report? THE POLISH GOVERNMENT COOBERATED IT! A chemist from 
the Max Plank institute in Germany ran his own tests and confirmed it. 
Is that all you can do to argue your point? Whimsical sarcasims and 
intentional lies are attempts by people like yourself to extracate 
yourself from a discussion your losing. The groups you are 
defending(i.e. the SWC and the ADL) wouldn't think twice about casting 
you to the lions any more than they would a revisionist, if you didn't 
share there opinion on an issue. As to Bradley Smith, I was a guest with 
him on a show about the Holocaust and he is anything but a Nazi as I am 
sure his Mexican wife will attest to. He is a libertarian. I guess when 
your pals are from the Wiesenthal Center everyone who doesn't tow the 
party line must be a Nazi. I think perhaps you would be more comfortable 
at a book burning than I............................................Mike

  'History needs no law to protect it and no one to protect us from it'

                                                            MDJ         
                       
>

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor