Path: news.voyager.net!nntp.netrex.net!gatech!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!news.cc.swarthmore.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!news.enter.net!usenet From: yawen@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: How to get a desired confession Date: 19 Jun 1996 00:08:27 GMT Organization: ENTER.NET Lines: 93 Message-ID: <4q7gdr$o5b@news.enter.net> References: <4q5nbe$9nb@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp9.enter.net X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.) > mgiwer@ix.netcom.com writes: > And holohuggers could produce only personal attacks when I talked about > 1940s interrogation methods. A lie, of course. The results of several careful investigations were printed. None demonstrated any physical abuse. > (TESTIMONY OF KICK, microfilm pages 000145-9). > A: I was here in Dachau from the 6th to the 15th of May, under arrest; > during this time I was beaten all during the day and night... kicked... > I had to stand to attention for hours; I had to kneel down on sharp > objects or square objects; I had to stand under the lamp for hours and > look into the light, at which time I was also beaten and kicked; as a > result of this treatment my arm was paralysed for about 8 to 10 weeks; > only beginning with my transfer to Augsberg, this treatment stopped. A medical report contradicted this testimony. > Q: What were you beaten with? > > A: With all kinds of objects. > > Q: Describe them, please. > > A: With whips, with lashing whips, with rifle butts, pistol butts, and > pistol barrels, and with hands and fists. None of which even bruised the "victim." > A: I was beaten by an interrogation officer. Several prisoners were also > present. I was supposed to tell how many people I shot or hanged. I can > say with a conscience that I never killed a person. Thereupon, I was > beaten over the head with sticks and rubber hoses until I broke down. Medical examination contradicted this witness. All investigating bodies concluded that he was lying. > > (TESTIMONY OF DR. WITTELER, microfilm pages 000327-331). > > A: During my interrogation I had to sit in front of the desk of Lt. > Guth. A spotlight was turned on me which stood on the desk. Lt. Guth > stood behind the spotlight and the interrogation started. "We > know you, we have the necessary records about you..." I started to make > an explanation. I was immediately stopped. I was yelled at. He called me > a swine, criminal, liar, murderer, and that is the way the interrogation > continued. I couldn't give any explanations. I was only told to answer > "yes" or "no"... I was interrupted immediately and told that all I had > to do was answer "yes" and "no". I couldn't even explain it. I was told > to shut up and to answer "yes" or "no"... since it was not like he > thought it was, I had to get up and stand. So I stood up until 1:30 in > the morning - seven hours. Please note that there is no allegation of physical mistreatment. The sentence of this individual was commuted because these methods were considered improper. > > A: No, I answered that it is not correct... this statement was not > written in my presence. It was written in another room. The reporter was > with me in the room all the time, but the statement was > written in another room. So what? Remainder of post, which consists of testimony that the charges Giwer makes are untrue are deleted. Odd, isn't it, that even when Giwer posts something from his nazi sources, they contradict his assertions. There were extensive investigations made into the allegations of physical abuse which Giwer makes. One was made by an independent army commission, one was made by a Congressional committee under the influence of Joe MacCarthy, one was made by Lucius Clay. None found the slightest bit of evidence that the charges of physical abuse were true. Various other methods, such as the prolonged interrogations under bright lights were found to be true and the sentences of those persons commuted. It was also found that these methods were not generally used in the interrogations but were limited to those (like Kick) who were accused of particpating in the Malmedy Massacre. Perhaps now Matty-poo will explain why those methods that he claims were standard, were considered so outrageous that the sentences were commuted. Perhaps he'll just lie and call people names. --YFE --YFE
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.