Path: news.voyager.net!aanews.merit.net!news.gmi.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!netnews.worldnet.att.net!ix.netcom.com!news
From: mgiwer@ix.netcom.com
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Eureka!
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:11:53 GMT
Organization: images incarnate
Lines: 126
Message-ID: <4qgh1b$goh@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4qdnd9$p1s@atlas.uniserve.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tam-fl8-02.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Jun 22  5:14:03 AM CDT 1996
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

hostrov@uniserve.com (Hilary Ostrov) wrote:

>In a recent post - sorry, it's not really worth doing a search to find
>it - but suffice it to say, a certain prolific poster of prattle was
>kind enough to advise us of our failure to recognize his mission
>statement.

>It seems to me, that he has now provided us with an important clue to
>another oversight on our part.  He has informed us that the word
>"holohugger" is an acronym.   I initially came to the erroneous
>conclusion that while he was able to spell "acronym" correctly, he
>didn't have a clue as to the meaning of the word.  But of course, I
>had forgotten this poster's omniscience.

>What he didn't tell us, though, is that the acronym "holohugger" is,
>in fact, an anagram for the acronym HELGOOHURG (Healthy Educated
>Literate Genteel Observer Of History Unravelling "Revisionist"
>Gambits).  Recognizing that he is profoundly deficient in _all_ the
>qualities necessary to be a helgoohurg, and perhaps a little jealous,
>he proffers *his* acronym instead.  

>There it is, folks! Another gambit unravelled!

>Hilary "helgoohurg and proud!"


>=======================
>Hilary Ostrov
>e-mail: hostrov@uniserve.com
>http://haven.uniserve.com/~hostrov/
>Co-Webmaster - The Nizkor Project http://www.almanac.bc.ca/

        Nice try, fat broad.

Return-Path: 
Received: (from smap@localhost) by ixmail3.ix.netcom.com
(8.7.5/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
        id CAA26116; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 02:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d31rz0.stanford.edu(36.76.0.151) by ixmail3 via smap
(V1.3)
        id sma026113; Sat Jun 22 02:55:16 1996
Received: (from rjg@localhost) by d31rz0.Stanford.EDU (8.6.8/8.6.6) id
CAA00284; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 02:56:35 -0700
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 02:56:35 -0700
From: "Richard J. Green" 
Message-Id: <199606220956.CAA00284@d31rz0.Stanford.EDU>
To: mgiwer@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: STANFORD U participating in email harrassment
References: <199606220956.CAA24645@dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <199606220956.CAA24645@dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com>
X-from: Rich Green
Precedence: junk

>At 02:11 AM 6/22/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>>     This one came through five minutes after the post demonstrating that
>>>Greenies bot on the server is supported by Stanford University and they
>>>will do nothing to stop this email harrassment.
>>
>>>     That makes Stanford University the same piece of harrassing shit that is
>>>Greenie is.  
>>
>>>     Of course copies are being sent to root and if there is no response I
>>>will persue the Stanford web site as far as necessary to to inform them
>>>of his use of their computers for the purpose of email harrassment.  
>>
>>>     He thinks he is being clever.  Rather he is making Stanford U a party to
>>>his harrassment.  


>        Very clearly here is the problem. 

>        You have a Richard J. Green who claims to be in your Chemistry
>Department.

>        He has a bot set up so that any mention of his posts by me in
>alt.revisionism results in email to me.  

>        This is a form of harrassment.  I expect it to stop immediately. 

>        I will pursue this as high as possible if it does not cease.  

>        I hope I am making myself clear.  I will go to the accreditation
>board if necessary.  I know what I am doing.  

>        I will send you all of the evidence needed upon request.  I have no
>interest in flooding you at this time.  But this will stop.  


>---------------------------------------------------------------
>     Live fast, love well, and have a glorious Website.

>              http://www2.combase.com/~mgiwer/
>          Commentary from the right side of the curve
>Maintaining http://www2.combase.com/~mgiwer/tech/ (tips and tricks for webs)
> http://www2.combase.com/~mgiwer/mgiwer4/ (eye candy, blantant advertising)
>            http://www2.combase.com/~matt/  (my son)
>http://www2.combase.com/~matt/mega/ (for internet advertising)
========
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: What a clever way to kill people
From: mgiwer@ix.netcom.com (Matt Giwer)
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 21:48:00 GMT


"PAUL WALDMANN: In this small room [at Sachsenhausen] there was a slot
in the wall,
approximately 50 centimeters in length. The prisoner of war stood with
the back of his head
against the slot and a sniper shot at him from behind the slot. In
practice this arrangement did not
prove satisfactory, since the sniper often missed the prisoner. After 8
days a new arrangement
was made. The prisoner, as before, was placed against the wall; an iron
plate was then slowly
lowered onto his head. The prisoner was under the impression that he was
being measured for
height. The iron plate contained a ramrod which shot out suddenly and
poleaxed the prisoner with
a blow on the back of the head. He dropped dead. The iron plate was
operated by a foot lever in
a corner of the room. "
IMT VII - p. 377. 

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor