Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day003.07 Last-Modified: 2000/07/29 Q. We will come to it in a moment. They did stop for a time. They stopped doing what Himmler did not like that Jeckeln had done which was mass, if you like, semi public shootings of people as they go off the trains? A. The footnote which I printed at the end of bundle says "the killing of German Jews stopped for several months after this exchange". Q. Yes, that is common ground between you and me, the killing of German Jews by this method. Maybe it stopped -- A. Mr Rampton, you are putting words in which do not exist -- Q. -- we are coming to your use, I add, your use of the Bruns evidence in a moment, but before we do that, I want you to . P-55 look at these two messages, these two intercepts. There is no evidence in that of any intervention or participation by Hitler, is there? A. -- no. Q. It is all between Himmler and Jeckeln? A. Yes. Q. If you look at the log for the 1st December 1941, I have given you the composite version, having lost -- A. Composite version, yes. This is a composite because it is made up from three or four different sources by the editors. Q. -- by "composite" I meant composed from different pages in the book. A. Yes, December 1st. Q. December 1st. We see when he is making a telephone call he puts "T" is that the editors or is that Himmler? A. That is the editors who put that. Q. That is the editors. At quarter past one on the 1st there is an entry, it must be a telephone call because Heydrich is in Prag? A. It is in my bundle two. Q. The German for Prague is P-R-A-G I take it; is that right? A. Yes. Q. At quarter past 1 he rings SS Obergruppenfuhrer Heydrich in Prag? A. If I may interrupt, we do not know he rang Heydrich, all . P-56 we can say is there was a conversation. Q. Heydrich might have rung him, of course? A. Yes. Q. The first word is scribedamen; is that secretaries? A. That is correct. Q. They have a talk about secretaries, it seems, then they talk about the executions in Riga? A. Yes. Q. Is there any inconsistency in that entry and the suggestion that what they actually talked about was the fact that Jeckeln had not followed the guidelines because he was doing it too publicly? A. That is perfectly consistent. I might add this is the document 24 in -- I am sorry, document No. 14 in my bundle, the original. Q. Yes. You see there is no evidence in that that that phone call to Heydrich, or from Heydrich, is in any way involved or prompted by Hitler, is there? A. No, none at all, but you are setting a trap for yourself I am afraid. Q. Why? A. Because if I may refer back to the second of the messages, page 17 in my bundle, one in which Himmler contacts Jeckeln on December 1st and reads the riot act to him. Q. Yes, we looked at that. A. It says: "The Jews being outplaced to the Ostland are to . P-57 be dealt with only in accordance with the guidelines laid down by myself and/or by the Reichssicherheitshauptamt on my orders." No mention of Hitler here. Q. No. A. So this is vitally important to me. I rely on that to prove that Hitler was not involved in this order. The ordering procedure was not Hitler's. The guidelines were not Hitler's. Q. Mr Irving, one would not expect, given the way in which Hitler's so-called orders and, they are very rarely orders, they are more often just an airy speech at some dinner table, the words "Hitler's orders" in quotes, were, as it were, dispersed down the hierarchical column of the Nazis, you would not expect Hitler to issue precise guidelines about how the Jews were to be treated on arrival or how they were to be killed, would you? A. This is your, evidence you are leading or a question? Q. I am putting it to you that that is right, is it not? A. I rely only on my interpretation of this document that Himmler in a secret message says, they are my order and my guidelines and you have contravened them. When the temptation would surely have been to say you have contravened the Fuhrer's orders and the Fuhrer's guidelines, which is a very strong point I would make because this is the centre point of my own contention. Q. Do you not think that in light of Bruns's evidence the . P-58 guidelines were whatever you do you must make sure it does not come to public attention because public opinion in Germany will not stand for it if it does, and that that is precisely what was discussed between Himmler and the journalist on the train or wherever it was on the 30th November? A. I think that public opinion in Germany would have stood from it from what I know of the Germans -- most Germans would not have batted a eyelash at the knowledge that these mass killings of the Jews were going on. MR JUSTICE GRAY: Well, they were German Jews, I think you agreed earlier on? A. German Jews. MR RAMPTON: They were Berlin Jews. A. Yes, there was certainly nothing that would have caused the Germans problems on the scale that the euthanasia killings were causing in public morale problems. Maybe my interpretation of the morale in Germany is wrong, you will lead evidence later on to contradict me. Q. I think that probably is right. MR JUSTICE GRAY: I am not sure I follow the logic of that, the euthanasia programme did cause unrest to use a neutral term? A. It caused so much unrest, my Lord, that Hitler had to intervene and stop it. Q. Would not the shooting of large numbers of, to put it . P-59 bluntly, healthy Jews, have caused even more unrest, or at any rate as much unrest? A. They are very -- they are parallel programmes and in very many senses. A lot of the killing operations were conducted by the same organizations and the same experts, but the campaign of Dr Goebbels against the Jews, propaganda campaign had, been conducted with very much more vehemence and personal commitment by Dr Goebbels and it had converted a large element of the German, population in my opinion, to anti-Semitism of a vicious and poisonous degree. Whereas his attempt to achieve the same results against the crippled and disabled had been limited just to one or two films and articles. There a film called "Ich Klagean", which was a film about the -- it was a film in which the mentally disabled and crippled were portrayed in a repulsive manner so the public would accustom themselves to idea of putting them out of the way, and this kind of propaganda totally failed with the German public. The doctors went along with it but the general public when they found out about it resisted very strongly euthanasia killings. Whereas the Jews were considered to be, I think, in Germany fair game as a result largely of Dr Goebbels' propaganda. Q. How good is your facility with Heinrich Himmler's spidery Gothic handwriting? A. The handwriting on these pages is not only Himmler, it is . P-60 also his Adjutant who still alive in Munich. Q. Never mind. Let us be precise then and put impersonally, with the spidery handwriting, Gothic handwriting on these pages? A. On these pages, I will have a shot at it, Mr Rampton. Q. No, I just wonder how used you are to looking at it. A. Not recently, but over the last few nights I have had to strain my eyes once again, thanks to your imputations. Q. When did you first see these pages which, apparently, you did not see the whole of the page for 30th November 1941 until 17th May 1998, is that right? A. He maintained three separate continuous records. He kept the pocket diary. Those pocket diaries are scattered around the world. Some are in Israel now, some are in Russia. I found two in the United States and gave them to the German government. He also maintained a telephone log which was a sheet of paper on his disk, like the ones in front of us, on which he would write down on one side the name of the person he was talking to and on other side what they were talking about. Either he or his adjutant would also keep a daily agenda of whom he was to see and when and what they would talk about or what they had talked about. The fourth series of documents by Himmler you will also run into is when he went to see Hitler, he would write down on a sheet of paper his discussion points. . P-61 Q. We are coming to one of those later on today, Mr Irving. Can you turn to page 12? A. I should also explain that these are on microfilm originally in the United States which is the way I used them and accessed them originally in the 1970s. Q. I wan to be clear what it was you had seen when you wrote your books. Can you turn to page 12 in your little bundle? A. Right. This is the telephone conversations of November 30th. Q. Bear with me, if you do not mind, just allow me to ask some questions. What is this a page a copy of? Page 12? A. I just stated that he would have on his desk a sheet of paper on which he would either type or insert in handwriting the words "telephon gesprach" which is T-E-L-E-P-H-O-N G-E-S-P-R-A-C-H. Q. So that is his what we can ---- A. This is his telephone log. Q. What we could perhaps imprecisely call his telephone log? A. Yes. Q. Would you turn over then to ---- A. I was the first person to find and make use of these. Q. That is as may be. A. Well, it is important. Q. On page 14? A. Page 14, yes. . P-62 Q. I ask the same question: is that the same document? It looks different. A. It looks different because that is a photocopy from my blue volume of these which is on the desk at the other end of your bench. Q. I see. A. Whereas the page previously, when I used it as a facsimile in my book "Hitler's War", I had it rephotographed by the German Government from the original in their archives as a photograph rather than as a photocopy. Q. So, looking at page 14, somebody has typed "telephon gesprach Reichsfuhrer SS" from 1st December 1941? A. Yes. Q. Who typed that? A. That was typed by his adjutant. A blank sheet of paper would be typed for him and laid before him with that heading already prepared. Q. But the other one, the earlier one, has not got that? A. He did not have it, no. That is taken straight off the microfilm. I can show that to you on the bound volume. Q. I follow that. Let us understand it. The second one is the thing that he probably keeps in his office? A. I do not think so. He would sometimes use a presheet -- pretyped sheet that his adjutant had typed and sometimes he would just a take a blank sheet of paper if he was in a hurry and write the headings himself. . P-63 Q. Which may be something of the character of the first one. A. That is correct. They are all in the same file, those ones. Q. What I want to know is what you had when you wrote your books. Was it this these two sheets of paper? A. I had those two sheets. Q. You did not have the fuller version which we can now compose? A. It is not a question of the fuller version. The other page that you are referring to was not his telephone log, but his daily agenda, his appointment book, which is in Moscow and which only became available in 1998. Q. We really would get on quicker if you would let me finish the question. I said the fuller version which we can now compose from different sources. As the editors of the Witte book have done, they have used a number of different sources to make a diary for the day. A. Well, they have. They have constructed an artificial diary, yes, a calendar. Q. Exactly, but in the days when you were writing your books, the books which we are talking about, this is all you had, was it? A. Yes. The Witte book, which is the one to the left of your box ----
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.