The Nizkor Project: Remembering the Holocaust (Shoah)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day008.08

Archive/File: people/i/irving.david/libel.suit/transcripts/day008.08
Last-Modified: 2000/07/20

   Q.   Leave out the last----
   A.   Would you not interrupt me, please? They are not talking
        about the mobile gas truck experiment and to try and
        suggest that when I say that the gas chambers did not
        exist, this is a reference to the gas trucks which I have
        here said quite clearly do exist, I think is perverse.
   Q.   Mr Irving, I am going to read it again.  Just one little
        bit.  You have described how Irving looked through a peep
        hole into the back of a bus and he saw a number of
   A.   Eichmann looked through the peep hole.
   Q.    Eichmann saw a number of people being gassed by the

.          P-66

        exhaust fumes.  This is Mr Irving speaking, formally
        speaking, in a corrected or approved version in
        print.  "So I accept that this kind of experiment, that is
        to say, the sort that Eichmann witnessed, and I stress the
        word experiment, was made on a very limited scale, but
        that it was rapidly abandoned as being a totally
        inefficient way of dealing people".
                  Now that, as a statement of history, was just
        rubbish, was it not?
   A.   The very element now turns out to be wrong, yes.
   Q.   So does the experiment.
   MR JUSTICE GRAY:  That has been conceded now, has it not?
   A.   Except that it was abandoned and replaced by other means
        of killing people.
   MR RAMPTON:  The point of my going back to that was this.  You
        said not long ago that you cannot be blamed for making an
        off the cuff answer in answer to a statement in answer to
        a question?
   A.   Yes.
   Q.   That was a wrong answer too, was it not?
   A.   Yes.
   Q.   This is not an off the cuff response to a question?
   A.   This is part of the main talk, yes.
   Q.   I repeat my earlier question, do you not think -- is this
        IHR a reputable and authoritative body?
   A.   Do we wish to discuss that at this time?

.          P-67

   Q.   I just want to know.  Are these conferences attended by
        top notch historians and that kind of thing?
   A.   Yes.
   Q.   They are.  But this is an occasion ----
   A.   I will be producing evidence later on the nature of the
        audience at these bodies and the directors of the
        Institute all have academic qualifications and degrees.
   Q.   I just want to get the flavour of the occasion on which
        you uttered these words.
   A.   Well, I was going to mention that fact.  This is a body of
        incorrigible, shall we say, people whom I am sure the
        Defence would describe as Holocaust deniers, and I am
        rubbing their noses in what did happen, and I think I
        deserve commendation for that.  I am saying, "Here is
        Eichmann describing in his memoirs how he attended a mass
        shooting from such close range that he was personally
        affected in a rather disagreeable way by the shooting that
        went on.
   Q.   Mr Irving, I am sorry, you must try -- I am perhaps not
        making myself clear -- you say this paper was presented at
        a conference of reputable academics and others who may
        take one or other view about the past, but this is a
        serious occasion?
   A.   This is a talk by me to an audience in California, yes.
   Q.   But it is a serious occasion?
   A.   To an audience who do not want to hear me say this.  They

.          P-68

        want to hear me say something totally different.
   Q.   Mr Irving, please, is this a serious occasion or not?
   A.   In what sense?  Is it a collar and tie occasion?
   MR JUSTICE GRAY:  You expect it to be taken serious.
   MR RAMPTON: Do you expect to be taken seriously?
   A.   Yes.  People have gone there to come away improved with a
        knowledge improved, enhanced.
   MR RAMPTON:  So it is quite different from a question and
        answer session at a knock about press conference, is it
   A.   Knock about press conference?
   Q.   K-N-O-C-K about.  You expected what you said to be taken
        seriously by your audience?
   A.   Yes, and it was taken very seriously.
   Q.   What you said was historical nonsense?
   A.   The word "very limited" is wrong.
   Q.   So is the word "experiment".
   A.   I disagree.   They abandoned the gas trucks after a time
        which showed that the experiment did not work.
   MR JUSTICE GRAY:  Well, 97,000 people, is that not rather a
        long experiment?
   A.   On the scale of 6 million, my Lord, which is the figure
        claimed by the Defence.
   Q.   Not by you?
   A.   My Lord, 97,000 is a large figure which we now know about
        from the document which has now been shown to us, the

.          P-69

        documents that have now been shown to us, which, of
        course, I had not seen at that time.  If they abandoned
        the gas trucks method of killing people, as they clearly
        did, and we know from the documents now that it was
        precisely because it turned out to be a totally
        impracticable way of killing people.
   MR RAMPTON:  Mr Irving ----
   A.   I think the word "experimental" is entirely unjustified.
   Q.   Leaving aside for the moment ----
   A.   The idea of experimenting in killing people is grotesque anyway.
   Q.   Particularly if it is to the tune of 100,000 people?
   A.   I agree.  It is actually obscene.
   Q.   Why did you not say that?  Why did you not say, Mr Irving,
         "I have looked at this question.  They have managed to
        get up to 100,000 at least", we know that from the
        documents, "but then they decided that was not a very good
        way of doing it, so they stopped doing it that way.
        Nonetheless, the fact is that they succeeded in killing in
        the East and in the Reinhard camps well over a million
   A.   I always suspected, Mr Rampton, you are not listening to
        my answers, and that is just proof of it.  I told you this
        figure of 100,000 only comes to my knowledge within the
        last few weeks or months.
   Q.   But it was there to be found, was it not?

.          P-70

   A.   Lots of things are there to be found.  I do not have
        of 30 or 40 researchers working at the expense of God
        knows who is paying for the defence in this case,
        through all the archives, trying to find documents to
        prove me wrong.
   Q.   You know about the letter, you have always known about
        letter, of 1st May 1942 from Greiser to Himmler, yes?
   A.   Yes.
   Q.   That is in your books, is it not?
   A.   I have quoted it in my books, yes.
   Q.   And that speaks of "Sonderbehandlung of some 100,000
        in my territory in an action approved by you in
        with Heydrich will be completed in the next two or
   A.   Yes.
   Q.   Experimental?  Sonderbehandlung?
   A.   But, Mr Rampton, this document is quoted in full in my
        books.  That passage is quoted in full in my books.
   Q.   But not in connection with gassing by trucks?
   A.   Well, we do not know from Greiser what method has been
        used to specially treat, if I can use the word, those
        100,000 people.
   MR JUSTICE GRAY:  I thought you accepted earlier on this
        morning -- we can find the reference -- that that was
        actually a reference to gassing?
   A.   From the later documents which are now available, my

.          P-71

        this is plain, but at the time I wrote the book I had
        the 1st May document.  Our knowledge advances by
        particularly now these other archives have been opened
        us.  It cannot be held against me that I did not know
        something in 1970 when I wrote the book which is now
        available at the end of the 20th century.
   MR RAMPTON:  No, I am not talking about the book, Mr
        You knew about the Greiser letter for a long time.  It
        mentions the killing, or proposed killing, of 100,000
        in the Warthegau from 1st May in a couple of months,
        or three months?
   A.   Yes, but we do not know what methods have been used to
        dispose of them.
   Q.   Please, Mr Irving, I have not finished my sentence.
        is all that is in the book because you did not know
        the Turner letter of 5th June 1942, you tell us.  I am
        in a position to contradict you?
   A.   Well, of course, can I tell you when I first got the
        Turner letter?  That was in 1977.
   Q.   The Turner letter in 977?
   A.   I have to state that, yes.  I was sent page 1 of the
        Turner letter, I believe, by Mr Sereny round about
   Q.   By the time of the second edition of Hitler's War you
        know about it?
   A.   Yes.  But whether I would have read it in detail or

.          P-72

   Q.   Do I find it in that?  I am asking that as a
        open question to which I do not know the answer.
   A.   I think you will probably ...
   Q.   I think I had better check it.
   A.   I must make this quite plain.  I have had the Turner
        letter in my possession probably for 23 years.
   Q.   Yes.  So?
   A.   But the Turner letter by itself is a very suspect
        until you see the subsidiary documents that have
        available since then.
   Q.   Will your Lordship forgive me?  I am just trying to
        in the index to see whether there is any reference to
        this.  If there were a reference, Mr Irving, it would
        in the later part of the book, would it not?  I mean
        the 1991 edition?
   A.   Are you enquiring whether I used Turner letter in
        edition of the Hitler book?
   Q.   Yes.
   A.   I do not believe I did.
   Q.   Obviously not the first one because you told us ----
   A.   I do not believe I did.
   Q.   You do not think you did?
   A.   No.
   Q.   Can I put it to you that you suppressed it?
   A.   You can put it to me like that, but, obviously,
        I suppressed many hundreds of thousands of documents

.          P-73

        I wrote a book of that magnitude.
   Q.   What was that?  I am sorry I missed it.
   A.   The Turner letter has been subjected to the most
        scrutiny by people both yeh and nay, if I can put it
        that, and when there is a document like that, one's
        instinct is to steer clear of it.
   Q.   Well, now there is another letter which we saw
referred to
        in paragraph 5.2.2 of Professor Browning.  That is the
        letter about the functioning of the trucks of 5th June
        1942.  That is not the Turner letter.  This a
   A.   On what page is that?
   Q.   It is page 38, and the body of the report is
translated at
        the bottom of the page.  As I say, I have absolutely
        intention of reading that out whatsoever.
   A.   Yes, but you are not implying that I have had that
        document in my possession until a few weeks or months
   Q.   You have only recently had that document?
   A.   Yes.  That is what I say.  When you see a document
        that, then you are more inclined to accept the Turner
        letter as being genuine.
   Q.   What about the Greiser letter?
   A.   The Greiser letter, there has never been any doubt as
        that, the authenticity, because it was an American
        and it is microfilmed with the Heinrich Himmler
   Q.   But you did not think before wading in and saying that

.          P-74

        there were only a very limited number of experimental
        truck gassings or bus gassings at a serious conference
        historians, you did not pause to consider what it
might be
        that the Turner letter told you which you had at that
        time, indeed, you had when you wrote Hitler's War '91?
   A.   Well, I could have expatiated at length at that
        on the Turner letter, and I could have pointed to the
        things that point to its authenticity, but also at
        length to the things that give rise to be dubious
        it; for example, the very weird SS runes that had been
        hand typed in and things like that.
   Q.   Mr Irving, as you see and as you know perfectly well,
        as I will, no doubt, have to put to you again along
        the road, you are all too eager to jump on anything,
        dignify it with your authority, that suggests that the
        scale of Nazi criminality during the war, whether it
        the killing of Jews or the responsibility of Adolf
        anything that seems to diminish or reduce that
        proposition, size of the crime, or the level to which
        criminality went up?
   A.   Mr Rampton, we are talking about 97,000 on one case.
        are saying that I have suppressed that fact and yet I
        quoted in full the Greiser letter which talks of
        it is precisely the same one.  I believe the belief is
        that it is exactly the same victims we are talking
        so you cannot accuse me of having suppressed that

.          P-75

        particular atrocity.  I quoted the Greiser letter and
        I quoted the figure.
   MR JUSTICE GRAY:  When you say the "same Jews", do you mean
        97,000 equals the 100,000?
   A.   A part of the 100,000.  I believe that is the
        that Mr Rampton is trying to make.
   MR RAMPTON:  My Lord, I would like, if I may, just one
        when I get the reference to look and see what it is
        Mr Irving said about the Greiser letter.
   MR JUSTICE GRAY:  It says 1991 Hitler's War.
   MR RAMPTON:  Yes, my Lord.  Page 426.
   MR JUSTICE GRAY:  Page 426.
   MR RAMPTON:  Yes, 426.

Home ·  Site Map ·  What's New? ·  Search Nizkor

© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred. Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.