Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.revisionism,soc.history,soc.culture.australian,soc.culture.british Subject: LaRouche on the British Parasite, or "Why Won't Anyone Listen to Me?" Summary: Lyndon LaRouche explains how the British (who are really Jews) are responsible for all the world's ills....including the Balkan war, WWI and WWI, The WTC bombing, Waco, Somalia and evil everywhere (LONG!) Reply-To: kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca Followup-To: alt.conspiracy Organization: The Old Frog's Almanac, Vancouver Island, CANADA Keywords: LaRouche,Thatcher,British File: belzec belzec.11 Last-modified: 1993/03/01 XRef: belzec index Lines: 564 Archive/File: larouche larouche.017 Last-modified: 1993/05/07 XRef: index larouche, larouche larouche.ihr Before providing you with specific examples of LaRoucheThink, I'd like to offer some background material provided by Dennis King's "Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism." (Having reviewed all this stuff, I think LaRouche is right - he _shouldn't_ be in prison - he belongs in a mental hospital.) King: Essentially, LaRouche regards the British as having a relationship to the human race similar to that of parasite to host. In his own words: "The ruling British elite are like animals - not only in their moriality, but in their outlook on knowledge. They are clever animals, who are masters of the wicked nature of their own species, and recognize ferally the distinctions of the hated human species." He has returned to this idea again and again: "I know the British mind very well - it is a lower order of mentality, which I can study as I watch the fish in an aquarium." It is the "mind of a species inferior to myself." The British are "a pack of animals" and "a different, alien species." The are the "avowed enemies of the entire human species." As for their Zionist philosophy, it emphasizes the "sensual appetites of impulsions of a racial group, making that racial group self-defined as in moral likeness to a lower beast." LaRouche desciple Chris White echoes these sentiments. The British are a "specific form of lower life," "not human," "the end product of a specialized process of genetic engineering" that produced "congenital deficiencies and brain damage" as early as the 17th century. In "The Elite That Can't Think Straight" LaRouche portrays the biological struggle as a relentless personal contest between himself and the top oligarchs. Their "inner circles," he says, recognize him as "the ancient and feared adversary of their own evil species" and as their "potential destroyer." When they see the influence of his work, "they tense, growling with such phrases as 'potential danger,' 'more dangerous than Hitler,' 'kill it before it succeeds in getting a real foothold in shaping events.'" Whether or not LaRouche actually believes himself to be the new Hitler as implied, he approved the publicatioin of Chris White's 'The Noble Family' (1978), which said just about everything left to be said: "Let us speedily expedite the urgently necessary task of freeing humanity from the grasp of that specific form of lower life before we are destroyed by them or enslaved by them. Let us joyfully ensure that the representatives of the British system are destroyed so that humanity might live..." And White concluded: "Those of us who should know better have been tolerant of such creatures for far longer than has been good for the rest of us. Let us, with ruthlessness, ensure that the job is done correctly now." LaRouche's racialism, like Hitler's, doesn't just target the British. In a softer form it applies to most of the human race, whom LaRouche accuses of being mired in sheeplike bestiality and thus requiring close surveillance by LaRouchian shephers. He professes great compassion for the sheep. Their subhuman state is the fault of the British. Once the latter are removed from the scene, the sheep's heredity can be changed, raising future generations to the level of true humanity. (King, 288-289) Thanks to John Covici (EIR Talks to Lyndon LaRouche 02/01/93), we have had a grand opportunity to see LaRouche's paranoia regarding the British as it exists today. Consider these snippets, from message-id <253-PCNews-124beta@ccs.covici.com>, which John published on February 7, 1993 (Request larouche EIR.020193 for the entire "interview") -> LaRouche explains how the British were responsible for the (US) Civil War... There have been movements throughout history which are against what the United States represented, movements such as the 1815-1816 conferences at Vienna and Paris which established the Holy Alliance. The policy of Castlereagh was part of that in England, and the continuation of that by people like Palmerston. You had the attempt to drive the United States, under British direction, from the kind of republic that Alexander Hamilton and George Washington and so forth conceived, into a Confederate-style slave society, in which the poor whites and even the planters were culturally little more elevated in their cultural conditions of life than the chattel slaves. -> LaRouche explains how the British are behind the Balkan problem.. Now, a competitor of Marx, by the name of Bakunin, who was also a buddy of that Nazi, the composer Richard Wagner, and also in a sense a buddy of that other Nazi Friedrich Nietzsche, the deconstructionist; these people were simply assets of Palmerston's Mazzini operation, the Young Europe operation, the radicals. And they spread this Pan-Slavic garbage into Russia and into southeastern Europe through these Freemasonic lodges which were the Mazzini-type lodges run by the British. We had this Serbian Black Hand society, all these kinds of things that started the Balkan Wars ultimately of the late 19th century and the early 20th century. The same people are up to the same thing all over agian. This is not something that was cooked up yesterday in somebody's kitchen or somebody's spook think-tank; these are movements and tendencies and operations and brainwashings, which have been kicking around for hundreds of years. -> In case we didn't get it, LaRouche adds the following on February 18th (Message-ID: <260-PCNews-124beta@ccs.covici.com>) (Request larouche EIR.021893 for the complete "interview") What is being done in former Yugoslavia, is that from the beginning, from 1989-1990, the British and U.S. governments not only supported but helped to direct the aggression of the Serbian fascist formation around Milosevic, the present president of Serbia, to commit genocidal crimes, first against Croatians and then against the Bosnians, and they are now ready to go against Kosova and ready to go in Macedonia or, as it is called, Makedonija. The United States is fully supporting that, as is the British government. There {is} an understanding with Moscow on this matter. Moscow is making itself more vocal, but that is a part of Moscow making itself more vocal on many things, including, as we may note, Iraq. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits run Israel... The Middle East is a mess because we want to have it a mess. The Middle East is, to this day, despite the U.S. bungling and interventions in the area, still run by the old British intleligence crowd. And they wish to have it a mess. Israel is to a large degree {controlled} by this crowd. The Israelis would not want to admit it; but if you know how things work, you understand how it is controlled. And they are making it a mess. I do not think that anyone could come up with a Middle East policy which is going to work by itself. For example, I have worked on policies for years, and worked with Israelis and Arabs and others to try to get these into motion, which are economic development policies of mutual benefit to all in that region, and therefore, by having a common intererst in something of mutual benefit to all, particularly in economics, one can hope that you can build confidence and build peace. Unfortunately, this has not worked so far because of this kind of British control I talked about. -> LaRouche explains how the ADL is controlled by the British... First of all, the ADL is not an independent organization which makes its own policy. The ADL is an offshoot of a Confederate organization, the B'nai B'rith, which was founded in 1842-1843 in Charleston, South Carolina, as a subsidiary of Palmerston's organization, and actually that branch of the Southern Freemasonry was working with Lord Palmerston, was under his direction, and called itself, as the case of Albert Pike exemplifies in this, ``Young America,'' which was the offshoot of Mazzini's ``Young Europe.'' This organization has always worked for a faction of British intelligence. As a shorthand, call it the Castlereagh-Palmerston faction. It has never served an independent Jewish interest, contrary to its own publicity. It has not. For example, the deployment against us, against me in particular, {was ordered} from New York City by British intelligence through a British intelligence agent, Canon Edward West of the New York Cathedral of St. John the Divine. Canon West was also a coordinator for British intelligence's Hospitaller of St. John organization, the Knights of Jerusalem. And that is the way it has been run. -> LaRouche now tells us that the British don't completely control the ADL - the KGB is in there pitching! <260-PCNews-124beta@ccs.covici.com> And the ADL, which is partly a Soviet KGB asset, was also involved in that--the Anti-Defamation League. But that was on the ground, not on the higher level. ...the difference between my being in prison and being harassed on the street, so to speak, was essentially this agreement between Moscow and Washington, with London consulting. And that is the way it has stood up to the present time. -> In <260-PCNews-124beta@ccs.covici.com>, LaRouche explains how the Brits destroyed the Soviet economy... What Bush did and what the British and others did, beginning 1989 or 1990 with the fall of the [Berlin] Wall, was the worst possible thing. It was the thing I warned against in 1988 in the rather widely celebrated Berlin address I made on this subject about the imminent collapse of the Wall, the imminent reunification of Germany with Berlin as the prospective capital and the problems inside the Soviet economy. What they did, was they said: Okay, the Russians are weak, they have to accept our diktat to some degree. We are going to destroy Eastern Europe and its economy. We are going to destroy the former Soviet economy by these kinds of pressures. What they should have done--which they thought was being too generous--was to cooperate in developing Eastern Europe, especially Poland, which they wrecked. The United States and Britain have {wrecked} Poland, almost to an irrecoverable level. They have wrecked eastern Germany by putting pressure on Germany to do so; and they tried to wreck the former Soviet Union. What this did--instead of following the development policy which I had proposed, the so-called ``food for peace'' policy--was to put the Russians into an {adversarial} mood against the United States in particular. And what is building up now there in the so-called return of the hard-liners, is that a bunch of people are saying, ``Okay. The United States and Britain are going to collapse''--and they are right. They are going to collapse at the present time. They say, ``We have to wait. And we are going to be a superpower again.'' That is the strategic threat. -> LaRouche explains how the British are destabilizing Italy, in conjunction with the Russians and the Yanks, and attempting to deliberately start a war (Request larouche EIR.030893 for the complete "interview") First of all, as we have discussed in previous broadcasts, the crisis in Italy is engineered from the outside by a network which is Anglo-American in character and Freemasonic in flavor, that is, the British Freemasons, together with the Southern Jurisdiction types in our own country, are key in orchestrating this destabilization in Italy. This is being done as a part of the operation which London orchestrated, together with Gorbachov, in launching the Serbians, partly through London, partly through Gorbachov, partly through people like Brent Scowcroft and [Lawrence] Eagleburger, who are close collaborators of these Serbians, to start a war on the Southern Flank of Germany. Because suddenly, at that point, in 1989-1990, Mrs. Thatcher announced that Germany was the major danger; and therefore, Bush and Thatcher blew the greatest opportunity in 20th century history by turning away from the opportunity to develop Eastern Europe and Russia along new lines, through economic cooperation, and instead used Russia, in part--that is, Gorbachov and Marshal [Dmitri] Yazov--to launch the Serbians in this hideous war against other peoples of former Yugoslavia, the Milosevic group. [...] They are simply trying to destroy and discredit all the parties. That is being done through a law which was imposed by the occupying powers, the Anglo-Americans, at the end of World War II, in which, under pressure, Italy passed this law, under which there can be no competent financing of parties without resorting to things which are considered illegal or quasi-illegal; and that is being used just to pull down the system at this point. -> LaRouche continues to explain how the Brits and Yanks have started the Balkan war...(EIR.030893) What has happened, because the United States and Britain, under Bush and Thatcher, unleashed various regional wars, such as the Balkan war, which they sponsored with Gorbachov, is that we have gone back to a new version of the kind of conflict which existed prior to 1989. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits and Russians "Unleashed the Serbian Fascists," and takes a shot at the Israelis at the same time (EIR.030893): Ridley was nothing but the bark of the Margaret Thatcher dog. He was her minister and even though she was a rather nasty person, she as head of government in Britain, could not say openly, diplomatically, the kinds of things she could have some of her ministers say. So she had this scoundrel, Conor Cruise O'Brien and Nicholas Ridley, one of her ministers, spew out this venom, talking about a Fourth Reich. Many people will recall, if they look back at the newspaper files, they will find that it was this Fourth Reich formulation and the negotiations between Thatcher and Gorbachov to unleash the Serbian fascists and the kind of genocide and other war crimes being committed in Yugoslavia today. This was all the same package. You will find certain Israelis who were supporting the Serbian fascists in this genocide, were using the same formulation: ``Fourth Reich,'' ``Fourth Reich.'' -> LaRouche explains how the Brits bombed the World Trade Center (EIR.030893) But certainly, that bombing could not have been done by a bunch of Arabs. This is a highly sophisticated operation. There are a few people, a few teams in the world, that could have done that--relatively few. Most of them are known; this was not simply done by that blind, 80-year-old sheikh. That sheikh is a British intelligence asset. We have his pedigree; he is British intelligence. He was brought into the United States in 1991 by the State Department and protected by the State Department, up until these recent events, up until a few days ago. So the man was a protected State Department asset actually owned by British intelligence out of the old Arab Bureau network. -> and blames the Aussies for Waco while he's at it... Somebody else has done it; it is done against the Clinton administration, just as that dirty operation that was done down in Waco, which was run out of Australia, of all places, in order to set that thing up--out of Australia. And used a convicted a felon as the complainant to get the thing moving. [...] The case in particular starts {in Australia.} A fellow called Isi Leibler in Australia who is an ADL asset, who has recently been disowned by the Mossad, and his circle, have control over certain sections of the Australian government. Through a department of the Australian government, a misinformational report was sent--very alarming and very electrifying--to the U.S. State Department. The U.S. State Department, because it involved weapons, turned the case over to ATF. .. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits put Khomeini in power... We should have to recognize that the trigger point, the detonator point, for this lunacy, was that the United States and Britain put a British asset, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in Iran. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits are destabilizing Clinton and complaining about the administration "not having the right Jews." We have heard Lord Owen, the British ambassador, screaming the most undiplomatic screaming against the United States on the territory of the United States over this policy, not just the Bosnian policy, but over the British policy of creating this one-world order. And [President] Clinton, who may not be the most profound in his thinking, is going on the basis of saying he would like to be re-elected; and he is thinking about being re-elected, at least instinctively, while he is President. And he is trying to respond to this, and that in a way which seems to him to be the response of a guy who wants to be re-elected. So he is doing things--he is backing off like a weathervane, often. But he is doing things; and he represents a destabilization factor from the standpoint of certain Anglo-American [Establishment] and other circles, and they are not particularly happy with him. They have made that very clear, particularly from some of the neo-con[servative] attacks on Clinton for not having the right Jew. He had enough Jews in the administration, but they said he did not have the right Jews, and that kind of stuff. -> LaRouche reiterates how the Brits and Bush unleashed the Serbs: The problem today, which comes to Clinton's doorstep, is the fact that Thatcher and Bush, principally, as the responsible heads of government and state, respectively, destroyed all of the good work that Reagan did in this connection, by their crazy policy toward attacking Germany by unleashing Serbia against the southern flank of Europe and by imposing insane conditions upon Russia and Eastern European countries which are pushing Russia today into an adversarial emotional posture against the United States and Britain, with Russia still having the world's largest and second-largest naval- and land-based rocket arsenal. -> LaRouche explains how Clinton and the Brits are forcing the Russians into a hostile position...(EIR.032493) As I said before, he can go my way, or it will be totally ineffective. As long as Clinton and the Thatcherites in Britain succeed in continuing to impose the so-called reform reform program of IMF conditionalities upon Russia under the present policy guidelines, which were set into motion under Thatcher and Bush, which are called the Project Democracy guidelines, the situation in Russia will deteriorate and we will very rapidly have the emergence of Russia as a thermonuclear power--which it already is--with a {resolve} and a {hostile emotional projection} against the United States and Britain, particularly, for what the Russians will say and feel that the West has done to them, in the sense of betrayal. -> LaRouche explains how Thatcher and "British interests" murdered a German banker (EIR.032493) What happened is that Thatcher and Bush, as the policy carriers of that period, went in the opposite direction. Deutsche Bank banker Alfred Herrhausen, who proposed a policy similar to mine, was killed, assassinated, by British interests because they did not like what he was offering. They did not like mine, either. -> LaRouche explains that Thatcher is an idiot and an criminal, and that Yeltsin is an "agent of the Anglo-American policies" (EIR.032493) Q: As you are talking, I hear Margaret Thatcher and I hear the gurus of the Heritage Foundation and others saying, ``Isn't it better that we now have the former Soviet Union in a weakened condition, and wouldn't the policies that you're proposing, strengthen the former Soviet Union, an adversary, and create more difficulties for the United States?'' MR. LAROUCHE: Beginning 1983, I warned these idiots--and I use the term idiots because the criminality of what they have done is beyond belief when we consider the dangerous world we live in today--I warned them that if they went with that kind of policy toward Russia, that what they would do, is they would see the fall of communism. That is exactly what the Yeltsin crisis is. The Yeltsin crisis is not caused by something inside Russia. The Yeltsin crisis is caused by the fact that Mr. Yeltsin has been seen, by the Russians, {as the agent of the Anglo-American policies which the Russian people and leading institutions have grown to hate.} -> LaRouche explains how the Brits have been plotting agains the Germans, and caused the Balkan Wars, and explains how the Serbs are really agents of the British... From 1880 on, the British became very excited about what they saw as the threat that German economic development, which was vastly surpassing anything in Britain, would again ``infect'' Russia with industrial and agricultural development. So in order to prevent that, they developed the doctrine of geopolitics. What they used was pan-Slavism and French revenge-ism[sic] after the defeat of France in the Franco-Prussian War, as motivations for building an alliance against Germany while also carving up the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. This was triggered, by British agents and their friends in Venice and in Salonika, as the Balkan Wars of the nineteenth century and the Balkan Wars of the twentieth century. So you had Russians drawn into the Balkans by an affinity with Serbians, which is called pan-Slavism. So the Russians were taking the side of the Serbs against the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Ottomans. Then you had the French, who were also in deep through the Freemasonic connections with the Serbian terrorists of that period, the Black Hand Society and so forth; and all this all became a division of Europe against itself, which Britain saw as preventing Europe from engaging in the kind of economic development, which would make Eurasia a successful competitor to the worldwide power of the British Empire. When Germany was reunified, we heard from Margaret Thatcher's circle, from Conor Cruise O'Brien and from the now recently deceased Nicholas Ridley, the cry of ``Fourth Reich,'' the argument that Germany was now going back to take over all of Europe, and therefore Britain had to get the Russians and the Balkans, the Serbs in particular, to go at Germany. They got Bush into support of this policy; and so Milosevic, who is essentially a British Intelligence asset, and some Serbs who were also Russian assets, were co-deployed by an agreement between the Thatcher government and Gorbachov to launch this war in the Balkans--in the same way that British Intelligence had launched the Balkan Wars preceding World War I to ignite World War I. -> LaRouche explains how the British are responsible for nearly everything (EIR.033093) The problem is this. Because of the mess which Mrs. Thatcher and George Bush led in making of the great opportunity which opened up at the end of 1989, with the crumbling of the so-called Iron Curtain, we have a situation in which governments around the world have deteriorated to the point that no one really is on top of the situation. They have the power to command, but they do not have the power to address any problems. This is the case in Britain, which is essentially a disgusting mess from the standpoint of government. Germany: Chancellor Kohl is trying to hold on to his seat, but there is not much else going on around him. Italy: the government is crumbling because of an Anglo-American, essentially British but Anglo-American, destabilization of the whole political system of Italy, through covert operations. A similar process is being launched in Germany now, though not as intensively or extensively as in Italy. -> LaRouche explains how stupid Americans are, how they have been brainwashed into thinking incorrect thoughts...and how the Brits and Yanks put Hitler into power...how the Brits started WWI... For the American citizen to understand this issue, we have to look into some of the brainwashing, and I think that term has to be used, of the majority of American citizens themselves. For example, most American citizens still believe that Germany caused World War I and World War II. Of course, in the case of World War II, Hitler was a terrible problem and did take the actions which actually led to the general warfare. But the causes of World War II go back to about 1932-33, when a group around Averell Harriman and company in the United States, and similar people in Britain allied to Harriman, actually put Hitler into power, to overthrow the von Schleicher government. Had they not overthrown the von Schleicher government, there would have been no World War II in that form; there would have been no Hitler. So in that sense, the fact is, that the United States and Britain caused World Wars I and II. Britain is primarily responsible for World War I, and was a co-author, and probably the initiating co-author, of the design for what became World War II. {This is directly contrary to all typical American belief.} They are taught in school, they are taught by the news media, etc., etc., etc.; and when you tell a typical American and show him even the facts which show that George Bush's father, Prescott Bush, as the general manager, chief executive officer, for Averell Harriman, {moved the money into the Nazi Party to put Hitler into power,} he'll say, ``No, that can't be true. I couldn't believe that.'' But it's true. -> LaRouche explains how the Brits are destabilizing _everyone_ The same thing that happened then, is happening now. {Before} the unification of Germany occurred, you had Mrs. Thatcher, with her Conor Cruise O'Brien and her minister, now recently deceased, Nicholas Ridley, insisting that the great danger to world peace was the reunification of Germany; and the term used was Fourth Reich. That was a signal for both U.S. intelligence services and British intelligence services to do a number of things to destabilize all of Europe, which they did. And at the same time, the British and some of the Americans worked with Gorbachov; and Gorbachov, partly through Minister [Dmitri] Yazov, the defense minister, set loose certain U.S. and British assets in former Yugoslavia--that is, the fascist faction of Milosevic in Serbia. They launched the war on what is called strategically the southern flank of Central Europe. The purpose of this war and these other measures was to weaken the governments and economies of western Europe, while weakening the economies, and actually ruining the economies, of the former communist states of eastern Europe, including Poland, which they have done. Poland is down to about 30 percent of the level of economy it was at the time that it came out from under Soviet domination; and to collapse also of the former Soviet Union. This has produced this dangerous war-threatening situation, and that is where we stand: that is where the problem lies. One has to understand that; and somebody is going to have to take the American people by the ears and say, ``cut out this nonsense, take your fairy tales about German war guilt, throw them away; yes, the Germans under the Kaiser were a bunch of fools, and fell into the trap; Hitler was an American creation, who did provoke the war, who did horrible things, no question about it. But let's look at how these things are set up, and not just look at what happens once they are set up.'' -> LaRouche once again expounds on British guilt regarding Serbia... The point is, we cannot tolerate this mess. There are war crimes. Genocide is going on in the Balkans. Eagleburger and Scowcroft and the other Bush leaguers, the Kissinger-Bush league types, together with Carrington's crowd and Lord Owen's crowd, and Britain, are responsible for this mess. We have to recognize that the Europeans and the Americans committed a great crime in tolerating this situation for as long as we have. We are going to have to take various kinds of measures. Work Cited LaRouche, Lyndon. EIR Talks With LaRouche. UseNet: alt.activism, Message-ID's and archived filenames as cited above. King, Dennis. Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism. New York: Doubleday, 1989
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.