From oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!deep.rsoft.bc.ca!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!ccs!covici Mon Aug 16 06:26:42 PDT 1993 Article: 25908 of alt.activism Path: oneb!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!deep.rsoft.bc.ca!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!ccs!covici From: covici@ccs.covici.com (John Covici) Reply-To: covici@ccs.covici.com Newsgroups: alt.activism Subject: EIR Talks to Lyndon LaRouche 08/14/93 Message-ID: <370-PCNews-125beta@ccs.covici.com> Date: 9 Aug 93 3:25:51 GMT Organization: Covici Computer Systems Lines: 793 - ATTENTION FREE LAROUCHE ATTENTION FREE LAROUCHE - The wider LaRouche's presence, the greater the pressure to get him free. Put LaRouche on radio, with a new interview each week. The transcript below is from a weekly hour-long interview formatted with news breaks and commercials. To get LaRouche on radio, calls from people within stations' listening area can be most effective. Program director and general managers are usually the ones to make decisions about programming. Get interested contacts with businesses or products to advertise on the stations during the EIR Talks With LaRouche hour. This provides greater incentive for the stations to carry the program. Any radio station on the planet can air the weekly interviews with LaRouche. The EIR Press Staff can provide weekly tapes for broadcast. Or stations can pull the program down from satellite, using the coordinates below. The interviews are broadcast Sundays on satellite from 6:06 PM to 7:00 PM Eastern. For More Information: Frank Bell, Press Staff. Galaxy 2, 74 Degrees W Trans 3 74.9 mHz NB, SCPC 3:1 Companding, Flat or Satcom C-1, 137 Degrees W Trans 2 7.5 mHz Wide Band Video Subcarrier The LaRouche files are now available by automatic list service. To get an index of the files, you must subscribe to the LaRouche mailing list. To do this, send a message to listserv@ccs.covici.com with a line saying subscribe lar-lst After that, to get an index, say index lar-lst ``{EIR'}s Talks With Lyndon LaRouche August 4, 1993 Interviewer: Mel Klenetsky MEL KLENETSKY: Welcome to {Executive Intelligence Review'}s Talks With Lyndon LaRouche. I'm Mel Klenetsky. We're on the line with Mr. LaRouche from Rochester, Minnesota. ``There Is a Worldwide Crash in Progress; We Are In A Depression Already'' Mr. LaRouche, the developments in Europe around the economic situation are becoming quite dramatic. George Soros apparently did not get his way with his predictions and his efforts to collapse the French franc. The EC finance minister is widening the band of currency evaluations from 2.25 to 15 percent. The French Nobel Prize economist is warning of a new crash, 1987- style; what do we have in Europe? Are we looking at another crash? MR. LAROUCHE: Well, we're looking at some other things. Yes, we are looking at a crash, of course, not just in Europe. We're looking at a worldwide crash. There are a number of things that can detonate it. The crash is in progress. We are in a depression already; contrary to some wishful publicity in various newspapers and from various governments, the world is in a crash. We face, for example, the effect of the Midwest floods. The United States concentrated a great deal of the world's food supply in a nine-state area in the United States, centered around soy and other grains, soy and regular grains. This whole area is now in jeopardy, as a result of an unusual weather pattern and lack of preparation for this problem. There is going to be a zooming price of food on the world market September-October, somewhere in that period. This is going to help blow out the entire financial situation, which is already in jeopardy. At the same time, the underlying, immediate crisis, is the so-called derivatives crisis; that is, we have a ballooning financial bubble which is unsustainable, which is coming to the end of its life anyway, a balloon that's about to pop, and a lot of things that are going to pop it. Now George Soros, who is essentially a front for a British- directed group of international speculators, is the key figure here. He is not the person behind the scenes, but he's the key figure out in front on this derivatives. He's attacking every currency in Europe, and will attack the dollar, if he isn't eliminated from the scene before then. So the British and others are now talking my line a bit, about putting a transaction tax, a sales tax, so to speak, on derivatives transactions as a way of either shutting this thing down or bringing it under control to some degree, while getting some revenue to balance some very badly unbalanced budgets, not only in the United States, but around the world. We are on the edge of the worst financial crash of the twentieth century. Exactly when that will come, is uncertain, but it will come somewhere between the fall and next spring; and it's already in process. Q: One of the things that Mr. Allais, the Nobel Prize economist blamed in terms of this situation, is the unlimited speculation, the banks creating money out of nothing, the financing of long-term investments with short-term funds. What can remedy these kinds of wrongdoings on the part of the banking community? MR. LAROUCHE: Nothing. That is, nothing in terms of a Mr. Fixit package; nothing in terms of some simple household recipe that somebody might think they understand in the great populist Midwest of the United States. What is happening is an unravelling of an entire system, most specifically, the system that has ruled the United States and the world under IMF leadership over the past 25 years. What is unravelling is the world that that lunatic, Milton Friedman, sold to many credulous Americans, the world which Ronald Reagan bought into, in a sense, from the propagandizing of Milton Friedman and others. So everything that the average economist from Harvard or any other leading university today is teaching as economics; that world has come to an end; and virtually every economist in the world, unlike a few people like myself and Maurice Allais and so forth, are totally unqualified to say anything about this. And the great problem is, that the people who were advising governments generally, the people who were chief executives in the banking and related financial community, are also up to their ears investing in this kind of criminal speculation. And from none of the leading conventional institutions of the press or government, is there any sanity on the question. There are leaks of sanity, out of desperation from places like the London Guardian, and a few other places, who are talking about what I've been talking about for some time: a tax on derivatives, as a way of bringing this speculation under control. That's only partial, but that's something that has to be done. What we're talking about really, are the things I proposed in my last presidential election campaign in 1992. [commercial break] Q: Mr. LaRouche, you discussed George Soros conducting operations against the French franc. How does an individual, even if he's representing a group of individuals, conduct warfare against whole countries? MR. LAROUCHE: Well, because he represents Anglo-American banking interests. Remember first of all, Soros, though he became an American citizen, was trained in London and is controlled by those financial interests in London closely tied to the British royal family, specifically the Rothschild interests. He has been controlled for some time by a fellow called Hartmann. Hartmann was operating out of Zug, Switzerland, which is one of the banking centers, through the N.M. Rothschild Continuation Trust. Hartmann was the man who controlled the BNL and BCCI simultaneously, or coordinated it, which were not Pakistani or Gulf banks; they were British Commonwealth banks, controlled through this Rothschild intermediation. He worked for them, and still does. Now on the American side, his controller or coordinator has been Gerald Corrigan, who's going to work for him on the Russian side, and a State Department official, R. Mark Palmer, who went to work for Soros even before he fully quit his job at the State Department. That's how tight this is. His operation is run largely out of the New York's Fed operation, and the major banking houses and some of the financial houses, such as Kuhn Loeb, Goldman Sachs, and so forth, that crowd, out of New York City. So it's an Anglo-American operation coordinated from London through this Zug, Switzerland-based operation. He's operating in every country in eastern Europe, including Russia, and I think Ukraine; he's operating in Italy, he's operating against the British pound, the French franc, the German mark, the Italian lira. So all of this commotion that we're seeing in European currencies, while it occurs in the context of a general collapse of international finance and monetary order, the collapse in Europe is being pushed by Soros on behalf of Anglo- American central banking and financial interests. Budget-Cutting Mania: Why the American People Must Give Up Their False Beliefs Q: Earlier on, you started to discuss the potential solutions. What would you say needs to be done to dry up the derivatives market? MR. LAROUCHE: The point is here, that the American people and the institutions, accept certain propositions. For example. Look at this insanity called budget balancing. Now what the administration is doing, in terms of budget balancing, is from an economic standpoint, absolutely insane. But don't blame the administration; look at Ross Perot, who's preaching the same doctrine. Look at the Bushies, the Bush Leaguers, who were pushing the same doctrine. They have been pushing it for years, since 1983, heavily, since the April 1993, when Volcker pushed this as a way of stopping the Strategic Defense Initiative operation, by bringing up this budget crisis, saying, ``Cut the budget, cut the budget.'' Well, this is lunacy. The actual size of federal government non-military employees today, is a smaller percentile of the labor force than it was 25 years ago. Government spending as such has not caused this crisis in any way; and cutting government spending, is not going to help the crisis in any way. But people {believe} in this budget-balancing nonsense. People in East Podunk, in Davenport, Iowa, who knows where else, believe in this nonsense. It has become the accepted myth. Whenever the budget is not balanced, whenever there's a crisis, they say balance the budget. It's a piece of insanity; but the budget balancing effort, the philosophy behind it, is what has {caused} this crisis. That is, instead of investing in creating jobs in areas which make the economy grow and thus increasing the tax revenue base without increasing tax rates, what they're doing is {cutting} the growth of the economy, making the economy smaller, increasing the ratio of tax burden to total income. It's insane. But every time it fails, they go back and say ``We didn't do it well enough, we didn't cut hard enough, we didn't take enough meat out of the bone.'' And that only makes it worse. This budget package, which the Clinton administration is pushing, hopefully through, in order to get a budget at all, is going to make things worse. Fortunately, it will not make things as bad as a {successful} budget cutting would have done. But the problem here is that the American people in particular, have been brainwashed into the thinking of Milton Friedman and similar types over these years; and when the Congressmen say, well, maybe you're right, maybe we should have a growth program, the people in East Podunk and Davenport, Iowa, are saying, cut the budget, or we'll throw you out of office. Therefore, the Congressmen, under pressure of political and intellectual corruption in the majority of voters, are doing things which many of them know to be insane; and this insanity is making things worse. Every time they try to fix it, they're using the wrong tool. It's like using a sledgehammer to fix a fine watch; and every time the watch keeps ticking, they say, ``Well, hit it harder.'' [commercial break] Q: Mr. LaRouche, please continue this discussion of the budget crisis. MR. LAROUCHE: Well, the problem here, as I said, is that the American people believe certain mythologies in which they have been thoroughly brainwashed by the official press and by idiots who teach economics in colleges. And therefore they are demanding, or being induced to demand, more of the sickness every time the sickness gets worse. It's like you have some serious sickness, and you say, ``Well, give another infusion of those infectious bacteria, see if that doesn't cure the problem.'' So the budget balancing, that is, cutting the growth factor in the U.S. economy, which is the cause of the problem, is the remedy they're applying; and that's just driving things worse. When people believe something, when there's a generally accepted false belief, then every time the society becomes sicker, the people demand a stricter application of that false belief, assuming that's the cure. Like people say, ``Give us more free market; that will cure everything.'' ``No, the market's not free enough yet, so give it more of that.'' The economy collapses and people say well, you didn't apply the free market principle strictly enough; and the economy collapses still more as a result of that. That is the kind of cycle we are in. So it's not just a technical problem, it's a problem of mentality and it's a problem of mentality which is not limited to a few economists or to some politicians in Washington. The rottenness here is imbedded in the minds of the majority of people of the United States. And since the majority of the people in the United States are demanding this kind of approach, rather than the one they need, the crisis is going to become worse until the bubble bursts. Then the people are going to scream, ``Give us something else.'' And when the people in the United States are willing to give up the silly ideas which are now the popular ideas in which they believe, then we can have a cure; but until that time, this thing is just simply going to get worse; and the people should stop blaming Washington and the technicians, and they should start blaming themselves for spending too much time watching television--spectator sports, especially--MTV, and soap opera, and reading silly newspaper articles. They should start thinking for themselves, and spending less time on these foolish types of recreations. Their lives may depend upon it; certainly their incomes do. How the Economic and Cultural Disintegration of the United States Could Come About by the Year 2000 Q: Mr. LaRouche, you refer to the Anglo-American cabal behind George Soros. Well certainly, if we look at England and the United states, they may be financial powers, but they are not superpowers any more. And when {Nezavisimaya Gazeta,} the big Moscow newspaper, talks about the U.S. disintegrating by the year 2000, are they referring to this collapse in terms of the basic infrastructure of the U.S. economy? MR. LAROUCHE: Partly. This is the July 30th edition of {Nezavisimaya Gazeta}, a featured article, which stunned a few people around the world, talking about the collapse of the United States. Well, I've been talking about that for a long time. I talked about that during the last election campaign. We are in a process, where, if certain things aren't done, which I proposed in principle during that campaign--nobody else proposed it--the United States as we know it is going to disintegrate. Look what's happening. Suppose we cut the budget some more and don't have the kind of growth program which the Congress and the majority of the people forbade Clinton even to think about. Remember, Clinton had this very token growth program we talked about a number of times; and that was crushed. It was crushed by the Congress on the demand of the New York bankers, and with the backing of the majority of people in the United States. So we have no growth; therefore, the thing is going to become worse. Then they turn around, they're going to balance the budget, as Ross Perot has demanded. That is going to make things much worse. That means the tax revenue base, through loss of business and loss of jobs around the country, is going to make things worse. It means taxes for state and local governments will collapse. It means we will not meet the demands of the nation, as for example we're not going to fix this flood effect. They're just not going to spend enough money now, to fix the effects of this current Missouri- Mississippi flood. We're going to find sections of government around the country going out of business--local governments. Davenport, Iowa, for example, may go out of business. Other communities around the nation, more and more of them, larger and larger communities, not just small ones; entire state governments will be virtually, if not entirely, shut down. Then later, within a couple of years, whole sections of the federal government, including the pension- distributing function, will be shut down. Because the money does not exist to meet these functions, these demands. We will see a process of disintegration of the structure of government combined with the worst depression in the history of the twentieth century, combined with racial and ethnic tensions which are being featured and fostered through things like the Outcome Based Education program (OBE), which is a program of turning children into zombies, dividing them against one another. [commercial break] Q: Mr. LaRouche, you were discussing the {Nezavisimaya Gazeta} article on the disintegration of the U.S. by the year 2000 and you were mentioning Outcome Based Education. MR. LAROUCHE: What is happening in our school system, if parents would look at what's coming up particularly in the fall, is that, in 40 states in the United States at last report, there are official programs to implement a revision of education, a revision which is actually designed by, literally, Satanists, that is, people who avow the worship of Satan, such as Alice Bailey some time ago, and other friends of the world's leading Satanist up to 1947, Aleister Crowley. These Satanists designed the gut of this program. The people who are leading in the program, like Robert Muller, who was formerly connected to the UNESCO organization of the United Nations, are members of a Satan-worshipping cult called the Lucifer Trust, or known more commonly recently as the Lucis Trust. This is being pushed also by a group from out at the Stanford Research Institute in California, using a book written some years ago, 1979, by a woman called Marilyn Ferguson, who worked with a guy called Willis Harmon out there at SRI. And if people look up Marilyn Ferguson, {The Aquarian Conspiracy,} and look at Chapter 9, you'll see that that Chapter 9 is being quoted all over the place by the people behind the so-called Outcome Based Education or what the Satanists call, as does the Anti-Defamation League, ``A World of Difference'' program. Now this program takes out of the schools all of the so-called cognitive elements of education, and puts in what is called affective education, the affective side of education, the emotions--in other words, brainwashing. In fact, such literal elements of brainwashing are {mandatory by state law} in many states. This brainwashing includes things such as the so-called relaxation hour, which is a deep-breathing hypnosis program, using such imaginary creatures as Pumsy the Magic Dragon; and the children are told to go off into this fantasy. Children are told to hate their parents; children are being separated from their parents by orders of social workers who are totally unqualified, so-called ``counsellors,'' who go in and say, ``Well, the child is not behaving in the approved manner, politically correct manner, therefore, the parents are not raising him or her properly,'' and take the child away from the parents. This action against children and families, done largely through the National Education Association, which has avowed itself during the 1980s, as committed to destroying the nuclear family in the United States; this program's effects upon the population under these economic conditions, is to destroy the people of the United States. And so what {Nezavisimaya Gazeta} says, is nothing different than what I've been saying for some years. The United States is headed toward disintegration, under the present program. The test is going to be this year--not just on the economic programs. Will the parents of this nation allow this educational program, this Outcome Based Education or ADL World of Difference program, this literally Satanic program, to continue in the school systems? Remember the Joseph Fernandez case in New York City, where they were teaching homosexuality to children at the age of six. You have these pro-child-molesting organizations which publish these books which are going into the school system as reading material for six-year-olds. And they were made mandatory by Joseph Fernandez, who was the Commissioner of Education up there in New York, until some parents revolted and he had to get out. But that's going on all over the country: literal child molesting. Sexually tainted child molesting, intellectual child molesting, is going on. If that happens, we don't have any population, we don't have families; we don't have anything. And this nation is headed toward disintegration. The American people are facing a moral test. Because I think the one place the American people are most likely to show morality, is toward the care and protection of their younger children. I think they've given up on their adolescents; but their younger children. And if the American people do not defend their younger children, by stopping these child-molesting programs called Outcome Based Education or CORE program or World of Difference program, these Satanic programs, then this nation has morally judged itself as unfit to survive; and all the ingredients are there, for disintegration of this nation. Disintegration: just coming apart before the end of this century. Q: Mr. LaRouche, I would like to move to Bosnia for a second. Talking about disintegration, this area of the world is facing obliteration and the latest Owen Plan, called for a partition, and the President of Bosnia, Izetbegovic, rejected it, on the basis that it did not recognize the sovereignty of Bosnia. What is the significance of that rejection? MR. LAROUCHE: Well, the rejection is twofold. First of all, Owen and his crowd are closely associated with those Serbian fascists who are doing the atrocities in former Yugoslavia. So don't be surprised that Owen continues the policy of Henry Kissinger's buddy, Lord Carrington, in doing everything possible to help the Serbs butcher and take over everything. Owen is just simply a degenerate; there's no other way to put it. The man is a psychiatrist, he's linked to these psychiatrists, who, like Karadzic, are directing the atrocities. So don't be surprised at anything. Izetbegovic saw this. His legal adviser, a professor of international law, Prof. Boyle, noted that once he signed that thing, he'd lose everything. There was a blow-up in the meeting. The adviser who actually wrote this garbage, blew up and stalked out of the room when his role and his policy were exposed. But there's another aspect to this point. The reason that the United States is collapsing politically, and the reason that the world is collapsing politically, is because the United States backed down to British and French pressure and did not intervene militarily in the Balkans to aid the Bosnians against these Serbian fascists in April and May, as had been planned. Recently, as we know, a group of members of the House of Representatives and the Senate, moved with a letter to the President, giving him support for acting on this. So the United States put more pressure on the Europeans to give permission for the United States to use planes, air support, to help the Bosnians against the Serbian artillery positions and presumably to lift these sanctions against the Bosnians, so they could have some guns to defend themselves. This is still being debated; and this debate this weekend, comes in the context of these two things. Izetbegovic said he will not betray his nation; Owen is exposed as the thug he is, that is, he's one of the criminals, not one of the mediators, properly; and that's the way she goes. So at stake, if Clinton does not succeed in getting the United States to take military action in time, air power action primarily, to stop the Serbs before the atrocity is fait accompli, then the credibility of the United States government and specifically of the Clinton administration, goes down the drain. [commercial break] The Clinton Administration's Credibility Rests on Bosnia Q: Mr. LaRouche, what hope does Izetbegovic have for saving Bosnia and for defending the idea of sovereignty, which is under such major attack? MR. LAROUCHE: We're at one minute to midnight or past it right now. The issue is not just Bosnia; the issue is the United States. If President Clinton is not able to act militarily before Sarajevo falls or virtually falls, then the United States will have lost irreparably, under Clinton's administration, its credibility as a power. Slamming Iraq, slamming Somalia, that sort of thing, does not do anything in effect. These Bush tactics do nothing to deflect from the fact, that Bosnia is the issue over which the Clinton administration stands or falls. If the Clinton administration does not bull through military action to save the Bosnians from the Serbian fascists in time to save Sarajevo, in particular, then the Clinton administration goes down in flames; I don't think much of anything could be done to save it. That's where the issue lies. And if the Clinton administration loses credibility in that way, then all of the world's system, all of the governments of Western Europe, Japan-- the whole kit and caboodle--they all lose credibility. And we go on to a slide in the direction of chaos, globally. That's what this really means. Why the Utopians Are Unleashing Chaos Throughout the World Q: Mr. LaRouche, Italian anti-mafia prosecutor Bruno Siclari, in discussing the recent Rome and Milan bombings, referred to the involvement of organized crime, and he also mentioned plans to destabilize all of Europe. You were just mentioning chaos spreading throughout the world. What is behind these kind of destabilizations? MR. LAROUCHE: Well, there was a meeting which {EIR} was among the first to cover, an article to which the major Italian press and authorities have referred repeatedly. There was a meeting on the British royal yacht Britannica, off the coast of Italy. In that meeting, the plan was launched for the internal destruction of Italy. All of the things that are happening in Italy, in the form of what's called a NATO strategy-of-tension tactic as we experienced in the 1970s, is coming from that quarter in Britain, the same quarter which is behind George Soros. All of these elements in Italy, which are moving toward the disintegration of Italy, which are using terrorism in Italy, are of that same species. The center of that, is the old Mazzinian Freemasonry, though the Freemasons in Italy are split between those who are with the British, and those who are against them. Some of the Freemasons in italy, are, as they have said openly, against this British plot; others are for it. And it appears that some of the American intelligence networks, are tied up with the British in pushing it. So there is U.S. as well as British complicity, as well as complicity, say, from certain circles in France and so forth, in this terrorism and destabilization in Italy. We're back to the Moro assassination pattern, 1978, in which a former prime minister of Italy, Aldo Moro, under personal threat from Henry Kissinger, was kidnapped and assassinated by his kidnappers in an effort to destabilize Italy in 1978. And this was a process which went on from 1975, 1976, which Giulio Andreotti, the recent prime minister and often prime minister of Italy can talk about, because he came under direct pressure from Kissinger, from the Americans, to attack Moro, back in the 1975-1976 period--a great mistake on Giulio Andreotti's part. But it's similar. Kissinger's friends, or Kissinger's owners in London, and his friends in the United States, are involved as the principal force from the outside, directing the destabilization of Italy--and the terrorism that goes with it. Q: What do they hope to accomplish? MR. LAROUCHE: Destroy Italy. Destroy Europe. The idea is, that since the British and American economies are collapsing, and despite all the silly talk in the newspapers, every person in the higher circles inside the United States, knows that the U.S. economy is collapsing. They may not say it in the press, they may deny it when confronted with the fact; but they know it. They know also that the only way the United States and Britain can preserve their political power in the world, is to collapse the economies of their friends, as well as the economies of the former Soviet empire. And China; and that they are doing. They are collapsing the economy of China. That's what the Chinese are attacking this Governor of Hongkong about. They are collapsing the governments and the peoples of Russia, eastern Europe. Eastern European economies are down to 30 percent of what they were in 1989, as a result of this destabilization. They are collapsing the German economy. They are collapsing the French economy, the Italian, the Spanish, the Netherlands economy, the so-called Scandinavian economies. All of these economies are being collapsed, by the people who own Kissinger, as a way of trying to keep Anglo-American control over the world. It's pure destruction. It's just like the people who are putting this deconstruction program, this OBE program, this World of Difference program through the schools, know they're brainwashing the American children, know they're destroying the family; they are destroying the United States--they know they're doing that. They're doing it, because that's their purpose. They think that somehow works out to cause chaos and bring upon the world their kind of utopia reborn out of chaos. You have two policies in the world today, from these circles. One circle, which is shrinking in power, is the circle associated with George Bush's idea of a new world order. Well, the new world order doesn't work; it's gone, it's finished. And all the killing of the innocent people in Panama and Iraq and so forth; that didn't work. It's finished. Instead, these people are saying, well, let's go to chaos; let's have worldwide chaos; and we'll come out on top with some kind of utopian scheme to rebuild the world, after we go through a period of chaos, and that's what you're seeing, is the delivery of chaos. ``Demjanjuk Walks Free or the U.S. Department of Justice Has No Credibility'' Q: I'd like to switch now to a discussion of John Demjanjuk. It seemed that the saga of this retired auto worker who was accused of being Ivan the Terrible had come to an end with the Supreme Court of Israel saying that he was not Ivan the Terrible and releasing him, and the Sixth Circuit of the United States saying he could come home. But now, the Israeli Supreme Court--another division of it--says they may try him again. MR. LAROUCHE: Well, they're going to have the same problem. You know, of course, the Sixth Circuit, as you said, has lifted the restrictions on granting him a visa, to come back to the United States. There are people in Israel on the Yahoo or ADL side, who are desperate not to have him come back to the United States. So they put pressure on Israel to keep him there. That is, the Anti- Defamation League and that crowd around Neal Sher at the Office of Special Investigations. But it happens, as {Der Spiegel,} the German newsweekly has reported this past week, that examination of this additional evidence, shows that the new charges against him, are as fraudulent--that is, based on forged documents and obviously forged documents--as the original charges. Remember: Demjanjuk was kicked out of the United States and put under a death sentence in Israel, on totally fake evidence, manufactured with the late Armand Hammer's complicity, with the complicity of the Department of Justice, and with the Soviet KGB, which faked this evidence for Armand Hammer and for the U.S. prosecutors. He has now been exonerated of these charges. The whole case against him was fraudulent, a knowing fraud upon the court from the beginning. Now they say, well, let's have a new case against him. And the evidence in the new case, is as fraudulent as the evidence in the old case. They're forgeries, very crude and obvious forgeries, done to try to keep this from blowing up in the face of the Anti-Defamation League and similar people in the Department of Justice. So we have a Department of Justice nest which is tied to the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. That nest is the most corrupt part of the U.S. government. The problem that Miss Janet Reno faces now, is can she, will she, clean out that nest of corruption from the Justice Department, which is centered in B'nai B'rith and the Office of Special Investigations currently around Neal Sher? Demjanjuk walks free in the United States or else the Department of Justice has no credibility. Q: Mr. LaRouche, you mentioned earlier the B'nai B'rith and the ADL. Of course, there's the ADL case in San Francisco, where a number of people are accused of spying and selling information to foreign governments; and now it appears that Kenneth Bialkin has gone to bat for the ADL, and is calling for a plea bargain. Well, how does an institution like the ADL have so much power? MR. LAROUCHE: Well, they don't have their own power. B'nai B'rith was created in the 1840s. It was created not by Jews. Remember, Judaism is a religion. It is not a race, it is not a nationality, even though Israel was founded in 1947. But Judaism is a religion, or the religious culture which is shared by people who are no longer practicing Jews. But it's a religion of many nationalities. It is not a race, it is not a nationality--unless you're an Israeli. These people were essentially members of a Satanic cult, a racist, pro-Satanic pro-slavery organization, who were created as a branch of British intelligence in the 1840s under the direction of Lord Palmerston from Britain. B'nai B'rith was created in New York and Charleston, South Carolina. B'nai B'rith was a spy agency during this period prior to and during the Civil War, for the Confederacy. B'nai B'rith was among the founders of the Ku Klux Klan, back in 1865. B'nai B'rith was a co-founder of the rebirth of the Ku Klux Klan in 1915, together with Woodrow Wilson, who endorsed and backed this rebuilding of the Ku Klux Klan in 1915 as a pro- British, pro-war operation. All of Hollywood--Metro-Goldwyn Meyer, Paramount, Warner Brothers--was created around this Ku Klux Klan recruiting drive using the ``Birth of a Nation'' film and other films as the means for doing it. So that's what B'nai B'rith is. It is filth. It is not a Jewish organization. It is a faction of people, who were admittedly Jews, but who are pro-slavery, pro-racist, and pro-Satanic; and that's not a good recommendation for being a Jew. MEL KLENETSKY: Mr. LaRouche, thank you very much. We're coming to the end of our program. This is ``{EIR'}s Talks With LaRouche.'' We'll see you next week. If people want to write in to ask questions, present questions to ``{EIR'}s Talks,'' or to found out information about how to order {EIR,} write ``{EIR} Talks With LaRouche, c/o EIR News Service, Inc., Attn: Mel Klenetsky, P.O. Box 17390, Washington, D.C., 20041-0390. - 30 - ---- John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.