Fifth Day:
Monday, 26rd November, 1945
[Page 172]
Since Albania, there is an equilibrium of power in the
Balkans. Yugoslavia carries the germ of collapse because
of her internal situation.
Roumania did not grow stronger. She is liable to attack
and vulnerable. She is threatened by Hungary and
Bulgaria. Since Kemal's death, Turkey has been ruled by
small minds, unsteady weak men.
[Page 173]
No one knows how long I shall live. Therefore conflict
is better now.
The creation of Greater Germany was a great achievement
politically, but militarily it was questionable, since
it was achieved through a bluff of the political
leaders. It is necessary to test the military, if at
all possible, not by general settlement, but by solving
individual tasks.
Relations with Poland have become unbearable. My Polish
policy hitherto has been contrary to the ideas of the
people. My propositions to Poland, the Danzig corridor,
were disturbed by England's intervention. Poland changed
her tune towards us. The initiative cannot be allowed to
pass to the others. The time is more favourable today
than it will be in two to three years. An attempt on my
life or Mussolini's would change the situation to our
disadvantage. One cannot eternally stand opposite
another with rifle cocked. A suggested compromise would
have demanded that we change our convictions and make
agreeable gestures. They talked to us again in the
language of Versailles. There was danger of losing
prestige. Now the probability is still great that the
West will not interfere. We must accept the risk with
reckless resolution. A politician must accept a risk as
much as a military leader. We are facing the alternative
to strike or to be destroyed with certainty sooner or
later."
Destruction of Poland in the foreground. The aim is the
elimination of living forces, not the arrival at a
certain line. Even if war should break out in the West,
the destruction of Poland shall be the primary
objective. Quick decision because of the season.
I shall give a propagandistic cause for starting the
war, never mind whether it be plausible or not. The
victor shall not be asked, later on, whether we told
the truth or not. In starting and making a war, not the
Right is what matters, but Victory.
Have no pity. Brutal attitude. Eighty million people
shall get what is their right. Their existence has to
be secured. The strongest has the right. Greatest
severity.
[Page 174]
First aim: advance to the Vistula and Narew. Our
technical superiority will break the nerves of the
Poles. Every newly created Polish force shall again be
broken at once. Constant war of attrition.
New German frontier according to healthy principle.
Possibly a protectorate as a buffer. Military
operations shall not be influenced by these
reflections. Complete destruction of Poland is the
military aim. To be fast is the main thing. Pursuit
until complete elimination.
Conviction that the German Wehrmacht is up to the
requirements. The start shall be ordered, probably by
Saturday morning."
DR. STAHMER (Counsel for defendant Goering): I should like
to make a statement or explanation of the last two documents
read. Both these, as well as the third that was not read,
but which was taken into consideration, are not recognised
by the defence. In order to avoid the appearance that this
objection has been raised without due reason, I should like
to justify it as follows:
Both the documents that were read contain a number of
factual mistakes. They are not signed. Moreover, only one
meeting took place, and that is where the documents lack
precision. No one it, that meeting was commissioned with
taking down stenographically the events in the meeting, and
since all signatures are lacking, it cannot be determined
who wrote them or who is responsible for their reliability.
The third document that was not read is, according to the
photostatic copy in the defence's document room, simply
written by typewriter. There is no indication of place nor
of time.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we have got nothing to do with the
third document, because it has not been read.
DR. STAHMER: Mr. President, this document has nevertheless
been published in the Press and was apparently given to the
Press by the prosecution. Both the defence and the
defendants have consequently a lively interest in giving a
short explanation of the facts concerning this document.
THE PRESIDENT: The Tribunal is trying this case in
accordance with the evidence and not in accordance with what
is in the Press, and the third document is not in evidence
before us.
MR. ALDERMAN: May it please the Tribunal, I recognise that
counsel wonder how these two documents which I have just
read are in our hands. They come to us from an authentic
source. They are German documents. They were found in the
O.K.W. files. If they are not correct records of what
occurred, it surprises us that with the thoroughness with
which the Germans kept accurate records, they would have had
these records in their O.K.W. files if they did not
represent the truth.
THE PRESIDENT: Mr. Alderman, the Tribunal will of course
hear what evidence the defendants choose to give with
reference to the documents.
MR. ALDERMAN: It has occurred to me in that connection that
if any of these defendants have in their possession what is
a more correct transcription of the Fuehrer's words on this
occasion, the Court should consider that. On the other
question referred to by counsel, I feel somewhat guilty. It
is quite true that by a mechanical slip, the Press got the
first document, which we never at all intended them to have.
I feel somewhat responsible. It happened to be included in
the document books that were handed up to the Court on
Friday, because we had only intended. to refer to it and
give it an identification mark and not to offer it. I had
thought that no documents would be released to the Press
until they were actually offered in evidence. With as large
an organisation as we have, it is very difficult to police
all those matters.
[Page 175]
MR. ALDERMAN: I can't answer that.
COLONEL STOREY: May it please the Tribunal, it is my
understanding that as and when documents are introduced in
evidence, then they are made available to the Press.
THE PRESIDENT: In what numbers?
COLONEL STOREY: I think about 250 copies of each one, about
200 or 250 mimeographed copies.
THE PRESIDENT: The Tribunal thinks that the defendants'
Counsel should have copies of these documents before any of
them are handed to the Press. I mean to say that, in
preference to gentlemen of the Press, the defendants'
Counsel should have the documents.
COLONEL STOREY: Your Honour, if it pleases the Court, I
understand that these gentleman had the ten documents on
Saturday morning or Sunday morning. They had them for 24
hours, copies of the originals of these documents that have
been read today, down in the Information Centre.
THE PRESIDENT: I stated, in accordance with the provisional
arrangement which was made, and which was made upon your
representations, that ten copies of the trial briefs and
five of the volumes of documents should be given to the
defendants' counsel.
COLONEL STOREY: Sir, I had the receipts that they were
deposited in the room.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, but what I am pointing out to you,
Colonel Storey, is that if 2SO copies of the documents can
be given to the Press, then the defendants' counsel should
not be limited to five copies.
COLONEL STOREY: If your Honour pleases, the 250 copies are
the mimeographed copies in English when they are introduced
in evidence. I hold in my hands or in my brief case here a
receipt that the document books and the briefs were
delivered 24 hours in advance.
THE PRESIDENT: You don't seem to understand what I am
putting to you, which is this: that if you can afford to
give 250 copies of the documents in English to the Press,
you can afford to give more than five copies to the
defendants' counsel - one each.
COLONEL STOREY: I see your point, your Honour, and we-
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we needn't discuss it further. In
future that will be done.
DR. DIX: May I make the point that of the evidence
documents, every defence counsel should receive one copy and
not simply one for several members of the defence.
THE PRESIDENT: Go on, Mr. Alderman.
MR. ALDERMAN: The aggressive war having been initiated in
September 1939, and Poland having been totally defeated
shortly after the initial assaults, the Nazi aggressors
converted the war into a general war of aggression extending
into Scandinavia, into the Low Countries, and into the
Balkans. Under the division of the case between the four
Chief Prosecutors, this aspect of the matter is left to
presentation by the British Chief Prosecutor.
Another change that we have made in our plan, which I
perhaps should mention, is that following the opening
statement by the British Chief Prosecutor on Count 2, we
expect to resume the detailed handling of the later phases
of the aggressive war phase of the case. The British instead
of the Americans will deal with the details of aggression
against Poland. Then with this expansion of the war in
Europe and then as a joint part of the American case under
Count 1 and the British case under Count 2, I shall take up
the aggression against Russia and the Japanese aggression in
detail. So that the remaining two subjects with which I
shall ultimately deal in more detail, by presentation of
specifically significant documents, are the case of the
attack on the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the
22nd of June, 1941, and the case on collaboration between
Italy and Japan
[Page 176]
As to the case on aggression against the Soviet Union, I
shall, at this point, present two documents. The first of
these two documents establishes the pre-meditation and
deliberation which preceded the attack. Just as, in the case
of aggression against Czechoslovakia, the Nazis had a code
name for the secret operation "Case Green," so in the case
of aggression against the Soviet Union, they had a code name
"Case Barbarossa."
THE PRESIDENT: How do you spell that?
MR. ALDERMAN B-a-r-b-a-r-o-s-s-a -after Barbarossa of
Kaiser Friederich. From the files of the O.K.W. at Flensburg
we have a secret directive, Number 21, issued from the
Fuehrer's headquarters on 18th December, 1940, relating to "Case Barbarossa." This directive is more than six months in
advance of the attack. Other evidence will show that the
planning occurred even earlier. The document is signed by
Hitler and is initialled by the defendant Jodl and the
defendant Keitel. This secret order was issued in nine
copies. The captured document is the fourth of these nine
copies. It is document 446 PS, in our numbered series.
I offer it in evidence as exhibit USA 31.
If the Tribunal please, I think it will be sufficient for me
to read the first page of that directive; the first page of
the English translation. The paging may differ on the German
original.
It is headed "The Fuehrer and Commander-in-Chief of the
German Armed Forces" with a number of initials, the meaning
of which I don't know, except O.K.W. It seems to be
indicated to go to O.K. Chiefs, whom I suppose to be General
Kommando Chiefs.
The German Armed Forces must be prepared to crush Soviet
Russia in a quick campaign before the end of the war
against England. (Case Barbarossa).
For this purpose the Army will have to employ all
available units with the reservation that the occupied
territories will have to be safeguarded against surprise
attacks.
For the Eastern campaign the Air Force will have to free
such Strong forces for the support of the Army that a
quick completion of the ground operations may he expected
and that damage of the Eastern German territories will be
avoided as much as possible. This concentration of the
main effort in the East is limited by the following
reservation: That the entire battle and armament area
dominated by us must remain sufficiently protected
against enemy air attacks and that the attacks on England
and especially the supply for them must not be permitted
to break down.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
(Part 6 of 7)
[MR ALDERMAN continues]
Further favourable factors for us are these:
We skip a paragraph, two paragraphs.
"Now it is also a great risk. Iron nerves, iron resolution."
A long discussion follows which I think it is unnecessary to
read, and then towards the end, four paragraphs from the
bottom, I resume: "We need not be afraid of a blockade. The
East will supply us with grain, cattle, coal, lead and zinc.
It is a big aim which demands great efforts. I am only
afraid that at the last minute some 'Schweinehund' will make
a proposal for mediation." And then the last paragraph of
one sentence: "Goering answers with thanks to the Fuehrer
and the assurance that the Armed Forces will do their duty."
I believe I have already offered exhibit USA 30, which is a
shorter note entitled, "Second Speech of the Fuehrer on 22nd
August, 1939." Reading, then, from that exhibit headed
"Second Speech of the Fuehrer on 22nd August, 1939:
"It may also turn out differently regarding England and
France. One cannot predict it with certainty. I figure
on a trade barrier, not on blockade, and with severance
of relations. Most iron determination on our side.
Retreat before nothing. Everybody will have to make a
point of it that we were determined from the beginning
to fight the Western Powers. A struggle for life or
death. Germany has won every war as long as she was
united. Iron, unflinching attitude of all superiors,
greatest confidence, faith in victory, overcoming of
the past by getting used to the heaviest strain. A long
period of peace would not do us any good. Therefore it
is necessary to expect everything. Manly bearing. It is
not machines that fight each other, but men. We have
the better quality of men. Mental factors are decisive.
The opposite camp has weaker people. In 1918 the nation
fell down because the mental pre-requisites were not
sufficient. Frederic the Great secured final success
only through his mental power.
That ends the quotation. The Tribunal will recall that in
fact the start was actually postponed until 1st September.
"The Fuehrer's Headquarters, 18th December, 1940.
Secret. Only through Officer. Nine Copies. 4th copy.
Directive Number 21, case Barbarossa.