Sixteenth Day:
Monday, 10th December, 1945
[Page 256]
That brings us to the consideration of the motives for the attack.
Before going into the positive reasons, I should like first to
point out that not only was Germany bound by a solemn covenant not
to attack the U.S.S.R., but that throughout the entire period from
August, 1939, to the invasion in 1941, the Soviet Union was
faithful to its agreements with Germany and displayed no
aggressive intentions toward territories of the German Reich.
General Thomas, for example, points out in his draft of "Basic
Facts for a History of the German War and Armaments Economy,"
which is our Document 23S3-PS and which I put in evidence earlier
as Exhibit USA 3S, that in so far as the German-Soviet trade
agreement of 11th August, 1939, was concerned, the Soviets carried
out their deliveries thereunder up to the very end.
Thomas points out that deliveries by the Soviets were usually made
quickly and well, and since the food and raw materials being thus
delivered were considered essential to the German economy, efforts
were made to keep up their side too. However, as preparations for
the campaign proceeded, the Nazis cared less about complying with
their obligations under that agreement. At Page 315 of his book,
Thomas says, and I read from Page 9 of the English translation:
"The Russians carried out their deliveries as planned, right up
to the start of the attack; even during the last few days,
transports of india-rubber from the Far East were completed by
Express transit trains."
MR. ALDERMAN: Yes.
THE PRESIDENT: Where is that?
MR. ALDERMAN : It is Page 14 of the English translation of these
notes.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.
[Page 257] [Page 258]
As early as 1923, Hitler outlined this theory in some detail in
Mein Kampf, where he stated - and I quote from Page 641 of the
Houghton Mifflin English edition - as follows:-
1. Here perhaps we are dealing with the most decisive concern of
all German foreign affairs; and
2. This question is also the touchstone for the political
capacity of the young National Socialist movement to think
clearly and to act correctly."
If we speak of soil in Europe today, we can primarily have in
mind only Russia and her vassal border States." [Page 259]
The economic motive for the aggression was brought out clearly in
our discussion of the organisation set up under Goering and
General Thomas, to carry out the economic exploitation of the
territories they occupied. The purely materialistic basis for the
attack was unmistakable, and if any doubt existed that at least
one of the main purposes of the invasion was to steal the food and
raw material needed for the Nazi war machine regardless of the
horrible consequences such robbery would entail, that doubt is
dispelled by Document 2718-PS which I introduced earlier during my
opening
statement as Exhibit USA 32, showing clear and conscious
recognition that these Nazi plans would no doubt result in
starving to death millions of people by robbing them of
their food.
Along the similar line, on 20th June, 1941, General Thomas wrote a
memorandum in which he stated that General Keitel had confirmed to
him Hitler's present conception of the German economic policy
concerning raw material. This policy expressed the almost
unbelievably heartless theory that less manpower would be used in
the conquest of sources of raw materials than would be necessary
to produce synthetics in lieu of such raw materials. This is our
Document 1456-PS, and I offer it in evidence as Exhibit USA 1481
should like to read the first two paragraphs.
THE PRESIDENT: Perhaps we better do that after the adjournment.
(A recess was taken until 1400 hours.)
THE PRESIDENT: I understand that the defendant Kaltenbrunner is
now in Court. Will you stand up, please. (Whereupon the defendant
Kaltenbrunner stands up in the defendants' box.)
THE PRESIDENT: In accordance with Article 24 of the Charter, you
must now plead either guilty or not guilty.
THE DEFENDANT KALTENBRUNNER: I do not believe that I have made
myself guilty.
MR. ALDERMAN: May it please this Tribunal. I have just put into
evidence Document 1456-PS as Exhibit USA 148. I now read from this
document on Page 1:-
[Page 260]
I now turn to the final phase of the detailed presentation of the
aggressive war case, German collaboration with Italy and Japan,
and aggressive war against the United States. The relevant
portions of the Indictment are set forth in Subsection 7 under
Section IV (F) of Count 1, appearing at Pages 9 and 10 of the
printed English text of the Indictment. The materials relating to
this unholy alliance of the three Fascist powers, and to the
aggressive war against the United States, have been gathered
together in a document book, marked with the letter "Q", which I
now submit to the Tribunal.
Before moving to the subject matter of this tripartite
collaboration, I should like to invite the attention of the
Tribunal to the significance of this phase. In the course of the
joint presentation by the British and American prosecution in the
past several days, we have seen the swastika carried forward by
force of arms from a tightly controlled and remilitarised Germany
to the four corners of Europe. The elements of a conspiracy which
I am now about. to discuss, project the Nazi plan upon a universal
screen, involving the "Older World" of Asia, and the "New World"
of the United States of America. As a result, the wars of
aggression that were planned in Berlin, and launched across the
frontiers of Poland, ended some six years later, almost to the
day, in surrender observed upon a United States battleship, riding
at anchor in the Bay of Tokyo.
[Page 261]
I ask the Tribunal to take judicial notice of these official State
documents, in accordance with Article 21 of the Charter. The
German text of these treaties - the original German-Japanese Anti-
Comintern Pact, and the subsequent Protocol of Adherence by Italy
- are to be found in Volumes 4 and 5 of the "Dokumente der
Deutschen Politik ", respectively. The English translation of the
German-Japanese Anti-Comintern Pact of 25th November, 1936, is
contained in our Document 2508-PS; the English translation of the
Protocol of Adherence by Italy of 6th November, 1937, is contained
in our Document 2506-PS. Both of these documents are included in
the document books which have just been handed up to the Tribunal.
It is an interesting fact, especially in light of the evidence I
shall submit regarding the defendant Ribbentrop's active
participation in collaboration with the Japanese, that it was he
who signed the Anti-Comintern Pact for Germany, at Berlin, even
though at that time, November, 1936, he was not the German Foreign
Minister, but simply Hitler's Special Ambassador Plenipotentiary.
On 27th September, 1940, some four years after the Anti-Comintern
Pact was signed, and one year after the initiation of war in
Europe, the German, Italian and Japanese Governments signed
another pact at Berlin, a ten-year military-economic alliance.
Again I note that the defendant Ribbentrop signed for Germany,
this time in his capacity as Foreign. Minister. The official
German text of this pact, as well as the Japanese and Italian
texts, together with an English translation, is contained in our
Document 2643-PS, which has been certified by the signature and
seal of the United States Secretary of State. I now offer in
evidence Document 2643-PS as Exhibit USA 149.
[
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
(Part 5 of 9)
[MR. ALDERMAN continues]
"I have therefore today decided to give the fate of Europe again
into the hands of our soldiers."
This announcement told the world that the die had been cast-the
plans darkly conceived almost a full year before, and secretly and
continuously developed since then, had now been brought to
fruition. These conspirators, having carefully and completely
prepared this war of aggression, now proceeded to initiate and
wage it.
"Later on the urgency of the Russian deliveries diminished, as
preparations for the campaign in the East were already under
way." - By that, clearly he speaks of German deliveries to
Russia, not as to what the Russians delivered.
Again at Page 404, this author brings this point out even more
forcefully when he states, and I shall read the first paragraph on
Page 14 of the English translation:
"In addition to the Italian negotiations, until June, 1941, the
negotiations with Russia were accorded a great deal of attention.
The Fuehrer issued the directive that, in order to camouflage-"
THE PRESIDENT: Are you reading now from a document?
"The Fuehrer issued the directive that, in order to camouflage
German troop movements, the orders Russia has placed in Germany
must be
Not only was the Soviet Union faithful to the treaty obligations
with Germany, but the evidence shows that she had no aggressive
intentions toward any German territory. Our Document C-170, which
is in evidence as Exhibit USA 136, is, as I have previously
stated, a file on Russo-German relations found in the files of the
Naval High Command covering the entire period from the treaty to
the attack. The entries in this file demonstrate conclusively the
point I have just stated. It will, I think, be sufficient to read
to the Tribunal a few entries which include reports from the
German Ambassador in Moscow as late as June, 1941. 1 shall read
the first entry "165" on Page 21 of the English translation. That
is 4th June.
"Outwardly, no change in the relationship Germany-Russia;
Russian deliveries continue to full satisfaction. Russian
government is endeavouring to do everything to prevent a
conflict with Germany."
In entry 167, on Page 22 of the English translation, it says:
"6th June. Ambassador in Moscow reports: Russia will only fight
if attacked by Germany. Situation is considered in Moscow much
more serious than before. All military preparations have been
made quietly - as far as can be recognised, only defensive.
Russian policy still strives as before to maintain the best
possible relationship to Germany."
The next one is entry 169, also on Page 22, the date, 7th June.
"From the report of the Ambassador in Moscow: All observations
show that Stalin and Molotov, who alone are responsible for
Russian foreign policy, are doing everything to avoid a
conflict with Germany. The entire behaviour of the Government,
as well as the attitude of the Press, which reports all events
concerning Germany in a factual, indisputable manner, supports
this view. The loyal fulfilment of the economic treaty with
Germany proves the same thing". - Now, that is the German
Ambassador talking to you.
The reasons, therefore, which led to the attack on the Soviet
Union could not have been self-defence or treaty breaches. In
truth, no doubt, as has been necessarily implied from the
materials presented on planning and preparation, more than one
motive entered into the decision of the Nazi conspirators to
launch their aggression against the U.S.S.R. All of them, however,
appear to blend into one grand motive of Nazi policy. The pattern
into which these various reasons impelling the decision to attack
may be said to fall, is the traditional Nazi ambition for
expansion to the East at the
"There are two reasons which induce me to submit to a special
examination the relation of Germany to Russia:
And again at Page 654 of the same edition:-
"And so we National Socialists consciously draw a line beneath
the foreign policy tendency of our pre-war period. We take up
where we broke off 600 years ago. We stop the endless German
movement to the South and West, and turn our gaze toward the
land in the East. At long last we break off the colonial and
commercial policy of the pre-war period and shift to the soil
policy of the future.
The political portion of this economy or purpose is clearly
reflected in the stated purposes of the organisation which the
defendant Rosenberg set up to administer the occupied Eastern
territories. I have already discussed this material and need not
repeat it now. In a speech, however, which he delivered, two days
before the attack, to the people most interested in the problem of
the East, Rosenberg re-stated, in his usual somewhat mystic
fashion, the political basis for the campaign and its inter-
relationship with the economic goal. I should like to read a short
extract from that speech, which is Document 1058-PS, and which I
now offer in evidence as Exhibit USA 147. The part I read is from
Page 9 of the German text:-
"The job of feeding the German people stands, this year,
without a doubt, at the top of the list of Germany's claims on
the East; and here the Southern territories and the Northern
Caucasus will have to serve as a balance for the feeding of the
German people. We see absolutely no reason for any obligation
on our part to feed also the Russian people with the products
of that surplus territory. We know of course that this is a
harsh necessity, bare of any feelings. A very extensive
evacuation
As I have indicated, the failure of the Nazi conspirators to
defeat Great Britain had served to further strengthen them in
their belief in the political necessity of eliminating the Soviet
Union as a European factor, before Germany could completely
achieve her role as the master of Europe.
"The following is a new conception of the Fuehrer, which
Minister Todt has explained to me and which has been confirmed
later on by Field Marshal Keitel: Paragraph 1. The course of
the war shows that we went too far in our autarkical
endeavours. It is impossible to try and manufacture everything
we lack by synthetic procedures, or
On this macabre note I come to the end of the story of this
aggression. We have seen the Nazi conspirators as they planned,
prepared, and finally initiated their wanton attack upon the
Soviet Union. Others will carry on the tale and describe the
horrible manner in which they waged this war of aggression, and
the countless crimes they committed in its wake. When I consider
the solemn pledge of non-aggression, the base and sinister motives
involved, the months of secret planning and preparation, and the
unbelievable suffering intentionally and deliberately wrought -
when I consider all of this, I feel fully justified in saying that
never before - and, God helping us, never again - in the history
of relations between sovereign nations, has a blacker chapter been
written than the one which tells of the Nazi conspirators'
unprovoked invasion of the territory of the Soviet Union. For
those responsible - and they are here before you, the defendants
in this case - it might be just to let the punishment fit the
crime.