Thirty-Seventh Day:
Friday, January 18th, 1946
[Page 409] [Page 410]
M. HERZOG: These rules of International Law determine
positively the legal powers of the nation having prisoners
of war in its custody. It is legal to force prisoners of war
to work during the duration of their captivity, but this
includes three legal limits:
(2) War prisoners must not be used for work which is
dangerous.
(3) Prisoners must not be associated with the enemy war
effort.
THE PRESIDENT: We will take a recess for 10 minutes.
(A recess was taken.)
M. HERZOG: Mr. President, your Honours.
Dating from 1941, the Germans exercised direct pressure on
non-commissioned
officers to force them to engage in productive work for the
Reich war economy. This pressure, after the failure of
propaganda methods, took the form of reprisals. Non-
commissioned officers who refused were the object of ill-
treatment; they were sent to special camps, such as
Coberczyn where they were subject to a disciplinary regime.
Some incurred penal sentences because of their refusal to
work. I file, as proof, the report of the Ministry of
Prisoners, Deportees, and Refugees of the French Government,
Document UK-78-2, which is, in my document book, RF 46. The
document is in a white file. I shall read from Page 18 of
the French original, Page 10 of the German translation, Page
18, at the bottom of the page:
On this subject the Geneva Convention was explicit: non-
commissioned officers who are war prisoners cannot be
subjected to work as supervisors, unless they make an
express request for a remunerative occupation.
In conformity with this article a certain number of non-
commissioned officers refused to work from the beginning of
their captivity. The strength of imprisoned non-commissioned
officers was, at the end of 1940, about 130,000, and
represented later a very important source of labour for the
Reich. The German authorities tried, therefore, by every
means, to induce to work the greatest possible number of
those refusing. To this effect, during the last months of
1941, the non-commissioned officers who did not volunteer
for the work were, in most camps, subjected to an
alternating regime. For a few days they were subjected to
punishments such as the diminution of food rations, doing
without beds, the obligation to undergo physical exercises
for a number of hours, and particularly the 'pelote'
(punishment drill). During another period they were promised
work, in conformity with their wishes, and other material
advantages, for example, special regulations of insurance,
extra letter provisions and higher wages. These methods led
a certain number of non-commissioned officers to accept
work. The non-commissioned officers who persisted in their
refusal to work, were subjected to a very severe
disciplinary regime and to arduous physical exercises." [Page 411]
I now quote Page 27 of the French document, Page 14 of the
German translation. It is the same document from which I
have just quoted, Exhibit RF 46, Page 27:
The war prisoners, Command 274 of Stalag 2-B,
complained, December, 1944, of being employed on Sundays
in the construction of anti-tank trenches.
On 2nd February, 1945, the prisoners of Stalag 2-B,
evacuated before the advance of the Russian Army,
worked, as soon as they arrived at Sassnity, at
fortification works and anti-tank works, in particular
around the city.
After falling back from Stalag 3-B, the war prisoners
were engaged, to the end of April, in doing ditch work,
digging trenches, and in transporting aviation bombs.
Kommando 553 at Lebus was obliged to carry out work in
the front lines under the fire of Russian artillery.
Numerous comrades, drawn back at Furstenwalde, were
employed in loading bombs on German bombers.
In spite of their protests to the International
Committee of the Red Cross in Geneva and to the colonel
commanding Stalag 3-B, about billeting in barns, very
bad hygiene and insufficient food, the latter answered
that he was obeying superior orders of the O.K.W.,
ordering the prisoners to dig trenches."
I offer in proof two notes, the first addressed by the
O.K.H. to the War Prisoners Section of the Wehrmacht, and
the second by Wilhelmstrasse to the German representative at
the Wiesbaden Armistice Commission.
The memorandum of the O.K.H., dated 7th October, 1940,
constitutes Document 549. I submit it to the Tribunal as
Exhibit RF 47, and I read it in full:
According to Articles 9 and 4 of the Convention on the
Treatment of War Prisoners - of 27th July, 1929 - no
prisoners of war shall be exposed to the fire of a
combat zone. Combat zones in this sense must be
understood as the space in which normally a battle
between two armies is carried on, thus extending to a
distance of about 20 kilometres from the advance line.
On the other hand it is possible that the areas exposed
to aerial attacks do not belong to combat zones. At this
period of air war there no longer exists any sure
shelter. The fact of using war prisoners for the
construction of a camp and for the repairing of
destroyed runways does not seem to lend itself to any
controversy.
According to Article 31 of the Convention quoted here
above, war prisoners must not be used in works directly
related to war activity. The construction of shelters,
houses, and camps is not directly a war act. It is
recognised that war prisoners may be employed in the
construction of roads. Accordingly their utilisation for
the reconstruction of aviation camps that have been
destroyed is permissible: on the roads, trucks, tanks,
ammunition cars, etc. are driven, and on the aviation
fields there are planes. It is all the same.
On the other hand, it would be illegal to use war
prisoners in loading bombs, munitions, etc. on bombers.
Here a work directly related to war activity would be
involved.
By reason of the juridical situation expounded here
above, the O.K.H. has rejected the idea of withdrawing
French prisoners of war employed in work in the aviation
camps."
Now, the note of Wilhelmstrasse, to which I shall now refer,
and which I submit to the Tribunal as Exhibit RF 48 - this
note recognises, on the contrary, that prisoners submitted
to work on an aviation field incur grave danger because of
the military purpose of this work.
I will read to the Tribunal a note of the German Foreign
Office dated 14th February, 1941, Exhibit RF 48:
The French conception, according to which prisoners of
war may not be quartered near air fields and may not be
employed in repairing plane runways, cannot be based on
the exact content of Articles 9 and 31; but, on the
other hand, it is certain that French prisoners of war
quartered and employed under these conditions are in a
particularly dangerous situation, because the air fields
in occupied territories are used exclusively for German
military purposes and thus constitute a special
objective for enemy aerial attacks.
The American Embassy in Berlin has likewise made a
protest against a similar use of British prisoners of
war in Germany. Thus far no answer has been made,
because a rejection of this protest might result in
German prisoners being employed in similar work in
England." [Page 413]
Notes on statements made by the Reichsmarshal in a
meeting of 7th November, 1941, in the Reich Ministry of
Air.
Subject: Employment of Russian labour in the war
economy."
M. HERZOG: Yes.
THE PRESIDENT: Then perhaps you could summarise it.
M. HERZOG: I think, Mr. President, that it was presented by
the United States Prosecution. I shall, therefore, simply
quote an extract, the fifth and sixth paragraphs of the
first page, concerning the employment of French and Belgian
war prisoners as individuals in the economy of armament.
This use of war prisoners in the Reich munitions factories
corresponded to a common plan. It is the result of a
systematic policy. The administrative offices for labour
deliberately assigned to armament factories all war
prisoners who seemed capable of carrying out specialised
work. I quote, in this connection, Document 3005-PS. It is a
directive addressed, in 1941, by the Ministry of Labour to
the Directors of Personnel Procurement concerning the
respective use of French and Russian prisoners of war. The
document has been submitted and commented upon by my
American colleague, Mr. Dodd, shall, therefore, not read it.
I simply point out that this circular deals with the
employment of all French war prisoners in the armament
factories of the Reich.
After the capitulation of Italy, Italian soldiers who had
fallen into the hands of the Germans - they were not called
prisoners of war, but rather "military internees" - were
forced to work. I offer in this connection a directive of
the defendant Bormann, of 28th September, 1943, Document 657-
PS, which I submit to the Tribunal as Exhibit RV 52.
The Italian military internees are placed in three
categories: some ask to continue the struggle on the side of
the German Army; others desire to keep a neutral attitude;
others have turned their arms against their former allies.
The military internees of the second and third categories
must, in the terms of the circular, be forced to work. I
read:
The O.K.W., in connection with the General
Plenipotentiary for the Employment of Labour, has
regulated the treatment and the putting to work of
Italian military internees. The most important general
lines of the ordinances of the O.K.W. are the
following." [
Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
(Part 7 of 9)
[M. HERZOG continues]
"ARTICLE 27:- Belligerents may use as workers healthy
war prisoners, according to their rank and their
attitudes, with the exception of officers and
assimilated ranks. Nevertheless, if officers, or those
of assimilated rank, ask for suitable work, it will be
procured for them as far as possible. The non-
commissioned officers who are war prisoners can be
forced to
THE PRESIDENT: I think we will take judicial notice of these
Articles.
(1) It is forbidden to require non-commissioned
officers, who are prisoners, to work, unless they have
expressly requested to do so.
The National Socialist authorities systematically neglected
these imperative provisions; they have exercised violent
constraint on non-commissioned officers held in captivity,
to force them to join labour crews. They have integrated war
prisoners as workers in their factories and in the work
yards, without considering the nature of the work imposed
upon them. The utilisation of war prisoners by National
Socialist Germany took place under illegal and criminal
conditions. This I declare, and I wish to prove this to the
Tribunal.
"Work of the Non-Commissioned Officers.
"(b) The requisition of prisoners for the construction
of fortifications and for the transport of munitions,
occurs very often in the close vicinity of the line of
fire.
The National Socialist leaders, for that matter, admitted
that they used French and British prisoners of war for
military work on aerodromes exposed to allied bombardment.
"The protest of the French delegation shall be
considered unfounded. The lodging of war prisoners in
camps situated in the vicinity of aviation fields is not
in contradiction to the rules of the rights of nations.
I draw the attention of the Tribunal to this document. It
emphasises the ill faith of the leaders of National
Socialist Germany, which was two-fold: In the first place,
the note of 7th October, 1940, which I have read,
acknowledges that it is forbidden by International Law to
use prisoners of war for the loading of bombs and ammunition
on bombers. But I have just brought proof to the Tribunal
that the French prisoners of war were used for this purpose.
In the second place, the note of the O.K.H. contests the
dangerous character of the work carried out on the aviation
fields.
"Article 87 of the Agreement of 1929 on Prisoners of War
provides that, in case of difference of opinion on the
subject of the interpretation of the Agreement, the
protecting powers shall offer their services to settle
the dispute. To accomplish this, any protecting power
may propose a meeting of representatives of the
belligerent powers. In the relation between Germany and
France, protecting powers no longer exist. France
herself assumes the responsibilities of a protecting
power in questions on prisoners of war."
I shall pass on from this quotation to Page 2 of the same
document:
"As to the point in dispute, it is well to call
attention to the following:
The utilisation of war prisoners for the construction of
fortifications is substantiated by Document 828-PS, which I
file with the Tribunal as Exhibit RF 49. It is a letter of
29th September, 1944, addressed by the Chief of the First
Army Corps to the O.K.W., to give an account of work on
fortifications accomplished by eighty Belgian prisoners of
war. I quote:
"According to the teletype referred to, it is reported
that in the territory of Stalag 1-A, Stablack,
Einsatzbereich 2-213, Tilsit-Loten, near Ragnitz, there
are forty Belgian prisoners of war, and in Lindbach,
near Neusiedel, forty Belgian prisoners of war who were
employed in fortification labour."
There remains the task of proving that Allied prisoners,
forced to work in Reich armament factories, were associated
with the enemy war effort. To this end I first offer
Document 1206-PS. This document is a memorandum dated 11th
November, 1941. It is a resum6 of a report made 7th
November, 1941, to the Aviation Minister by the
Reichsmarshal. The document, consequently, establishes the
direct responsibility of the defendant Goering. The use of
Russian war prisoners is treated in a general way in this
document, but it deals also with the use of war prisoners of
Western European countries. I submit this document to the
Tribunal as Exhibit RF 50, and I read:
"Berlin, 11th November, 1941.
THE PRESIDENT: Has that already been put in by the United
States?
"Circular No. 55/43 G.R.S., Top secret. Concerns the
treatment and putting to work of Italian military
internees.