Common Methodologies of Fringe Groups
© Copyright Skeptic Magazine
Common Methodologies of Fringe Groups
In examining the revisionists' history and literature I am struck by the
similarity of their methodologies with other fringe groups. Since they
are not consciously modeling themselves after, for example, the
creationists, this may be an evolutionary sequence and ideological
pattern of many, if not most, fringe groups trying to move into the
mainstream.
Common Fallacies of Fringe Groups
The parallels between the fallacies of reasoning of revisionists and
other fringe groups, especially the creationists, are also eerily
similar.
Albert Speer: A Fallacy Test Case. A classic example of this last
fallacy is how the revisionists treat the testimonies from the Nuremberg
Trials. Nuremberg confessions are unreliable, they claim, because it was
a military tribunal run by the victors, and we all know how biased war
trials can be. The evidence, Mark Weber claims, "consists largely of
extorted confessions, spurious testimonies, and fraudulent documents.
The postwar Nuremberg trials were politically motivated proceedings
meant more to discredit the leaders of a defeated regime than to
establish truth" (1992, p. 201).
First of all, Weber has not proved that most of the confessions were
extorted, spurious, or fraudulent. But even if he were able to prove
that some of them were, this does not mean that they all were, and thus
we must always seek corroboration from other sources. But, amusingly,
revisionists do use Nuremberg trial testimonies when it suits their
cause. For example, they will reject the testimony of Nazis who said
there was a Holocaust and they participated in it, but accept testimony
of Nazis who said they knew nothing about it, such as Albert Speer. But
even here, revisionists overlook a deeper analysis. Speer did say at the
trial that he did not know about the extermination program. But his
Spandau Diary speaks volumes (1976, p. 27):
In addition, Matthias Schmidt (1984) has demonstrated that Speer not
only knew about the Final Solution, he indirectly participated in it.
Among other things, Speer organized the confiscation of 23,765 Jewish
apartments in Berlin in 1941; he knew of the deportation of more than
75,000 Jews to the east; he personally inspected the Mauthausen
concentration camp where he ordered a reduction of construction
materials and redirected supplies that were needed elsewhere; he was
present at Dora in 1943 when preparations were made to execute inmates
as a warning against sabotage in the construction of A-4 rockets; he was
apparently present at the October 6, 1943 Himmler speech when the SS-
Reichsfuehrer said, with regard to killing Jewish women and children "we
had to reach the difficult decision of making this nation vanish from
the face of the earth" (though he claims he left before Himmler began to
speak); and in 1977 he confessed in a newspaper interview: "I still see
my guilt as residing chiefly in the approval of the persecution of the
Jews and the murder of millions of them" (pp. 181-198).
Work Cited
Shermer, Michael. "Proving the Holocaust: The Refutation of
Revisionism & the Restoration of History," Skeptic, Vol. 2,
No. 4, Altadena, California, June, 1994. Published by the
Skeptics Society, 2761 N. Marengo Ave., Altadena, CA 91001,
(818) 794-3119.
Skeptic Magazine
[
Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
December 20, 1946. Everything comes down to this: Hitler always
hated the Jews; he made no secret of that at any time. He was
capable of tossing off quite calmly, between the soup and the
vegetable course, 'I want to annihilate the Jews in Europe.
This war is the decisive confrontation between National
Socialism and world Jewry. One or the other will bite the dust,
and it certainly won't be us.' So what I testified in court is
true, that I had no knowledge of the killings of Jews; but it is
true only in a superficial way. The question and my answer were
the most difficult moment of my many hours on the witness stand.
What I felt was not fear but shame that I as good as knew and
still had not reacted; shame for my spiritless silence at the
table, shame for my moral apathy, for so many acts of
repression.
http://www.skeptic.com