Nizkor - We shall remember!
A Canadian online project is showing a way of dealing with neo-Nazis
in the net without resorting to censorship.
I.
Freedom of speech is in many ways an awkward business, seeing that it
protects the views of others just as much as one's own. Some opinions
are so extreme that they give cause for doubts as to whether one ought
to allow people to express them publicly. "No freedom for the enemies of
freedom," is a slogan often used in defence of a well-fortified
democracy.
In the light of German history it is understandable that the system
of beliefs on which the Nazi regime was based is banned by law. Many
people still feel a sense of shock about the vehemence with which that
philosophy, with its contempt for mankind, its falsehoods and
contradictions, took hold of and poisoned the minds and hearts of
people.
A thinly-veiled guise in which neo-National Socialist thoughts have
been celebrating a revival since the war is the so-called revisionist
movement: under the pretext of examining the established opinions of
historians, revisionists question the reality or at least the extent of
the mass murders carried out by the Nazis on Jews and other social
groups. The revisionist theories are, of course, unable to stand up to
scientific scrutiny - yet, particularly in times of dissatisfaction and
political discontent, they constitute an initiation drug into a mental
world full of theories of conspiracy and full of hate.
Section 130 of the German Penal Code
makes the denial of the Holocaust a punishable offence as constituting
"Volksverhetzung", incitement to hatred or violence against segments of
the population. In the interests of the truth and the memory of the
victims, no one in Germany is to have to face Nazi propaganda
unprotected. No freedom for the enemies of freedom.
II.
But in view of the globalisation of the media, especially with the
rapid growth of the Internet, the German interpretation of the law and
the intuition on which it is based have recently come under a great deal
of pressure. The new communication media allow revisionist
disinformation to be displayed on one's screen with just a few clicks of
a mouse - often from countries in which it is circulated quite legally
because there are no legal provisions against hate propaganda in those
countries corresponding to the article on Volksverhetzung in German law.
The German public prosecutors are running into problems. For
instance, the Mannheim public prosecution caused a considerable stir
when at the beginning of this year it demanded that T-Online, the online
service of Deutsche Telekom, bar access to the
Web site
of the
German-Canadian neo-Nazi
Ernst Zündel.
Apart from the usual
technical problems - it is hard to filter out individual items from the
bulk of the information offered by an Internet server - the German
authorities also faced unexpected political opposition. Network
activists, on the whole anything but sympathisers with the neo-Nazi
scene - offered their protection to Zündel, mirroring his Web pages
on their servers. The American
Declan McCullagh,
for instance, who
recently also took the incriminated Issue No. 154 of the German
autonomist newspaper "Radikal" under his wing. The public prosecution's
campaign came to naught.
The motto of this counter-campaign is freedom of speech and
expression, and: fight censorship. Here German security-mindedness,
which wants to put a legal stop once and for all to the spectre of the
past, comes up against a fairly contrary understanding of democracy and
human rights, influenced particularly by American individualism: this
latter aims at maximum freedom of the individual and as little
government control as possible, political opinions are to be formed
through the free interplay of forces. To European minds this
"libertarian" American ideology is unfamiliar and often difficult to
comprehend. The "left versus right" scale we are accustomed to using in
assessing the political field can scarcely be applied here.
An event that took place in 1979 served as a forerunner and model for
the current conflicts. On that occasion, the famous American linguist,
philosopher and civil rights campaigner,
Noam Chomsky,
lent his support
to the French revisionist
Faurisson.
Chomsky eloquently resisted all
accusations of being roped in to the revisionist cause, using arguments
worth considering here: "It is elementary that freedom of expression
(including academic freedom) is not to be restricted to views of which
one approves, and that it is precisely in the case of views that are
almost universally despised and condemned that this right must be most
vigorously defended," as Chomsky wrote at the time in an article in The
Nation.
III.
Opponents can safely be given a chance to speak, for if you have the
truth on your side, openness and lucidity turn into weapons. This
attitude also forms the basis of what is probably one of the most
impressive current projects for combating revisionism: under the name of
"Nizkor",
Hebrew for "we shall remember", the American
Ken McVay
has
collected what is at present the largest online Holocaust library in the
world. He views his collection explicitly as a fund from which opponents
of revisionism can help themselves in order to counter the obvious and
less obvious historical distortions of the revisionists with an
overwhelming wealth of facts.
McVay began his project in 1992. Shocked and angered by the
increasing presence of right-wing extremist opinions in the online media
he set to work: he collected historical sources about the holocaust and
other material and put them on the Internet. What started out as a
one-man operation has meanwhile turned into a network of over 50
volunteers from all over the world. The project is financed through
donations and the small income McVay makes on lectures and similar
activities. In 1995 Ken McVay was awarded the
"Order of British Columbia"
for his efforts.
McVay and his helpers have recently started to process the files from
the original FTP-archive
in a highly professional manner for the World
Wide Web. Nizkor is an impressive demonstration of how excellently the
Web is suited to making huge amounts of knowledge available in an
ergonomically suitable way.
The conversion
is, however, a long way from
being completed. Nizkor is said to be "under permanent construction".
There is another reason why there is no end of this project in sight.
Apart from the historical events of the holocaust, the Nizkor archives
also document the current status of revisionism and its followers -
allowing one to obtain a quick overview of the proponents and their
ideology. The protagonists' biographies and the documentation of their
activities are constantly being updated, for instance by monitoring the
newsgroup
alt.revisionism.
Nizkor pursues a whole range of aims: it wants to encourage
historical investigations into and educational projects on the
holocaust; it wants to observe and document the revisionist scene; it
wants to expose and refute its misrepresentation of history; it wants
its educational work to help keep the right-wing extremist scene
isolated and marginalised.
Nizkor's goals could hardly be accomplished if access to the
right-wing extremists' materials were blocked by the government. In this
sense McVay's project requires a "libertarian" attitude. But there is no
trace of a too liberal or even conciliatory attitude towards its
opponents. Nizkor's staff stand up determined and purposeful against
those who refuse to see reason, and they allow themselves a certain
degree of emotionality: one senses anger and contempt, and sometimes
their opponents are the butt of bitter scorn and derision.
Nizkor is undoubtedly something of a model. But unfortunately
imperturbability and courage cannot readily be copied.
SPIEGEL ONLINE 43/1996
Only to be duplicated with the consent of the SPIEGEL publishing company.
The
original article
is available on
http://www.spiegel.de/.
[
Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
By Lorenz Lorenz-Meyer