5.2.1. The VSB for 1989 explicitly placed Irving alongside revisionists like Christophersen, Zündel, Walter Ochsenberger, and Gerd Honsik as belonging to one camp.<195> The VSB Rheinland-Pfalz stated that `After 1988 Irving shares the conviction of right-wing extremist revisionists who see the Holocaust as a propaganda lie.'<196>
-----
5.3 1990: `Truth Frees' ['Wahrheit macht Frei').
5.3.1. In 1991 Irving undertook at least eight visits to Germany: 11
February to 10 March, 10 to 11 April, 20 to 22 April, 3 to 10 June, 1 to
3 August, 26 to 31 August, 2 to 10 September, and 3 October. A note of
caution is required because Irving's diary entries
[Page 59]
from 22 November to 6 December are missing.
5.3.2. From February to March 1990 Irving toured Germany for more than
a month, organised again with Althans, Phillip, and Zündel.<197> All
of them were obviously excited about the virgin terrain the former GDR
offered for revisionism.<198> Zündel wrote to Irving about the
preparations.
5.3.3. On 13 February Irving spoke in Dresden on the anniversary of the
Allied bombing. He was to hold a press conference at 2 p.m. in the foyer
of the Hotel Gewandhaus and his speech at 5 p.m. in the
Kulturpalast.<200> The Kulturpalast had been booked by Althans and his
German Youth Education Project [Deutschen Jugendbildungswerkes
-DJBW].<201> Despite a large media presence, Irving seems to have felt
little reason to restrain his opinions. The Swiss Weltwoche recorded
Irving as saying `Do you know what I like about the GDR: here the people
don't have this tortured conscience as they do over there.'<202> He was
also quoted as having said that Auschwitz was `A huge Allied propaganda
lie.'<203> This would accord with a later statement by Althans, who
wrote '...Irving spoke to almost 1,000 people in the Dresden Palace of
Culture on the anniversary of the Anglo-American terror attack on
Dresden. In the following podium
----- [Page 60]
discussion, Irving clearly declared his belief in revisionism.'<204> The
Dresden speech was filmed by Sepp Geiger, but no copy has been made
available in lrving's discovery.<205>
5.3.4. On 14 February attempts were made for Irving to address a
meeting in Leipzig apparently because `Berlin is cancelled. [Franz]
Schoenhuber won't go along'.<206> On 23 February Irving spoke in
Landshut to the Working Group Historical Truth [`Arbeitskreis
Historische Wahrheit']. <207> This was the speech, according to later
appeal documents, on which the city of Passau banned Irving from
speaking to the DVU on 10 March, because Irving had presented his theory
`that there had never been a gassing of Jews' and that `The figure of 6
million murdered Jews was described by the plaintiff thereby as a life
lie [`Lebenslüge'] by the state of Israel as a means of permanent
financial and political blackmail.'<208>
5.3.5. In the following days two planned meetings in Stuttgart and
Augsburg fell through.<209> Althans promised lrving a press conference,
in Nuremberg, but.Irving was.worried about Althans's intentions. `I am
suspicious of the press conf.[erence], it sounds as though he wants me
ti [Sic] disavow Frey. I don't see the point of that.' <210> On 28
February Irving spoke in Cologne Deutz, organised by a certain
Benscheid.<211>
----- [Page 61]
5.3.6. On 1 March Irving gave testimony in defence of Ernst-Günter
Kögel before the magistrate's court [Amtsgericht] in Remscheid.<212>
Kögel was charged with providing his own introduction to Irving's
London press conference of 23 June 1989 launching the Leuchter
Report.<213> It is not clear what form this report took, but it appears
that Kögel had tried to distribute it in some numbers. <214> In a
indication of things to come, Karl Philipp expressed surprise that
Irving was admitted as a witness at all, because the existence of the
gas chambers in Auschwitz was usually considered manifest [Offenkundig]
in German courts.<215>
5.3.7. In his report on Irving's court appearance Philipp wrote: `In
his statement the researcher of contemporary history [Irving] went into
the Leuchter Report .and reaffirmed his view, according to which it was
not possible for there to have been gas chambers for killing people in
Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Majdanek.'<216> In this first instance the
court found in Kögel's favour that he had only wanted to start a
discussion.<217> In the second instance in 1992 he was fined DM 12,600
on the charge of incitement to hatred [Volksverhetzung].<218>
5.3.8. On 2 March Irving spoke in Kiel at a meeting organised through
Dieter Munier of the Arndt Verlag. He stayed overnight with Munier,
where he met Gerlind Möhring.<219> The meeting had replaced one planned
with Pedersen, someone known to Christophersen.<220> The next morning
Irving had a conference with Munier `about his project for a polemical
historical brochure by me on the ODER NEISSE territory.
----- [Page 62]
Agreed on a DM 15,000 fee, of which he paid DM3000 at once...''<221>
5.3.9. 3 March was a delicate day for Irving. It had been long planned
that he make his first appearance before the NL in Hamburg, at a meeting
chaired by Christian Worch.<222> This was an important meeting for
Irving for two reasons . Firstly he had to make good a certain amount of
bad feeling resulting from his speech in Hagenau the previous November.
Worch had written to Zündel on 1 January 1990, concerning Althans'
suggestion that Worch take responsibility for Irving's appearance in
Hamburg during his forthcoming tour. Worch mentioned his doubts about
organising a speech after Irving's `small "faux pas"' [`kleinen "fauz
pas"] in Hagenau
5.3.10. Zündel duly wrote to Irving chiding him for his `poor tactics'.
His comments in Hagenau had alienated supporters from northern Germany
who, as a result, were considering no longer .inviting Irving to
speak.<224> Secondly Michael Kühnen himself was due to appear at the
meeting. Hence perhaps the unusually frantic. security efforts.<225>
All this added to the importance of the meeting.
5.3.11. Worch had promised Irving, that although his appearance in
Hamburg was organised
----- [Page 63]
by the NL and invitations had been sent out on NL stationary, it was in
essence a meeting organised by him as a private person. Irving would be
the only speaker, there would be no party emblems, and his appearance
would not be `politically "exploited"' [`politisch
"ausgeschlachtet"'].<226> But Worch was obviously overjoyed at the
political resonance of attracting Irving as a speaker. He wrote to
Zündel `DM 1,000 for the speaker and DM 300 for the organiser seems to
me decidedly cheap. It is worth double or triple the amount to me.'<227>
5.3.12. Irving described the rest of the evening himself.
5.3.13. What this `super' speech contained was Irving's gospel that
there had been no gassings in Auschwitz, or indeed anywhere else for
that matter.
----- [Page 64]
5.3.14. Tellingly Irving openly admitted that what he was saying was
illegal. `We are always running the danger that we will be arrested
...because what we say boarders, that is very dangerous. Because what we
say is [interrupted by commotion in the hall].'<230> Later in the talk
Irving asked someone who had entered the room why he had come in. After
a long pause, during which the new arrival is escorted out Irving
explained, `It is clear that I am saying before you is, pretty
explosive. Very dangerous., I don't want to go to prison because he
comes in with a unauthorized person and does as if he's [an] interested
observer.<231>
5.3.15. Irving fails to mention in his diary if Kühnen was there or
not, but the journalist Michael Schmidt was likewise present on the same
evening.in the Alte Muehle, in the company of Gerald Hess who gave him
permission to try and film. Schmidt attests that Irving and Kühnen
arrived together.'<232> Whether Irving and Kühnen talked together or
appeared on the same platform must remain speculation. From his diary it
would seem evident that Irving was pleased with his appearance before
the NL. Irving was likewise obviously pleased to have met the Worschs.
He wrote to them thanking them for. their friendly help and support, and
expressing his hope to see them in Munich on 21 April 1990 at the coming
revisionist conference.<233>
----- [Page 65]
5.3.16. Benedict gives the wider background to the meeting. The NL, the
Lichtenberg neo-Nazi `comrades', and `fighters' of various neo-Nazi
groups (DA, FAP, NA) and a hundred others from DVU and NPD were all in
Hamburg that day. Parts of them were hindered by the police. Others
demonstrated freely against the Soviet Consulate.<234> Further she
claims that Irving received applause from older members of the audience,
especially SS veterans. She also mentions that this was a turning point
for east-Berlin activists who up until the evening had not had
fundamental doubts about the fact of the Holocaust.'<235>
5.3.17. On 4 March a hall was booked by Althans and the AV™ in the
Berghotel Porta Westfalica.<236> Udo Walendy was the organiser. <237>
The meeting was relocated unnecessarily by `Wosch or Althans' to the
Kollegium Humanum in Vlotho.<238> `Major meeting, around 350 people.
Speech very well received. It was a good, heated, demagogic speech, with
every punch line brilliantly delivered and hugely applauded.'
5.3.18. On 8 March Irving spoke about the `Future of the Germans' in
Hamburg.<240> The meeting was organised by Ulrich Harder. <241> Ulrich
Harder was leader of the Hamburg NPD and one-time leader of the 1982
founded Hamburg List to Stop Foreigners [Hamburger Liste für
Ausaenderstopp - HLA].<242> Irving had known Harder since 1984, when
Harder had worked for the Society for Culture and Contemporary History
[Verein für Kultur and Zeitgeschichte] whom Irving had addressed. <243>
The meeting does not appear in Irving's itinerary of 6 February 1990,
and therefore may have been organised. spontaneously.<244>
----- [
Previous ·
Index ·
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
<195> Verfassungsschutz-Bericht 1989.
<196> Verfassungsschutz-Bericht, Rheinland-Pfalz, 1989, p. 86, fn. 71.
Althans is going to be in the "DDR" for at least a week, he is en
route there now, to see if he can get a University Forum for you to
talk. This is new ground we are breaking there, so it will be a
real test of Ewalds skills!'<199>
<197> Ernst Zündel to Irving, 5 January 1990. See also Irving to
Althans, 31 December 1989; Irving to Karl Philipp, 6 February 1990. 'It
has emerged that Zündel, who is now out of jail, has paid Althans an
honorarium to arrange this tour, which he has done very well in
Dresden.' Diary entry, 13 February 1990. See also diary entries, 6
December 1989, 31 December 1989, 25 January 1990, 28 January 1990, 3
February 1990, 5 February
1990, 6 February 1990, 13 February 1990, and 18 February 1990
<198> For example Ernst Zündel, `David living' n.d., open letter in
preparation for Irving's forthcoming tour of Germany, February - March
1990. `My muzzle won't last for ever. This Irving tour can be seen, so-
to-say, as a sort of "manouever" for the future!' [`Mein Maulkorb wird
ja nicht ewig dauern. Diese Irving-Tournee kann also sozusagen als eine
Art "Maneuver" for die Zukunft gelten!'].
<199> Ernst Zündel to living, 5 January 1990.
<200> Althans and Phillip were both listed as contactable in the same
hotel on the same day. See B. Ewald Althans, Presse-Erklaerung, n.d.
<201> `Nutzungsvertrag zwischen dem Kulturpalast Dresden ... and dem
Deutschen Jugendbildungswerk, Herrn B. Ewald Althans', 18 January 1990.
<202> `Wissen Sie, das gefällt mir an der DDR: Hier haben die Menschen noch nicht dieses gequälte Schuldbewusstsein wie drüben.' Die
Weltwoche, No. 9, 1 March 1990.
<203> `Eine grosse Propaganda-Lüge der Alliierten.' Ibid.
<204>`...am Jahrestag des Anglo-Amerikanischen Terrorangriffes auf
Dresden hat David Irving vor fast 1000
Personen im Kulturpalast der Stadt Dresden gesprochen. In der
anschlieáenden Podiumdiskussion bekannte sich Irving klar zum
Revisionismus.' Ewald Althans, open letter to mobilise support for
Irving's February - March 1990 tour of Germany, n.d.
<205> `...asked if he [Geiger] can produce Dresden videos for me to
market, by weekend ....' Diary entry, 18
February 1990. `Sepp [Geiger] has brought 25 videos of my DRESDEN
speech.' Diary entry, 23 February 1990. See living to Ewald Althans, 2
April 1-990, where, Irving discussed video-ahd-brochure rights
withAlthans for: his various speeches. ("die verbotene Rede von Passau"
/ "Wahrheit macht Frei" in Moers / "Dresden" speech). See further diary
entry, 13 February 1990.
<206> Berlin fällt aus. Schönhuber zieht nicht mit[.]' Irving to
Karl Philipp, 6 February 1990.
<207> 'Vollzug des Ausländergesetzes (Aus1G) Ausweisung aus der
Bundesrepublik Deutschland', n.d., pp. 6-7.
<208> 'Zum Thema Judenvernichtung vertrat er auch in dieser
Veranstaltung seine These, dass es nie eine Vergasung von Juden gegeben
habe.[ ...] Die Zahl von 6 Millionen getouuml;teten Juden bezeichnetete der
Klaeger dabei als Lebenslüge des Staates Israel als Mittel zur
ständigen Erpressung auf finanziellen and politischem Gebiet.'
Staatsanwaltschaft Regensburg to the Bayerischen Verwaltungsgericht,
entered 4 October 1990. In his
comments on the claims of the public prosecutor, Irving claimed to have
had no idea who was ' "behind"' the meeting in Landshut, although other
documents show that it had been organised by Ewald Althans. Irving to
Michael von Sprenger, 21 November 1991; diary entry, 18 February 1990
<209> Irving to Karl Philipp, 6 February 1990; diary entry, 24 February
1990.
<210> Diary entry, 18 February 1990.
<211> Diary entry, 28 February 1990.
<212> See diary entries, 28 February 1990 and 1 March 1991. Kögel
was defended by Hajo Hermann and Krempel.
<213> 'Hoped I managed to help Kögel, a gentle, whitehaired, retired
Studienrat who quoted my June 23, 1989 press conference in a pamphlet
and was at once indicted in West Germany for having done so.' Diary
entry, 1 March 1990. See also Karl Philipp, "'Auschwitzlüge" -Prozess
in Remscheid,' 1 March- 1990.
<214> ID-Archiv im ISSG (ed.), Drahtzieher im braunen Netz: Der
Wiederaufbau der 'NSDAP' (Berlin/Amsterdam, 1992), p. 28; Mecklenburg,
p. 481.
<215> Karl Philipp `"Auschwitzlüge"-Prozess in Remscheid,' I March
1990. Leuchter had been rejected by the court as a witness for the
defence. See also diary entry, 17 December 1990. '...K Philipp phoned,
was fined DM 3600 for his Anmerkung, das Wort "Lüge" comment, the word
["lie"]. Remscheid.'
<216> 'In seiner Aussage ging der Zeitgeschichtsforscher auf das
Leuchter-Gutachten ein and bekräftigte seinen Standpunkt, wonach es
weder in Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek Gaskammem zur Totting von
Menschen gegeben haben konnte.' Karl Philipp, "'Auschwitzlüge"-Prozess in Remscheid,' 1 March 1990.
<217> Ibid. Drahtzieher im braunen Netz, p. 28.
<218> Drahtzieher im braunen Netz, p. 28; Mecklenburg, p. 481.
<219> Diary entry, 2 March 1990.
<220> 'I have heard from Mr. Pedersen that he has invited you to a
conference.' ['Von Hewn Pedersen habe ich gehoert, dass er Sie Anfang
März zu einer Tagung eingaladen hat'] Thies Christophersen to Irving, 31
January 1990. See also Irving to Karl Philipp, 6 February 1990.
when he had to bring up these stories about the Riga shootings. But
Ewald [Althans] explained to me that Irving has a choice of two
presentations on this tour, with which we don't have to reckon with
such irritating details for our listeners.[...] Naturally clearly
more agreeable than the presentation in Hagenau!<223>
<221> Diary entry, 3 March 1990.
<222> 'Vollzug des Ausländergesetzes (AusIG) Ausweisung aus der
Bundesrepublik Deutschland', n.d., p. 7.
<223> '...als er unbedingt dim rigaschen Erschiepungsgeschichten auf
den Tisch bringen musste. Ewald [Althans] hat mir jedoch erklärt, dap
Irving bei dieser Tournee zwei Vortraege zur Auswahl hat, bei denen mit
derlei for unsere Zuhoerer irritierenden Einzelheiten nicht zu rechnen
sei [...] natarlich deutlich sympathischer als der Vortrag von Hagenau!'
Christian Worch to Ernst Zündel, 1 January 1990.
<224> Ernst Zündel to Irving, 29 [no month] 1989. In a list of planned meetings for the forthcoming tour, a person named as 'Toronto' [Ernst
Zündel] commented under Hamburg 3 March 'organiser asks you not to
mention the Riga Document'. Irving was obviously unhappy to have
received the list of dates direct from 'Toronto'. He informed Sally Cox
that he had 'cut off' Toronto's name on the enclosed list 'for various
reasons'. Irving to Sally Cox, 4 January 1990 [misdated 1989]. To
Philipp he wrote that he would have preferred to have received a list
from Althans for 'formal legal reasons' ['Aus formaljuristischen
Granden...'] because 'after all he (?) is
organising the meetings' ['...veranstaltet ja er (?) die
Versammlungen.']. Philipp reassured him that 'a guarentee [sic] from
Zündel is nevertheless worth more than one from Ewald [Althans], ['Eine
Garantie von Zündel ist allerdings bedeutender als die von Ewald].'
Karl Philipp to living, 5 January 1990.
<225> Christian Worch to Ewald Althans, 16 January 1990; Christian
Worch to Irving, 9 February 1990; 'Sicherheits- and
Organisationsinformation filr das Tournee-Management von David Irving',
2 March 1990.
Rumours come that tonight there is to be much violence, etc., and
Munier persuades me to cancel the Nationale Liste meeting - since
(a) the press has got wind of it, and (b) Michael Kühnen is to be
present; and to attend only the Burschenschaft Germania meeting
later in the evening. This evoked consternation, then
comprehension, in Althans, .... Zündel (!)(in Toronto!) is somehow
eingeschaltet [brought in]. I drove to Hamburg .... Meanwhile
Althans phoned from the NL venue, the Alte Muehle, insisting that I
attend the NL function, major crowd there, 300, no trouble, no
police, no problems. So I drove out there at speed, made a rousing
speech, which was very well received, then zipped on to the
Burschenschaft Germania .... There were surly faces against me at
the NL meeting when I arrived. An attractive girl, 25 (who turned
out to be Christian Worch's wife), snarled at me that I had
"disappointed" her by my earlier stance this day. But at the end of
the meeting all were pleased. It was a good speech -- knorke
[super], I think my current biographical subject [Goebbels] would
say.<228>
But I no longer believe in this legend. I say the following. There
were no gas chambers in Auschwitz, only dummies, built by the Poles
in the years following the war, exactly like the dummies the
Americans built in Dachau that had to be torn down by the Americans
at the orders of the West German government because they were
dummies. But the dummies are still standing in Auschwitz, because
the German government has no sway there. And understandably that is
a problem for you that you have a government in Bonn that allows
its
<226> Christian Worch to Irving, 9 February 1990.
<227> 'Tausend Mark für den Redner and dreihundert Mark für die
Organisatoren erscheinen mir ausgesprochen billig. Es waere mir auch das
Doppelte oder Dreifache wert.' Christian Worch to Ernst Zündel, 1
January 1990.
<228> Diary entry, 3 March 1990.
own people to be defamed by all the countries of the world,
although in the meantime it is cried out that these things in
Auschwitz, and probably in Majdanek, Treblinka, and in other so-called extermination camps in the east are all dummies.<229>
<229> `Aber jetzt glaube ich such dieser Legende nicht [that something
happened in Auschwitz] mehr. Ich sage folgendes. In Auschwitz hat es
keine Gaskammern gegeben, es hat nur Attrapen gegeben, die von den Polen
erbaut wurden in den Nachkriegsjahren, genau so wie die Atttapen die die
AmerikanerirrDachau-,gebauthaben and die von den Amerikaner dann wieder
weggeraeumt mussten, als Dachau auf Befehl der westdeutschen Regierung,
denn dass waren ja nur Attrapen. Aber die Attrapen bestehen heute immer
noch in Auschwitz. Denn da hat die deutsche Regierung nicht das Wort zu
reden. Und das ist selbstverständlich für Sie ein Problem, dass Sie
eine Regierung in Bonn haben, die es dauernd duldet' dass das eigene Volk
von sämtlichen Ländern der Welt dffamiert wird, obwohl inzwischen zum
Himmel geschrien wird dass diese Sachen in Auschwitz, and wahrscheinlich
auch in Majdanek, Treblinka, and in anderen Vernichtungslagem sogennant
im Osten alle nur Attrappen sind.' Videocassette 187, `David living in
Moers', 5 March 1990.
<230> "Wir laufen immer in Gefahr' dass wir verhaftet werden wurden, dann was wir hier jetzt sagen nicht gegen mich steht ja jetzt in
Österreich schon Haftbefehl wieder zum zweiten Mal, denn dass was wir
sagen, das grenzt, das ist auáerst gefaehrlich. Denn das was wir sagen
ist...' Ibid.
<231> ` Es ist ganz klar was ich heute vor Ihnen sage ist ziemlich
brisant. Sehr gefährlich. Ich möchte nicht dafür sitzen, das er mit
eine Unbefugte reinkommt and so tut als ob er intressierte or Beobachter
ist.' Ibid.
<232> Heute gehoert uns dei Stasse, pp. 125-127.
<233> Irving to Christian Worch, 14 March 1990.
<234> Benedict, p. 41.
<235> Benedict, p. 42.
<236> Edgar Spier to B. Ewald Althans, 30 January 1990
<237> Udo Walendy, 'Einladung zu einer bedeutsamen
Vortragsveranstaltung von David living', n.d. Irving had
been invited by Walendy to speak at his annual meeting (north of
Darmstadt) for March 1989, but Irving had
turned him down as he would be in America. See Udo Walendy to Irving, 7
January 1989; living to Udo
Walendy, 13 January 1989
<238> Ibid.
<239> Diary entry, 4 March 1990.
<240> 'Ideologische Aufrüstung fir Deutschnationale,' TAZ, 19 March
1990.
<241> '...she [Sally] said Ulrich Harder had phoned wanting urgently to
contact me. Phoned him. He wants to
organise immediate Hamburg meeting. We rapidly agreed Thursday, fee
DM750.' Dairy entry, 28 February
1990. See also diary entry, 8 March 1990.
<242> Mecklenburg, p. 285; Hirsch, p. 159.
<243> Ulrich Harder to Irving, 30 April 1984; Irving, 'Public
Speaking', a list of contact addresses, n.d. [c.1985].
<244> Irving to Karl Philipp, 6 February 1990