David Irving: 1992 Canadian Immigration
David Irving
9543-8079
The issue is whether or not you are a Canadian citizen or a
permanent resident and if not, whether you are a person
described in paragraph 27(2)(i) of the Immigration Act.
Paragraph 27(2)(i) reads as follows:
"......that a person In Canada, other than a Canadian
citizen or permanent resident, is a person who has not left
Canada on or before the date specified in a departure notice
that was issued to that person or. having so left Canada.
has been allowed to come into Canada pursuant to paragraph
14(1)(C)."
The evidence discloses that you entered Canada as a visitor
at Niagara Falls on October 26, 1992 and that you
subsequently became the subject of an immigration inquiry at
Vancouver, British Columbia on October 30, 1992. As a
result, you were issued a departure notice to leave Canada
on or before midnight, November 01, 1992.
The most significant evidence to come out of this inquiry
which is the centre of dispute between yourself and
immigration officials, is your assertion that you left
Canada on October 30, 1992 at Blaine, Washington and
reentered Canada later that same day.
This purported departure is pivotal, since if it is
factually accurate, it would mean that the action taken
against you by immigration officials in Niagara Falls on
November 01, 1992 was based on erroneous facts; namely, that
you were a person attempting to leave Canada pursuant to a
yet unexecuted departure notice.
If, as you claim, you did
in fact depart and then reenter Canada at the
Washington/B.C. border crossing then it might be said that
you had already satisfied the terms of your departure notice
and therefore could not be a person referred to in paragraph
14(1)(C) of the Act. However, the question as to whether you
did or did not leave is an issue of fact for this tribunal
to determine.
The evidence discloses that at the conclusion of your
inquiry in Vancouver on October 30, 1992 you were approached
by Mr. Brian Fisher, a Canadian citizen, who resides in the
United States. You claim Mr. Fisher sought you out in order
to have you counter sign fifty lithographs which had been
executed by the notorious Konard Kujau who is known for the
infamous forgery of the Adolph Hitler diaries.
You testified
Mr. Fisher is a collector of memorabilia and had acquired
these sets at a considerable expense. Mr. Kujau had
pencilled his signature on the prints and Mr. Fisher wanted
your signature on them as well. You agreed to do Mr. Fisher
this favour in return for his help in gathering your
personal effects from Vancouver Island. He agreed to drive
you to the Island and back, in return you agreed to go to
his home in Ferndale, Washington State to sign the
lithographs.
You testified that you left the mainland at 2:00pm and upon
your arrival in Victoria you gathered your belongings and
consulted with your lawyer. You left Vancouver Island on the
8:00pm ferry arriving on the mainland at 9:4Opm. You drove
directly down route 99 to the United States border at
Blaine, Washington crossing between 10:15 and 10:30pm. Mr.
Fisher presented both of your passports to an United States
Immigration Officer who, upon looking at your document, made
a comment concerning your name which you felt was off
colour. No stamp was placed in your passport and you were
granted entry.
You proceeded to Mr. Fishers home in Ferndale, a community
located a short distance from Blaine. You arrived at Mr.
Fishers home shortly before 11:00pm. where you were met by
Helga Ashton whom you describe as Mr. Fishers ladyfriend.
She offered you a beer and you watched the Canadian news on
television where you saw film coverage of yourself outside
the courthouse in Vancouver earlier in the day driving away
with Mr. Fisher in his car.
You placed three telephone calls
while at this residence. The first telephone call was to the
residence of Mr. Heinz Koppe, your Vancouver area organizer.
You testified that there was no answer.
This caused you concern and you were worried that the Koppe
family may have already gone to bed and you would therefore
not be able to collect the boxes of books you had stored
there. You then called the Koppe home minutes later and
Sandra Koppe answered the telephone. You testified that this
was at 11:15pm.
You also placed a telephone call to Mr. Paul
Norris, an associate in Toronto in order to cancel some
speaking engagements in the Ottawa area and to advise him of
your desire to concentrate your efforts in Toronto. You then
signed the fifty lithographs and departed Mr. Fishers
residence at 11:20 pm.
Mr. Fisher drove you back to Canada and you appeared at the
Canadian border at 11:25 or 11:30pm. You claim Mr. Fisher
presented both of your passports to a Canadian officer who
looked at the documents and handed them back without
question or comment.
You then proceeded into Canada where
you met with Sandra Koppe at an exit off the highway. She
guided you and Mr. Fisher to their family home where you
stayed until 1:00am. You then went to the Delta hotel near
the airport and departed to Toronto on a 8:00am flight.
On November 01, 1992 you travelled by auto to the United
States border at Niagara Falls. At 23:20 hours you were
refused admission and returned to Canada.
You were
interviewed by a Canadian immigration officer, who upon
learning of the earlier departure notice, allowed you to
come into Canada pursuant to paragraph 14(1)(C) of the
Immigration Act then arrested you. Immigration authorities
now contend that you did not, at any time in fact,
physically leave Canada until this attempted entry to the
United States at Niagara.
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[ Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Adjudication Tribunal Report