The Shallit Report: Lies of Our Times
David John Cawdell Irving is a British "historian", born in 1938.
According to David Cesarani of the Wiener Library in London, England,
he attended Imperial College at the University of London, but never
graduated. He holds no academic degree and no academic position at any
university or college. He calls himself a "moderate fascist", and
claims, among other things that the gas chambers at Auschwitz (in which
an estimated 2--3 million people died) were "built by the Poles after
the war as a tourist attraction." (For this remark, he was fined DM
10,000 by a Munich court in May 1992. The judge was quoted as saying
that the gas chambers of Auschwitz were "an historically certain
fact.")
Irving denies being a "Holocaust denier" or "Hitler apologist", and
seems willing to resort to legal action if necessary.
In a recent fax printed in the K-W Record, he is reported as
saying, "I have warned 22 British newspapers that I shall not
hesitate to commence libel action if they use smear phrases such
like 'Hitler apologist' or 'Holocaust denier' to embellish their
writings." But Bernard Levin, writing in the Times of London in
May of this year, quoted Irving as saying, "I hope the court will fight
a battle for the German people and put an end to the blood lie of
the Holocaust which has been told against this country for 50 years."
Irving first entered the headlines in 1970. In July of that year, he
was forced to apologize in the High Court of London for "making a
wholly untrue and highly damaging statement about a woman writer." -- not
an auspicious start for someone who claims to be in pursuit of the
truth. Later that year, Irving was back in the headlines, concerning
publication of his book, "The Destruction of Convoy PQ17". Ostensibly
an expose of an ill-fated 1942 Arctic convoy headed for the Soviet
Union during World War II, it eventually resulted in Irving being fined
40,000 British pounds for libel. Irving's book faulted Captain John
Broome, commander of the convoy at the time, saying he was guilty of
"downright disobedience" and "downright desertion of the convoy."
Broome brought suit against Irving for false statements, and won a
judgment in August of 1970. Irving's lawyers appealed, and lost in
March, 1971. The case is revealing because of what it says about
Irving's abilities as a historian and his motives as an author.
According to the Times of London, Irving showed a copy of the
manuscript to Broome before publication. Broome objected to the
accuracy of some thirty passages in the book, and threatened to sue for
libel if Irving did not make changes. At that point, William Kimbers
Ltd., Irving's publisher, notified him that they would not publish the
book as it was then written. Later, Irving published the book with
another publisher.
The court found that Irving "was warned from most responsible quarters
that his book contained libels on Captain Broome... To make [the book]
a success he was ready to risk libel actions... Documentary evidence
.... showed that [Irving] had deliberately set out to attack Captain
Broome and in spite of the most explicit warnings persisted in his
attack because it would help sell the book." The court labeled
Irving's conduct as "outrageous and shocking."
Irving's misrepresentations did not end with the publication of his book.
According to Cesarani, in 1979, a German publisher had to pay
compensation to the father of
by
Anne Frank after printing the German
edition of Irving's book, Hitler's War. Irving had claimed that Anne
by
Frank's diary was a forgery.
Irving claims that according to his "research", the Holocaust is
greatly exaggerated. (He was recently quoted in the K-W Record as
saying that the number of Jews who died in concentration camps
was "of the order of 100,000 or more.") But during the 1988 trial
of pro-Nazi publisher Ernst Zundel, he was forced to admit under
cross-examination that he hadn't
even read all of Eichmann's 1960 trial testimony. (In this testimony,
Eichmann admitted that Nazi leaders discussed the so-called "Final
Solution to the Jewish problem''-- extermination, in 1942.)
In November 1991, a reporter from the Independent showed that Irving
omitted crucial lines from a translation of Goebbels' diaries -- lines
that would have contradicted his theory that Hitler knew nothing about
the extermination of the Jews.
Irving's record is clear: he is not an historian, and he has
made false statements and been forced to apologize for them.
As Andrew Cohen, reporter for the
Financial Post, has said, "David Irving should be denied credibility."
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
David Irving's reply to Mr. Shallit
is available from the CODOH web site.
[
Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
David Irving