DONITZ (concluded):
Treatment of neutrals-argument on declaration and
extent of operational areas; The Athenia case.
Treatment of shipwrecked : Exception from duty to
rescue; Defendant's Laconia order of 17.9.42-its motivation
and interpretation.
Denial of defendant's participation in preparation of
aggression argument against retroactive effect of joining a
conspiracy after its inception (see Part 7).
Commando order; Employment of concentration camp
labour.
RAEDER (see Part 4; Part 14) Appraisal of violations of Versailles Treaty and of their non-aggressive motives; of the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as condonation of previous treaty violations. Planning of aggression : Evaluation of Hitler speeches,
The Athenia case.
Aggressions; particularly against Norway - preventive
character of the campaign; Commando order.
Argument against conspiratorial responsibility of
military leadership for political decisions on war.
SCHIRACH (see Part 4; Part 14; Part 15).
Defendant's youth education programme, his peaceful
aims and...
...his methods; His attitude to Church and religion; Concentration camps; Jewish question.
SAUCKEL (see Part 4; Part 6; Part 15).
Argument on concept of slave labour and deportation;
Employment of foreign labour - its admissibility under
International Law.
Execution of foreign labour utilization programme;
Limitations of defendant's responsibility; His efforts for
improvement of recruitment methods; of working and living
conditions.
JODL (see Part 4; Part 6; Part 15; Part 16)
Argument against defendant's participation in a
conspiracy, 123 ;
His part in aggressions from 1938 to 1941.
Division between political and military spheres and
responsibilities-scope of defendant's position.
Commando order; Partisan warfare; Scorched earth policy
in Norway.
Argument on actus and mens rea as elements of crime and
on doctrine of superior orders.
SEYSS-INQUART (see Part 4; Part 6; Part 16).
Austria: her history and the Anschluss idea since World War
I; Defendant's role; International recognition of Anschluss.
The Netherlands: Encroachments on Dutch sovereignty and...
...administration; on economy; Independent position of
police; Hostages; Deportations; Jewish question; Famine at
the end of 1944.
Arguments by counsel on documentary evidence for indicted
organisations
BORMANN (see Part 4; Part 17; Part 18)
Argument on question of defendant's death; of his true
influence.
PAPEN (see Part 5; Part 16)
Defendant's Chancellorship in 1932: his efforts for a
compromise with Nazi Party and for restriction of its
influence; Continuation of his policy during his
Vice-Chancellorship under Hitler; Oppositionist Marburg
speech and blood purge of 30.6.34.
Austria: Defendant's appeasement policy and his
activities as Ambassador Extraordinary in Vienna;
Berchtesgaden conference of 12.2.38.
Defendant's mission to Ankara.
SPEER (see Part 6; Part 16; Part 17)
Deportation of foreign workers for forced labour - its
justification under International Law by a state of national
emergency; Establishment of blocked industries; Delimitation
of Sauckel's and Speer's spheres of responsibility.
Employment of prisoners of war; of French civilians in
the Todt Organization; of concentration camp labour.
Defendant's counteractions against Hitler's destruction
orders.
NEURATH (see Part 5; Part 17; Part 18)
Argument on individual responsibility of State officials and
on concept of conspiracy.
Defendant's personality and his attitude to National
Socialism; The disarmament problem - defendant's struggle
for...
...Germany's equality of rights; France's policy of
encirclement and Germany's reactions.
Austria : Defendant's role; Bohemia and Moravia:
Defendant's appointment as Reich Protector; His repudiation
of Germanization plans; His limited powers, in particular
lack of control over police and its repressive measures; His
resignation.
Arguments by counsel on witnesses for indicted
organizations.
FRITZSCHE (see Part 5; Part 17)
Limited scope of defendant's position in Propaganda Ministry; Propaganda warfare and International Law; Press campaigns before aggressive actions; Defendant's...
...attitude to Nazi doctrines.
Argument on concept of principal and accessory.
Tribunal's announcement of procedural rules for the trial of
indicted organizations.
HESS (see Part 6; Part 9; Part 10)
Economic and political causes for Nazi rise to power.
Austria; Czechoslovakia; The Polish question and the
rapprochement between USSR and Germany.
Argument against defendant's participation in a common plan;
on concept of conspiracy; on group and individual
criminality.
Defendant's peace motives for his flight to England.
Concluding Speeches by Prosecution
Mr. Justice R. H. Jackson, for the United States of America:
Outline of the main crimes of the Nazi regime; The Common
Plan for preparation of aggression; The roles of the
individual defendants.
Argument against main defence pleas, particularly against
denial of knowledge and influence.
Sir Hartley Shawcross, for the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland
Nazis' domestic policy from 1933 to 1939, particularly
persecution of Church and Jews.
Crimes against Peace: Preparation and execution of
aggressions; Aggressive war; Argument against Prof.
Jahrreiss's defence speech (see Part 18).
War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity; particularly Stalag
Luft III case; Lynch law against "terror flyers",
Commando order; "Night and Fog" order; Partisan warfare;
Hostages; Ruthless conduct of naval war; Slave labour;
Genocide, extermination of the Jews; "Mercy" killings;
Concentration camps.
Criminal responsibility of the individual defendants.
[
Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.