Victory for Irving
The Journal of Historical Review
[Transcription note: for another perspective on Irving's failure to
make headway in Australia, see the 1995
Australian Federal Court judgment, and the 1996
Australian Federal Court judgment, both of which denied him entry
into the country. knm, 98/08/14]
Although forced to postpone his tour by one year,
Irving's message has
been getting through nevertheless. The historian has appeared, via
satellite, three times on Australian television during prime time, and has
given countless live and recorded radio interviews. Dozens of articles,
editorials, and letters to the editor have appeared in newspapers across the
country, and letters by
Irving clarifying his position have appeared in at
least two major newspapers. (The Australian, May 24; Sydney Morning
Herald, May 26.)
Generating the most attention, though, has been a specially-made
80-minute videotape cassette, "The Search for Truth in History," in which
Irving effectively presents his views on the Holocaust issue and on the
international fight for free speech. According to Veritas,
Irving's
Australian publisher, hundreds of the video were sold within hours of its
release in May. "They started buying it late yesterday [Wednesday]
afternoon and haven't stopped," reported Veritas manager Jan Pope. (Herald
Sun, May 21) Altogether some 10,000 copies have been produced. ("The
Search for Truth in History" is available from the IHR for $29, plus $2 for
shipping. See the inside front cover of this issue.)
All proceeds from sales of the video are earmarked for the
David Irving
Legal Fighting Fund, which was set up to overturn restrictions on the
historian's movements worldwide. (P.O. Box 1707, Key West, FL 33041, USA)
When
Irving's opponents learned of the video, they immediately
contacted the Film and Literature Censorship Board (FCB). Any video
imported for commercial purposes must have a FCB rating; without a rating it
would be illegal to sell or screen the video for profit. Technically, the
FCB can legitimately censor a video only if the contents are violent or
sexually depraved. Just hours before the first screening was scheduled to
start, the FCB issued the video a "G" rating, claiming it is "suitable for
viewing by persons of all ages and contains no material that would distress
or harm children." Five members of the ten-member Board voted to award the
"G" rating, four voted for a "PG" rating, and one voted to ban the video
entirely as being "not in the national interest."
The move was applauded by International PEN, a writers' group that
earlier supported
Irving's right to visit Canada. Likewise supportive was
the Sydney Morning Herald (May 21), which editorialized:
This robust trust by the [Film Censorship] board in the good sense
of the public is in the best interests of a workable and useful system
of censorship. The point about censorship is that there should be as
little of it as is necessary for the well-being of the community.
There has been too much censorship by Australian authorities of
Mr.
Irving's strange views, though. It's becoming increasingly obvious
that the Federal Government made a mistake when it decided, just before
the last election, to ban
Mr. Irving from Australia.
Interest in the outcome of the FCB vote was not limited to citizens of
Australia. Israel's secret intelligence agency Mossad apparently bugged the
room in which the FCB had met to discuss the
Irving video. In an article
headlined "Israeli secret agents linked with bugging," the Sunday Times of
Perth (May 30) reported that "allegations of a covert bugging operation
organized in Sydney by the Israeli intelligence organization Mossad are
being pursued" by the leader of Australia's opposition National Party. "An
espionage operation using a highly-sophisticated listening device is alleged
to have been discovered" in the building where the FCB met. "There is
speculation that the alleged operation is linked to the canceled visit and
lecture tour by controversial historian
David Irving, who claims Jewish
suffering in the Holocaust has been overstated," the paper went on.
Having failed to halt distribution of the new
Irving video, Jewish
groups next threatened and otherwise pressured the managers of hotels,
halls, and theaters where it was scheduled to be shown. As a result, a
number of screenings were canceled. In a letter to the Herald Sun (May
25), one reader expressed his disgust at this turn of events:
What a bunch of spineless yellow-bellies have so many Australians
become! The slightest threat of protest and virtually the entire
management of the proposed venues for the G-rated
David Irving "The
Search for Truth in History" video presentation, cave in.
At sites where the video was scheduled to show, groups of Jews gathered
to protest. David Berinson, 23-year-old spokesman for one such protest, was
quoted as saying, "It's clear that this sort of video, though I haven't seen
it, and
David Irving's statements have formed the basis of a lot of neo-Nazi
action in movements in Europe." (West Australian, Perth, May 20) Jewish
community leader Mark Leibler commented: "Australia is no place for the
peddling of
Irving's sick, racist hate propaganda." (Herald Sun, May 25)
Mick Coventry, owner of one establishment where the video was shown,
defended his decision to allow the screening: "I don't care what is on the
video, as long as it's not illegal." (Riverine Herald, May 26.)
Australian media coverage of the entire affair has been intense, as
noted in the May-June 1993 Journal. Front page headlines in the
Shepparton News of May 21 and 23, for example, proclaimed in two-inch-high
letters, "'Nazi'video on show," and "
Irving ban foiled."
A hostile review of the
Irving video in The Australian (Sydney, May
21) by Sam Lipski -- a "media commentator" and publisher of the Australian
Jewish News -- carefully avoided any substantive arguments and instead
relied on character assassination and misrepresentation to discount
Irving's
message.
In contrast to media coverage in other Western democracies of similar
disputes, most Australian papers have fairly and accurately presented the
views of
Irving and his supporters. For the most part, the country's press
reported that
Irving regards the Holocaust story as "exaggerated,"
"overstated," and "open to debate." Assertions that
Irving "denies the
Holocaust" come almost exclusively from Jewish sources, which have routinely
misrepresented other aspects of the issue.
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Previous |
JHR Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
in Australia Free Speech Struggle
Vol. 13, Number 6 (Nov./Dec. 1993
Electronic Democracy
"G" Rated
Israeli Snooping?
Pressure and Threat
Media Coverage