A Study of the Cyanide Compounds Content
As early as the first years after the end of World War II
single publications began to appear in which the authors
attempted to "whitewash" the Hitlerite regime and to call
various signs of its cruelties into question. But it was not
till the fifties that the trend may be defined as
"historical revisionism" arose and started developing; its
supporters claim that the history of the World War II has
been fabricated for the purposes of anti-German propaganda.
According to their statements there was no Holocaust, i. e.
no mass extermination of Jews and in that case the
Auschwitz-Birkenau Concentration Camp could not have been an
extermination camp - it was only a "common" forced labour
camp and no gas chambers existed in it.
Historical revisionism is now put forward by members of
various nations, who already have their own scientific
circles, own publications and also use the mass media for
their purposes. Up to 1988 the ,"revisionists"
<1> most
frequently manipulated historical sources or simply denied
the facts. Then, after the appearance of the so-called
Leuchter Report
(2), their tactics changed distinctly. The
above-mentioned Report, worked out on the basis of a study
of the ruins and remains of the crematoria and gas chambers
at Auschwitz-Birkenau, has been considered by them to be
specific evidence in support of their allegations and
evidence of judicial validity at that, since it was
commissioned by the court of law in Toronto (Canada). F.
Leuchter, living in Boston, worked on the design and
construction of gas chambers still in use to execute the
death penalty in some States of the USA. This is considered
to give him authority to take the role of expert as regards
gas chamber issues. In this connection Leuchter came to
Poland on 25 February 1988 and stayed here for 5 days,
visiting the camps at Auschwitz-Birkenau and at
Majdanek. In
his report based on this inspection he states that "he found
no evidence that any of the facilities that are usually
alleged to have been gas chambers were actually used as
such". Moreover, he claims that these facilities "could not
be used as gas chambers for killing people" (Item 4000 of
the Report).
Leuchter tried to confirm his conclusions with the help of
chemical analysis. For this purpose he took samples of
material fragments from the chamber ruins to subject them to
an analysis for hydrogen cyanide, the essential component of
Zyklon B, used - acc. to the testimony of witnesses - to gas
the victims. He took 30 samples altogether from all the five
structures used formerly as gas chambers. At laboratory
analyses performed in the USA the presence of cyanide ions
at concentrations of 1.1 to 7.9 mg/kg of material examined
was found in 14 samples. He also took one sample from the
delousing building at Birkenau, which he treated as a
"control sample", and in which cyanides were found to be
present at a concentration of 1060 mg kg of material. The
positive results of the analyses of samples from the former
gas chambers are explained by Leuchter by the fact that all
the camp facilities were subjected to a fumigation with
hydrogen cyanide in connection with a typhoid epidemic which
really broke out in the camp in 1942.
A later investigation, carried out by a G. Rudolf
(4),
confirmed the high concentrations of cyanogen compounds in
the facilities for clothes disinsectization. This may be so
since, being undamaged, these facilities were not exposed to
the action of weather conditions, especially rainfall.
Moreover, it is known that the duration of disinsectization
was relatively long, about 24 hours for each batch of
clothes (probably even longer), whereas the execution with
Zyklon B in the gas chambers took, according to the
statement of the Auschwitz Camp Commander Rudolf Hoess
(7)
and the data presented by Sehn
(6), only about 20 minutes.
It should also be emphasized that the ruins of these
chambers have been constantly exposed to the action of
precipitation and it can be estimated, on the basis of the
climatological records, that in these last 45 years or so
they have been rinsed rather thoroughly by a column of water
at least 35 m in height (!).
In our correspondence with the Management of the Auschwitz
Museum in 1989, not knowing the Leuchter Report then, we
expressed our anxiety as to the chances of detection of
cyanogen compounds in the chamber ruins; nevertheless, we
offered to carry out an appropriate study. At the beginning
of 1990 two workers of the Institute of Forensic Research
arrived on the premises of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp and
took samples for screening analysis: 10 samples of plaster
from the delousing chamber (Block No 3 at Auschwitz), 10
samples from gas chamber ruins and, in addition, 2 control
samples from the buildings which, as living quarters, had
not been in contact with hydrogen cyanide. Out of the 10
samples from the delousing chamber, seven contained cyanogen
compounds at concentrations from 9 to 147 µg in conversion
to potassium cyanide (which was used to construct the
calibration curve) and 100 g of material. As far as the
ruins are concerned, the presence of cyanide was
demonstrated only in the sample from the ruins of
Crematorium Chamber No II at Birkenau. Neither of the
control samples contained cyanides.
When the dispute on the Leuchter Report arose, we undertook
a closer study of the problem, availing ourselves, among
other publications, of J. C. Pressac's comprehensive work
(5). In consequence, we decided to start considerably more
extensive and conscientiously planned reaserches. To carry
them out, the Management of the Auschwitz Museum appointed
their competent workers, Dr F. Piper (custodian) and Mr W.
Smrek (engineer) to join the commission, in which they co-worked with the authors of the present paper, representing
the Institute of Forensic Research. Under this collaboration
the Museum workers were providing us on the spot with
exhaustive information concerning the facilities to be
examined and - as regards the ruins - a detailed topography
of the gas chambers we were concerned with. And so they made
it possible for us to take proper samples for analysis. We
tried to take samples - if at all possible - from the places
best sheltered and least exposed to rainfall, including also
as far as possible - fragments of the upper parts of the
chambers (hydrogen cyanide is lighter than air) and also of
the concrete floors, with which the gas from the spilled
Zyklon B came into contract at rather high concentrations.
The
original plaintext version
of this file is available via
ftp.
[
Index ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
in the Walls of the Gas Chambers
in the Former Auschwitz & Birkenau
Concentration Camps
Introduction