Hitler [Transcription note: Bracketed [Page] links provide access
to the individual images from which these transcriptions were
made]
The belief that Hitler is homosexual has probably developed (a) from the
fact that he does show so many feminine characteristics, and (b) from
the fact that there were so many homosexuals in the Party during the
early days and many continue to occupy important positions. It does
seem that Hitler feels much more at ease with homosexuals than with
normal persons, but this may be due to the fact that they are all
fundamentally social outcasts and consequently have a community of
interests which tends to make them think and feel more or less alike.
In this connection it is interesting to note that homosexuals, too,
frequently regard themselves as a special form of creation or as chosen
ones whose destiny it is to initiate a new order.
The fact that
underneath they feel themselves to be different and ostracized from
normal social contacts usually makes them easy converts to a new social
philosophy which does not discriminate against them. Being among
civilization's discontents, they are always willing to take a chance
of something new which holds any promise of improving their lot, even
though their chances of success may be small and the risk great. Having
little to lose to begin with, they can afford to take chances which
others would refrain from taking. The early Nazi party certainly
contained many members who could be regarded in this light. Even today
Hitler derives pleasure from looking at men's bodies and associating
with homosexuals. Strasser tells us that his personal body guard is
almost always 100% homosexuals.
[Page 196]
He also derives considerable pleasure from being with his Hitler Youth
and his attitude towards them frequently tends to be more that of a
woman than that of a man.
There is a possibility that Hitler has participated in a homosexual
relationship at some time in his life. The evidence is such that we
can only say there is a strong tendency in this direction which, in
addition to the manifestations already enumerated, often finds
expression in imagery concerning being attacked from behind or being
stabbed in the back. His nightmares, which frequently deal with being
attacked by a man and being suffocated, also suggest strong homosexual
tendencies and a fear of them. From these indications, however, we
would conclude that for the most part these tendencies have been
repressed, which would speak against the probability of their being
expressed in overt form. On the other hand, persons suffering from his
perversion sometimes do indulge in homosexual practices in the hope
that they might find sexual gratification. Even this perversion would
be more acceptable to them than the one with which they are afflicted.
Early school years.
The foundations of all the diverse patterns we have been considering
were laid during the first years of Hitler's life. Many of them, as we
have seen, were due primarily to the peculiar structure of the home,
while others developed from constitutional factors or false
interpretations of events.
[Page 197]
Whatever their origins may have been, they did set up anti-social
tendencies and tensions which disturbed the child to a high degree. From
his earliest days it would seem he must have felt that the world was a
pretty had place in which to live. To him it must have seemed as though
the world was filled with insurmountable hazards and obstacles which
prevented him from obtaining adequate gratifications, and dangers which
would menace his well-being if he attempted to obtain them in a direct
manner. The result was that an unusual amount of bitterness against
the world and the people in it became generated for which he could
find no suitable outlets. As a young child he must have been filled
with feelings of inadequacy, anxiety and guilt which made him anything
but a happy child.
It would seem, however, that he managed to repress most of his
troublesome tendencies and make a temporary adjustment to a difficult
environment before he was six years old, because at that time he entered
school and for the next years he was an unusually good student. All of
the report cards that have been found from the time he entered school
until he was eleven years old, show an almost unbroken line of "A's"
in all his school subjects. At the age of eleven the bottom dropped
right out of his academic career. From an "A" student he suddenly dropped
to a point where he failed in almost all his subjects and had to repeat
the year. This amazing about-face only becomes intelligible when we
realize that his baby brother [Page 198] died at that time. We can only surmise that this event served to reawaken his earlier conflicts and disrupt his psychological equilibrium.
In Hitler's case we may suppose that this event affected him in at
least two important ways. First, it must have reawakened fears of his
own death which, in turn, strengthened still further the conviction
that he was the "chosen one" and under divine protection. Second, it
would seem that he connected the death of his brother with his own
thinking and wishing on the subject. Unquestionably, he hated this
intruder and frequently thought of how nice it would be if he were
removed from the scene. Unconsciously, if not consciously, he must have
felt that the brother's death was the result of his own thinking on the
subject. This accentuated his feelings of guilt on the one hand, while
it strengthened still further his belief in special powers
of Divine origin on the other. To think about these things was almost
synonomous with having them come true. In order to avoid further guilt
feelings he had to put a curb on his thinking processes. The result of
this inhibition on thinking was that Hitler the good student was
transformed into Hitler the poor student. Not only did he
have to repeat the school year during which the brother died, but ever
after his academic performance was mediocre, to say the least. When we
examine his later report cards we find that he does well only in such
subjects as drawing and gymnastics, which require no thinking. In all
[Page 199] the other subjects such as mathematics,
languages or history, which require some thinking, his work is on the
borderline - sometimes satisfactory and sometimes unsatisfactory.
We can easily imagine that it was during this period that the father's
ire was aroused and he began to bring pressure on the boy to apply
himself in his school work and threatened dire consequences if he failed
to do so. From sociological evidence it would seem that this is about
the age at which most German fathers first take a real interest in their
sons and their education. If Hitler's father followed this general pattern,
we can assume that he had cause to be irate at his son's performance. The
constant struggle between himself and his father, which he describes in
MEIN KAMPF, is probably true although the motivations underlying his
actions were in all likelihood quite different from those he describes.
He was approaching the adolescent period and this, together with his
little brother's death, served to bring many dormant attitudes nearer
the surface of consciousness.
Many of these attitudes now found expression in the father-son
relationship. Briefly enumerated these would be (a) rejection of the
father as a model; (b) an inhibition against following a career which
demanded thinking; (c) the anal tendencies which found an outlet of
expression in smearing; (d) his passive, feminine tendencies, and
(e) his masochistic tendencies and his desire to be dominated by a
strong masculine figure. He was
[Page 200] not, however,
ready for an open revolt for he tells us in his autobiography that he
believed passive resistance and obstinacy were the best course and that
if he followed them long enough, his father would eventually relent
and allow him to leave school and follow an artist's career. As a matter
of fact, his brother Alois, in 193O, before the Hitler myth was well
established, reported, that his father never had any objection to
Adolph's becoming an artist but that he did demand that Adolph do well
in school. From this we might surmise that the friction between father
and son was not determined so much by his choice of a career as by
unconscious tendencies which were deriving satisfaction from
the antagonism.
Later school career.
He carried the same pattern into the schools where he was forever
antagonizing his teachers and the other boys. He has tried to create the
impression that he was a leader among his classmates, which is most
certainly false. More reliable evidence indicates that he was unpopular
among his classmates as well as among his teachers
who considered him lazy, uncooperative and a trouble-maker. The only
teacher during these years with whom he was able to get along was Ludwig
Poetsch, an ardent German Nationalist. It would he an error, however,
to suppose that Poetsch inculcated these nationalist feelings in Hitler.
It is much more logical to assume that all these feelings were present
in Hitler before he came in contact with
[Page 201] Poetsch
and that his nationalist teachings only offered Hitler a new outlet for the
expression of his repressed emotions. It was probably during this period
that he discovered a resemblance between the young state of Germany and
his mother, and between the old Austrian monarchy and his father. At this
discovery he promptly joined the Nationalist group of students who were
defying the authority of the Austrian state. In this way he was able to
proclaim openly his love for his mother and advocate the death of his
father. These were feelings he had had for a long time but was unable
to express. Now he was able to obtain partial gratification through
the use of symbols.
The death of his father.
This probably served to increase the friction between father and son,
for in spite of what Hitler says the best evidence seems to indicate
that the father was anti-German in his sentiments. This again placed
father and son on opposite sides of the fence and gave them new cause
for hostility. There is no telling how this would have worked out in
the long run because while the struggle between the two was at
its height, the father fell dead on the street. The repercussions of
this event must have been severe and reinforced all those feelings which
we have described in connection with the brother's death. Again, it must
have seemed like a fulfillment of a wish and again there must have
been severe feelings of guilt, with an additional inhibition on thinking
processes.
[Page 202]
His school work continued to decline and it seems that in order to
avoid another complete failure, he was taken from the school at Linz
and sent to school in Steyr. He managed to complete the year, however,
with marks which were barely satisfactory. It was while he was there
that the doctor told him that he had a disease from which
he would never recover. His reaction to this was severe since it
brought the possibility of his own death very much into the foreground
and aggravated all his childhood fears. The result was that he did not
return to school and finish his course, but stayed at home where he
lived a life which was marked by passivity. He neither studied nor
worked but spent most of his time in bed where he was again spoiled by
his mother who catered to his every need despite her poor
financial circumstances.
One could suppose that this was the materialization of his conception
of Paradise inasmuch as it reinstated an earlier childhood situation which
he had always longed for. It would seem from his own account, however,
that things did not go too smoothly, for he writes in MEIN KAMPF:
"When at the age of fourteen, the young man is dismissed from school,
it is difficult to say which is worse; his unbelievable ignorance as
far as knowledge and ability are concerned, or the biting impudence of
his behavior combined with an immorality which makes one's hair stand
on end...The three year old child has now become a youth
of fifteen who despises all authority... now he loiters about, and God
knows when he comes home."
[ Previous |
Index |
Next ]
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.
Psychological Analysis & Reconstruction
The
original plaintext version of this file is available via ftp.